The making of Star trek

Rating:
Summary: A classic book for those interseted in television production
Review:

A classic book for those interested in television production, especially "Star Trek". This is the first book that gave the details of the production of a particular television series, and has served as a model for similar books to follow. The original "Star Trek" was still in production at the time this book was written, and the book has gone into many reprints. A good primer for those who follow the current crop of "Star Trek" shows and movies, and are interested in finding out about the classic original. This book is definitely a must-have for fans of the original series. Co-written by the creator himself.

Rating:
Summary: A Trekker's joy
Review: I read this in the Seventies and thoroughly enjoyed it. Now I've bought it again and enjoyed it all over again. Fascinating behind-the-scenes look at TOS. You have to read this book to understand what a groundbreaking series Star Trek was. You also learn how grueling a TV series is to work on. This book is fascinating, and sometimes hilarious!

Rating:
Summary: For any Star Trek fan this book is a must read.
Review: I was 5 yrs old when this book was written. This book was originally published in 1968, for I have one of the original paper back copies. I have become over the years a BIG Star Trek fan and love anything related to Star Trek. This book gives you an up close look at the making of the original Star Trek pilot throught the two seasons of the series. It gives you a lot of trivia which I really enjoyed. How lucky we are that the show got off the ground at all. Stephen Whitfield did a great job making you feel like you were there during the ups and downs. It's great to see just how far Star Trek has come from that beginning. It was a great book.

Rating:
Summary: Spouk
Review: There are probably loads of 'Making of Star Trek' books out there, but this is particularly interesting as it was written in 1968, between the second and third series, before the show had become a phenomenon. Which is odd at first - everything is in the present tense, and there's nothing about the cultural impact of the show because that was all in the future. Doubly odd is the fact that all of the many quotes from Gene Roddenberry are reported IN BLOCK CAPITALS, giving the bizarre impression that he is not a television producer, but God Himself.

It's extremely detailed, and is as much about the making of any TV late-60s series as it is 'Star Trek'. There are bits from shooting scripts, set plans, photographs of noted theatre actor William Shatner in old-age makeup (looking nothing like he looks in genuine old age), profiles of production staff, and programme budgets which, translated dollar-for-dollar, would just about cover the catering bill on 'Star Trek : The Next Generation'. It's worth it for the stream of memos about Vulcan names alone.

Rating:
Summary: A real look behind the scenes
Review: This is a classic. It is the first book of its kind, and probably the first book about Star Trek at all. But The Making of Star Trek is much more than any of the later books with similar names. This book doesn't idealize or simplify the making of the series. It doesn't enthusiastically praise everything and everyone involved in its production. It is an authentic and meticulous report on how TOS in particular and a TV series in general comes to life. It shows that it is a process of try and error, that aspects have to be taken into account the viewers wouldn't think of, and that the responsible persons don't always know exactly what they want ("I need some device that does something...").

The story how Stephen E. Whitfield (aka Stephen E. Poe) asked Gene Roddenberry if he could write a book about the series sounds like a fairy tale, but is true. The Great Bird was very forthcoming, and Whitfield was granted access to everything behind the scenes of the still running show, seemingly without any restriction. The book shows production schedules, budgets, private notes, script drafts, production sketches, all things that are usually kept secret or simplified for a larger public. I don't think that something like this would be still possible today. Compared to The Making of Star Trek, Whitfield's last book (he passed away in 2000) on Voyager seems rather superficial.

The Making of Star Trek may be over 30 years old, but it is of more than only historical value. It demonstrates that TV is a business that sometimes doesn't allow technical or artistic perfection. It also shows how many things we may take for granted and that are essential parts of the Star Trek Universe today have taken a rather surprising course change. Who would like Vulcans with names like "Spook, Spork, Splak, ..." as frequently suggested in the early days, or who would think that one race was originally described with the words, "Honor is a despicable trait.", namely the Klingons?

Rating:
Summary: Blood, Sweat, And Tears In Space
Review: Throughout Star Trek's three decades plus history, there have been plenty of making of books, to choose from. What sets The Making of Star Trek apart from all of those others (especially the books written about the original series), is the fact that it was first published, while the show was still in production.

Since 1968, the book has been a mainstay, and even after dozens of printings, it still holds up. Stephen E. Whitfield's book is for anyone who wants to get into the television industry and/or considers themself a classic series fan. There is a treasure trove of infomation--from inception, every memo between creator Roddenberry and the studio is there and then some. The book is divided into 5 sections taking us through the first two years. There are dozens of black and white photos and sketches throughout the 414 pages. It's great to have a seemingly fresh perspective on things. Highly recommended