<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Jeff Chandler's Curse
Review: "Jeff Chandler" by Marilyn Kirk is not a good book. Poorly written, badly edited and grossly redundant writing are among the first problems. Ms. Kirk has no understanding about film writing and cannot analyze or offer insight into Chandler's films. Chandler's portrayal of Cochise in "Broken Arrow" did not break ground as Ms. Kirk claims, it was the intelligent script and the brilliant direction. Chandler's supporting actor nomination was well deserved but stop to consider he never came near that kind of work again. Also, Kirk relies heavily on quoting old Movie magazines that were routinely written by PR people at the studios. Also, Esther Williams left a huge elephant in Jeff Chandler's life and the author doesn't acknowledge it or even try to dispute it or attempt create reasonable doubt of the cross dressing allegations. Ms. Kirk has not done Jeff Chandler memory any justice if anything Kirk has clouded it up with sappy writting. Worse yet, the book doesn't examine the era that Chandler worked, the end of the Hollywood Golden Era - he saw & witnessed,and even took part as the emergence of television broke down the studio system. There is no examination of Hollywood as it was in the Fifties - still a glamorous town with fabulous night clubs and restaurants - it is for certain that Chandler took part in that scene. In the final analysis, Ms. Kirk was too involved with her subject. The best biographies are written objectively, with great acceptance/awareness of the flaws/warts of the subject. Marilyn Kirk has written Jeff Chandler colorless, cold and uninteresting. As a Chandler fan I was disappointed, it would have been wonderful to have had a book about a hard working actor in the last vestiges of Hollywood glamour and style.
Rating:
Summary: Jeff Chandler's Curse
Review: "Jeff Chandler" by Marilyn Kirk is not a good book. Poorly written, badly edited and grossly redundant writing are among the first problems. Ms. Kirk has no understanding about film writing and cannot analyze or offer insight into Chandler's films. Chandler's portrayal of Cochise in "Broken Arrow" did not break ground as Ms. Kirk claims, it was the intelligent script and the brilliant direction. Chandler's supporting actor nomination was well deserved but stop to consider he never came near that kind of work again. Also, Kirk relies heavily on quoting old Movie magazines that were routinely written by PR people at the studios. Also, Esther Williams left a huge elephant in Jeff Chandler's life and the author doesn't acknowledge it or even try to dispute it or attempt create reasonable doubt of the cross dressing allegations. Ms. Kirk has not done Jeff Chandler memory any justice if anything Kirk has clouded it up with sappy writting. Worse yet, the book doesn't examine the era that Chandler worked, the end of the Hollywood Golden Era - he saw & witnessed,and even took part as the emergence of television broke down the studio system. There is no examination of Hollywood as it was in the Fifties - still a glamorous town with fabulous night clubs and restaurants - it is for certain that Chandler took part in that scene. In the final analysis, Ms. Kirk was too involved with her subject. The best biographies are written objectively, with great acceptance/awareness of the flaws/warts of the subject. Marilyn Kirk has written Jeff Chandler colorless, cold and uninteresting. As a Chandler fan I was disappointed, it would have been wonderful to have had a book about a hard working actor in the last vestiges of Hollywood glamour and style.
Rating: 
Summary: Jeff Chandler's book is incredible, Marilyn Kirk is awesome!
Review: Dear fans, and Marilyn Kirk. Your book takes fans by storm! The long awaited bio of Jeff Chandler is a must read, must share and talk about! I love it, and continue to read and re-read and enjoy! You have captured the essence of Jeff in a way only a true fan could do. It is with great thanks I write to tell fans to read this book, and to thank Marilyn for writing it. Please tell everyone to buy a copy! Fans, please join the Jeff Chandler fan club and discuss this book with other fans! ... Thanks so much! Gina
Rating:
Summary: Very Touching Biography
Review: I truly enjoyed the biography of Jeff Chandler. Not one thing or person had any thing but high regard for his professional career as a actor. And sooo handsome, I can't imagine even finding a actor to look like him to play his life story. My mother loved him so, that he named my brother's middle name after him.
So tragic that he died at the young age of 43. What greater accomplishments he would have made if he was here with us longer than 1961. I have watched several of his movies but am saddened that they don't play them as often as the networks should. He truly was a "under-rated" actor. There will never be another Jeff Chandler, nor will we see his likes again...
Rating: 
Summary: Finally a Jeff Chandler bio -- The Ecstasy and the Agony
Review: Rarely has a book inspired such intensely mixed feelings in me. For years I wanted to know more about the life and career of Jeff Chandler, who was intriguing in so many ways--a handsome, prematurely grey, Jewish leading man who played almost everything but Jews, a good-looking man in an offbeat way, scarred from a motor accident, a man revered for his friendship and loyalty, who offered his own eye when his friend Sammy Davis was in danger of losing both his own, and a tough guy who died far too young from medical misadventure. So despite grave misgivings when I saw that this new book was a vanity publication (i.e., published by financial arrangement by the author rather than being chosen for publication based on its merits), I leapt at the chance to read it. And indeed it answered, and elaborated on the answers to, many questions and curiosities I'd had about Chandler. There is much herein that is interesting to read about his early life, his accidents, his friendships, and in particular his demise. But there is a HUGE caveat: Marilyn Kirk is a fan and, despite her bio blurb, apparently not a professional writer. Now neither of these factors prevent anyone from producing a fine book. But this is not a fine book. As books go, it is not even a good one. The author's style is nonexistent, beyond a fulsome adoration of her subject. Chronology is so utterly dispensed with that it becomes nigh impossible to keep facts straight, as the author jumps willy-nilly through Chandler's life, almost giving the surreal impression that the events of that life occurred all at the same time. A chapter about Chandler's boyhood will have long passages about his funeral, or some other event from much later, not because the jump in time improves our understanding of the boyhood event, but apparently because the author simply flew off on a tangent. Similarly, the author bounces from calling Chandler "Jeff" to using his birth name "Ira" and back again, to the point of disorienting even the well-informed reader. The book suffers also from the worshipful, non-critical fan's point of view. The barest lip service is paid to the idea that Chandler might not have been a saint, and controversial aspects of his nature and rumors that might to some seem shameful are studiously avoided. Worst offense of all, though, for anyone expecting to read the truth about a subject is not the absence of critical analysis of the man and his work, nor the jumbled syntax and timelines, but the overwhelming reliance on fan magazines as a primary source of information. Fan magazine stories, as every serious student of film history knows, were concocted extensively by studio publicity people or by their lackeys at the magazine and can never be relied upon as source of factual information. Yet author Kirk cites 55 publications in her bibliography, 75% of which are fan magazines. And her notes indicate that the other, comparatively reliable, publications used as sources (the L.A. Times, Chicago Tribune, etc.) were cited almost exclusively as regards Chandler's illness, death, and the subsequent investigation. The conclusion is unavoidable that virtually everything preceding that portion of her book is based most extensively on the completely unreliable material in fan magazines. Indeed, Kirk herself lists nearly seven pages of fan magazine articles, calling them "a very useful source of information on the life of Jeff Chandler."
In the end, it is not my intent to denigrate the effort Kirk has put into this book, nor the devotion she obviously holds for her subject. I've written biographies and I know how difficult the task is to complete one at all, let alone well. And truth be told, even knowing what I know about this book, if I had it to do over again, I would buy and read the book, such is my interest in the subject. But though this is the only biography of Jeff Chandler in print (and very likely the only one that will ever be), it is not the definitive biography, nor is it a reliable or well-written one. It serves to whet the appetite for a real book by someone who knows how to research and organize, who has stylistic skills and a critically subjective point of view, and who isn't afraid someone might not like the guy she's writing about. And if ever there were a warning about the mixed-blessings of print-on-demand vanity pressings, this is it. A good-sized book on an interesting but probably not very commercial subject got published. But it misleads those uninformed enough to believe anything published must be good, and it disappoints those who hoped for something of note. And even if you know your film history, the knot of truth and flack-generated fancy presented here is impossible to untangle. It's a pity.
