Corpus Juris Humorous: In Brief : A Compilation of Outrageous, Unusual, Infamous and Witty Judicial Opinions from 1256 A.D. to the Present

Rating:
Summary: Loved it!
Review: I am reviewing this book because I believe the other two negative reviews are not quite fair. Admittedly, the book is not for everyone, but this does not make it a lousy book. While the book will particularly appeal to members of the legal profession, I think that any stylist or semanticist will also find it a real treat. The humorous aspect of the book is essentially in the judges' serious responses to ludicrous legal claims using excessively precise language and bombastic rhetoric. If you are looking for silly jokes and funny one-liners, this book is not for you.

Rating:
Summary: Funny in spots, but is this the funniest that judges are?
Review: On the one hand, it's fun to see judges pontificate, expound at length and occasionally go completely over the edge (with the exception of those few who were there already.) On the other, it gets a little dull after a while with some of the cases. My suggestion #1: buy the book if you're a lawyer or aspiring lawyer. (I bought it as part of my preparation for law school.) My suggestion #2: be prepared to skim over some of the more lengthy cases -- unless the notion of, for example, page upon page extolling the virtues of the dog as a companion appeals to you. My suggestion #3: consider buying it locally. I found the book cheaper at a local retailer. (Do you suppose this still gets posted if I include that last suggestion?)

Rating:
Summary: Loved it!
Review: There are a lot more amusing opinions out there than this book describes. The many opinions in the book from before WWII are humorous if you understand the context, but this is a very spotty treatment of the subject. And, no, I'm not planning my own book.

Rating:
Summary: Spotty treatment
Review: There are a lot more amusing opinions out there than this book describes. The many opinions in the book from before WWII are humorous if you understand the context, but this is a very spotty treatment of the subject. And, no, I'm not planning my own book.

<< 1 >>