Home :: Books :: Gay & Lesbian  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity
Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian

Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
Crime Against Nature: The Lamont Portry Selection for 1989

Crime Against Nature: The Lamont Portry Selection for 1989

List Price: $8.95
Your Price:
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: Pleasantly Surprised
Review: I read this book because I was curious. Sandra McPherson, Alfred Corn, and Marvin Bell (the three judges who chose this book as the Lamont Poetry selection) are all accomplished poets, and I wondered how they had come to choose a book published by a small, feminist press like Firebrand books. I wasn't sure what to expect, but I ended up pleasantly surprised.

Pratt doesn't use rhyme, meter, or classical forms, of course, but this book still conveys a careful craft. Her words are often well chosen, and the arrangements feel original enough. A few of the poems might be too simplistic, but others are anything but. Also, it might not mean much to literature, but for a general reader like myself, the book was a darn good read. A story builds from the first poem to the last, and the story moved me. It was well put and well taken. The strong story made it closer to a page-turner that I thought poetry could be.

A squeamish reader might be turned off by the subject matter, I suppose, but I was taken by Pratt's honesty. I didn't catch a whiff of either pretense or empty politics in this book. I wouldn't put Pratt on the same level as the modern masters (Derek Walcott, for instance, or Elizabeth Bishop) and I still question if this was the BEST of all the second books of poetry published in 1989--but the book was pleasureable in more than enough ways to make it worth reading. I give it 3 1/2 stars.


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates