Rating: 
Summary: Buy this book if possible
Review: A very good resource to one of the better Stephen King adaptations. Darabont takes the reader through his shooting script and storyboards explaining why changes had to be made even during production and editing. I would also like to add that even though a copy of the screenplay is available on many screenwriting websites, it is best to buy the book. Not only do you get the extras but all profits are donated towards AIDS research.
Rating: 
Summary: Review for Shawshank Redemption: The Shooting Script
Review: An extraordinary tale of hope friendship, and survival inside a maximum security prison. An essential work for all fans, students, and writers intrigued by the film-making process."Frank Darabont, with this one work, declares himself a special talent." --The Chicago Tribune
Rating: 
Summary: Great in depth exploration
Review: As a rule, don't buy shooting scripts if you want to write a screenplay. Shooting scripts are finished products.
That said, screenwriters can learn from this exploration of the classic movie (yes, folks, it is a classic, it's been shown a billion times on TNT), by reading the deleted scenes (my personal favorite is one about the publicity of Warden Norton's prison-to-work scheme, in which Heywood, played in the movie by William Sadler, gets his best and sharpest lines for someone who's supposed to be the dunce of the movie), the storyboards, the explanations of which scenes were kept, etc.
And for people who just love the movie, it's a must-own.
Rating:
Summary: A great buy for any film student or "Shawshank..." lover
Review: As Frank Darabont says in the introduction of the book, who else would buy the screenplay unless they really want to know more about the film? Sticking to that idea, Darabont has given the film student/buff, and those who simply love the movie, a real treat with this book. Not only does it contain the screenplay, it's the screenplay (I emphasize) AS IT WAS WRITTEN BEFORE FILMING. He's published it exactly as he wrote it when he adapted it from King's novella. I point this out because, as Darabont himself points out in the intro, so many screenplays that are thrown out by merchandise wizards are nothing but the finished movie transcribed. And really, what good is that to someone who wants a deeper knowledge of the film?
Not only does he give us the original screenplay, he gives us a scene-by-scene comparison of the screenplay vs. the finished film, and why things got changed/added/left out. This, in particular, says a lot about Darabont to me. This is a man who wants to use his work not only to be what it is (a GREAT film), but to educate as well. This book inspires. He includes storyboards, as well (including a storyboard for a deleted scene- oh, goody, goody!) and introductions by both himself and Stephen King, and a summarizing bit of advice to budding filmmakers and screenwriters. I devoured this book in short time (one night), lol, and found myself going back to the film to compare and analyze- if you don't do the same after reading it, I'll eat my foot.. okay, maybe not. But something drastic, I warrant you. If you are at all inclined to learn about filmmaking, writing, or even if you just love "The Shawshank Redemption" (which is what lead me to the book in the first place), this is a real must-have. It's worth the price alone just to read what he had to say about filming Freeman's scene walking through the field after discovering Andy's message. Trust me. By the way, fellow "Shawshank..." lovers are welcome to ...discuss it. Enjoy this book, everyone. It's a real find. And I'm SO glad I chose to buy it. The ONLY reason I give it four stars as opposed to five is because, personally, I would have liked to have seen more storyboards.
Rating:
Summary: I hope... I'm free.
Review: I really liked the book and the movie itself. Stephen King, for sure, didn't intend when he wrote Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption to emphasize a lot on the character of Andy. I think the basic character is the Morgan Freeman one. Frank Darabont, emphasized on both characters, Andy and Red. I have to ask myself, it's the redemption of who and of what? Is it the redemption of Andy, of Red, of Warren...? I think it's the redemption of all the characters in the book. At the end each one of them took what he deserved. Warren Suicide, Andy Freedom, and Red Hope. The brilliant thing about Shawshank Redemption script and movie is that the reader can't know what will happen and can estimate nothing untill the end of the story, there's no meaning of hope yet. What's hope in that movie? Is it something that we usually loose when we grow older under certain TERRIBLE conditions? Red lost all hope of getting outside Shawshank, at a certain time he wasn't willing to go out, he can never face the outside. Shawshank made him a machine man with machine heart and machine mind. Andy remind him back of his humanity, and hope is what deferenciates humans from other living species. I realized at the end that Hope is Freedom and it's not the opposite. When you have hope you can be free and when you don't you can never be free. The difference between Red and Andy is that Andy always believed in hope and that thing made him free, Red got out of Shawshank after 40 years and he was not free. Red started to feel freedom ("I think it's the excitement only a freemam can feel, a freeman at the start of a long journey whose conclusion is uncertain") when he regain hope and broke all rules and went to see his friend Andy. Hope is like dreams, when you lose it you lose your existence and therefore your humanity.
