<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: For any taste
Review: I thought this was a fantastic book that could be enjoyed by any lesbian or bi-gal. I'm neither and yet I couldn't put it down either! Please do a sequel!
Rating: 
Summary: All I Can Say Is WOW!!!
Review: I wonder how many copies of this book has found its way under the bed of "straight" women. Hmmmm... This is definitely wetness at its hottest. I particularly liked the extra attention paid to the more aggressive lesbian. I mean how can two passive lesbians have any fun? Somebody has to take the initiative.
One more thing: nipple clamps rule!
Rating:
Summary: Very hot stuff
Review: I'm not even a lesbian (actually, I'm a guy) and I dug this book a lot. This is some good stuff -- no filler, just lots of steamy, graphically detailed (but genuinely erotic) sex -- none of that "her tenderness opened the flower of her lovingness" stuff readers of erotic literature know all too well here. A bit too much butch/femme roleplaying for my tastes (I fully support a woman's right to be named "Hank," but I don't necessarily need to see her having sex), but then, of course, this book wasn't intended for me. Good stories, recommended.
Rating:
Summary: Hot, Hot, Hot!
Review: Nicole Foster never fails to excite me with her books--and WET is no exception. It's filled with hot, juicy stories of lesbian desire and sensuality. Makes a great companion book to her excellent SKIN DEEP. In fact, it might be even better! I definitely learned a thing or two reading it, and I've been a lesbian a loooong time! Buy it! You won't be disappointed.
Rating: 
Summary: damp maybe, but not wet
Review: not the best collection of erotica i've read by a long shot. most of the stories are poorly written, even if they do deliver the sex promised. they're very amateur-level stories, with no consideration for narrative flow, or dialogue or any of the other things needed to make an erotica piece a WELL-WRITTEN erotica piece.if sex is what you're looking for, this is okay. otherwise, move on to another collection.
Rating:
Summary: Wet? More like "Wetlands"....
Review: Okay. So one or two of these vignettes were about "playin' down at the Y" (if ya know what I mean, heh heh). The overwhelming bulk of this rather thick opus, however, addressed the travails of young Sleetan, a Bantu lad obsessed with tracking down his poor lost savannah-dwelling Okapi. Lest I forget, I should point out that Foster's prose conforms nicely to the Bolkmoninov theory of lesbionic dualism. One story that illustrates this in exemplary fashion is "Ruthie the Riveter", who rivets more than just steel (if ya know what I mean, heh heh!). So back to Sleetan and the "more wetlands than wet" nature of this much-lauded trilogy. Young Sleetan, with a near randy desire to skin his Okapi in order to please his tribal chieftains with a dapper belt, is drawn from his abode on the Serengeti Plain clear across southern Africa to the Okavango Delta estuary. Hence the "wetlands". Oh, and did I mention that Ruthie the Riveter enjoyed the "wetlands" in her friend's "delta", if ya know what I mean? (Heh heh).
Rating:
Summary: Licks any other piece of Lesbo Lit out there!
Review: Since her extradition from New Guinea Nicole Foster has been on fire!!! "Wet" is a masterpiece of American literature, the great novel. Nothing Foster has previously written trots within furlongs of "Wet". And other lesbianistic writers? Pshaw! Faludi can't touch it, and no Amazon from Lesbos's girthy shoulders would let Susie Bright wade near it. Foster invokes Millet, Brownmiller, and Diamanda Galas to support astonishing revelations, i.e "K.D. Lang rhymes with Big Bang", "...did you know that the denizens of Lesbos made beefalo jerky, too, just like our own Arapahoe Indians?", and "The Joan of Arc was a skilled tank commander who also invented the water balloon." Just think ---- If the Joan had summoned all of her considerable martial skills to defeat the Brits, we'd be eating frog legs with our Big Macs! Kudos to you, authoress Foster. You done good!
Rating:
Summary: Wow
Review: The stories in this book are overwhelmingly hot. Good, solid storytelling, excellent dialogue. Juicy plots. Makes me yearn for a sequel. WETTER, anyone?
Rating:
Summary: Sexy Stories - I honestly enjoyed them
Review: When a friend gave me this book, I expected the stories to be poorly written and -- frankly -- somewhat trashy. Imagine my pleasant surprise when many of them actually turned out to be GOOD. Most of them were very short and they got to the point pretty quickly. This is some of the better quality women's erotica that I have read lately. Keep up the good work Nicole and company! I can't wait for the next one.
<< 1 >>
|