Rating:
Summary: Finally a Jeff Chandler bio -- The Ecstasy and the Agony
Review: Rarely has a book inspired such intensely mixed feelings in me. For years I wanted to know more about the life and career of Jeff Chandler, who was intriguing in so many ways--a handsome, prematurely grey, Jewish leading man who played almost everything but Jews, a good-looking man in an offbeat way, scarred from a motor accident, a man revered for his friendship and loyalty, who offered his own eye when his friend Sammy Davis was in danger of losing both his own, and a tough guy who died far too young from medical misadventure. So despite grave misgivings when I saw that this new book was a vanity publication (i.e., published by financial arrangement by the author rather than being chosen for publication based on its merits), I leapt at the chance to read it. And indeed it answered, and elaborated on the answers to, many questions and curiosities I'd had about Chandler. There is much herein that is interesting to read about his early life, his accidents, his friendships, and in particular his demise. But there is a HUGE caveat: Marilyn Kirk is a fan and, despite her bio blurb, apparently not a professional writer. Now neither of these factors prevent anyone from producing a fine book. But this is not a fine book. As books go, it is not even a good one. The author's style is nonexistent, beyond a fulsome adoration of her subject. Chronology is so utterly dispensed with that it becomes nigh impossible to keep facts straight, as the author jumps willy-nilly through Chandler's life, almost giving the surreal impression that the events of that life occurred all at the same time. A chapter about Chandler's boyhood will have long passages about his funeral, or some other event from much later, not because the jump in time improves our understanding of the boyhood event, but apparently because the author simply flew off on a tangent. Similarly, the author bounces from calling Chandler "Jeff" to using his birth name "Ira" and back again, to the point of disorienting even the well-informed reader. The book suffers also from the worshipful, non-critical fan's point of view. The barest lip service is paid to the idea that Chandler might not have been a saint, and controversial aspects of his nature and rumors that might to some seem shameful are studiously avoided. Worst offense of all, though, for anyone expecting to read the truth about a subject is not the absence of critical analysis of the man and his work, nor the jumbled syntax and timelines, but the overwhelming reliance on fan magazines as a primary source of information. Fan magazine stories, as every serious student of film history knows, were concocted extensively by studio publicity people or by their lackeys at the magazine and can never be relied upon as source of factual information. Yet author Kirk cites 55 publications in her bibliography, 75% of which are fan magazines. And her notes indicate that the other, comparatively reliable, publications used as sources (the L.A. Times, Chicago Tribune, etc.) were cited almost exclusively as regards Chandler's illness, death, and the subsequent investigation. The conclusion is unavoidable that virtually everything preceding that portion of her book is based most extensively on the completely unreliable material in fan magazines. Indeed, Kirk herself lists nearly seven pages of fan magazine articles, calling them "a very useful source of information on the life of Jeff Chandler."
In the end, it is not my intent to denigrate the effort Kirk has put into this book, nor the devotion she obviously holds for her subject. I've written biographies and I know how difficult the task is to complete one at all, let alone well. And truth be told, even knowing what I know about this book, if I had it to do over again, I would buy and read the book, such is my interest in the subject. But though this is the only biography of Jeff Chandler in print (and very likely the only one that will ever be), it is not the definitive biography, nor is it a reliable or well-written one. It serves to whet the appetite for a real book by someone who knows how to research and organize, who has stylistic skills and a critically subjective point of view, and who isn't afraid someone might not like the guy she's writing about. And if ever there were a warning about the mixed-blessings of print-on-demand vanity pressings, this is it. A good-sized book on an interesting but probably not very commercial subject got published. But it misleads those uninformed enough to believe anything published must be good, and it disappoints those who hoped for something of note. And even if you know your film history, the knot of truth and flack-generated fancy presented here is impossible to untangle. It's a pity.
Rating:
Summary: Jeff Chandler - the star and the man.
Review: This book is written by a big fan of his.That is fine. I had wished for a more seasoned writer to tackle this complex man.But this book will register with any true Chandler fan. I remember as a young kid viewing Chocise and then his movie Away All Boats.I have seen all of his movies and they mostly hold up today as few stars do.He was at universal during the early fifties - gaining fame with Hudson, and Curtis.He was one of the few actors that helped his actresses look so good. Ladies such as : Crawford and Novack and Turner.
This man was a good man - with a sad ending. His last film was Merrills Mauraders and he was very good as the war wearing and sick general.I wish the author concentrated more on this. It would have been a better book if she interviewed some of his friends and children more extensively- which she did not.
By the way the utter baloney of what Esther Williams wrote is liable, wrong and sick. She was NOT a close friend of his, is suffering from alzheimers and his close friend Sheila Mccrae confirms this.
I know where I speak.Jeff Chandler was my Uncle!!!!!
<< 1 >>
|