Rating:
Summary: True to the story.
Review: I've read Stephen King's novella "Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption" which is one of my favorite novellas. With "The Shawshank Redemption" Frank Darabont held true to the story's spirit, often borrowing phrases straight from the book. However, writing the story for a visual presentation caused Darabont to take some dramatic liberties, which proved to be wise choices.
Rating:
Summary: The closest thing to crawling into the mind of a filmmaker.
Review: If you ever wonder what goes through a writer/director's mind during the creative process of bringing a story from novel to screen this is the book to get. The only other experience that comes close to this well put together book is watching one of those Special Edition DVDs or Laser Discs that contain running audio commentary and behind the scenes documentary on them. The book includes; a forward by Steven King, introduction by Frank Darabount, the full shooting script, which by the way is type set in film industry standard, a detailed listing and explanation of scenes that were cut from the film and storyboards. The only other book that comes close to this is Steven Soderbergh's book of Sex, Lies and Videotape. Now if only other so called published screenplays of films could live up to these two books the world just might be a better place.
Rating:
Summary: A Most Brilliant, Exquiste, and Thoughtful Movie
Review: The Shawshank Redemption is the closest thing to a masterpiece to come from Hollywood (that wasn't directed by Steven Speilberg) in a very long time. It is one of the most fantastic and wondefully made movies I have ever seen. And it was created by America's greatest living writer, and a young, brilliant director whose talents were previously wasted in such God-awful messes, as "Candyman 2". I am speaking of none other than the onem and only Stephen King and Frank Darabont. I've noticed Darabont has been directing ONLY King adaptions he has done himself, as the upcoming Green Mile, which will be spectacular. "Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption" was Stephen King's best piece of fiction, and it turned out to be the most terrific film, which doesn't happen very often with King adaptions. "Misery" was a wonderful movie, but it lost something in the transfer, a bit of the evil, but it also gained something from the superb Kathy Bates. "Dolores Claiborne" was a terrific movie, full of heart and cast to perfection, but it too lost something (and again kudos to Kathy Bates for her peformance as Ms. Claiborne). But Shawshank ranks supreme. What makes especially crazy is that itm won no oscars! Nominated for seven, but no oscars! Well, the Green Mile should make up for what is lost.
Rating:
Summary: Wow! Adds depth to an already excellent cinematic experience
Review: The shooting script contains forewards (by Stephen King by Frank Darabont), the screenplay, changes from the screenplay to the movie, some final thoughts by Darabont, and the credits. It's fascinating reading the screenplay after seeing the movie, then reading the changes made in to the screenplay and why. For example, in scene 36, Andy approaches Red to buy a rock hammer and they agree on ten dollars. In the movie, it just happens and we overlook the question on how Andy would have gotten the money in the first place. In the screen play, we find out in scenes 40 and 41 where he got the money (brought in with him ... internally). However, later, the book explains how the scene read well, but didn't work well on the screen. In retrospect, we don't really *care* that he had money anyway, so the scene is easily dropped without sacrificing clarity. The book adds some interesting "inside" information. For example, when we first see Red meeting with the parole board, the file has a picture of him when he was younger. This photo is actually a cameo by Morgan Freeman's son, Alfonso, who also provided some of the background voices during the "Fresh Fish" taunting in the early part of the movie. Overall, the book adds depth to an already excellent cinematic experience.
Rating:
Summary: Great book
Review: This book was better then the movie. the movie was good but the book when into more depth. I really like the movie and i really liek the book.
|
