Rating: Summary: Unbelievably Unfocused and Underlisted Review: Actually, 1.5 stars: this has to be, without doubt, the most unfocused and incomplete AMG ever produced. I agree with the reviewer who asserted that AMG simply cut and pasted content off their web site and quickly threw together this diffuse hodge-podge of questionable and incomplete listings. Caveat Emptor: this book is not the 2nd edition like Amazon lists it as. 2nd editions generally take what was wrong with firsts, correct, and expand. This is what the AMG brain-trust needs to do with this book: the foundation is there, just seriously review content, edit out what isn't true electronica (by their admitted definitions), and expand to include other artists, including the complete discography (you don't have to review each album, just list) of established artists and the genre's prolific indies like Thumbtack Smoothie and Voice of Eye. So what if it approaches 1,200 pages? Same with Pop: unless they're cutting-edge contributers like Blancmange or Gary Numan, leave all the 80's synth-pop and hair-band fluff out; C'mon AMG,Flock of Seagulls and Talk Talk? Plus, devoting nearly three pages to verbose, hyper-detailed reviews of every Prince album, yet hardly any attention to the shifting careers and prolific output of ground-breakers like Tangerine Dream and Klaus Schulze? Some listings are just plain insulting: the superficial Sun Ra discography is a huge disservice; although Sun Ra did introduce electronics into the jazz idiom, the music was still jazz--artists like this should be given full attention in the AMG Jazz Guide. Likewise, rock-oriented artists should remain in the AMG Rock Guide; I like Radiohead and Pink Floyd, but they seem woefully out of place here (in the case of PF, they stop the discography listings at "The Wall." Who was in charge of this project?) And if AMG wishes to questionably include the "Shoegazer" movement as electronica, why list My Bloody Valentine and leave out Lush or Catherine Wheel? Be consistent!! Not that the book is all bad. The essays and chart maps on how all the various electronica sub-genres evolved are informative reading, and push the book up 1/2 star. Plus they give good attention to all the various DJ's and their respective roles in the genre's development. And thankfully Yanni and John Tesh aren't included (there is a benign God, after all.) The foundation is here; nonetheless, AMG needs to start over with this guide, review, cut, and expand. Better yet, maybe an enterprising MUSICHOUND editior will read these reviews and decide to produce and release their own competing guide. At least they won't short-shrift the artist's discography for the sake of space. Who knows, they might even include a photo or two....
Rating: Summary: Could you be any cooler?? Review: AMG's voluminous electronic music directory is cogent and exhaustive, sure to be a delight for the style's fans and non-fans alike. Fans will love this book for its thoroughness, its uber-cool, authoritative air and for its immense lack of humor, all of which seem reflective of the scene(s) it seeks to document. Non-fans will be delighted by the intensive devotion to ephemera and the belligerently academic tone which seeks to browbeat outsiders into accepting the worldview of a musical movement that hails each club opening as the birth of a new subgenre. Hundreds of artists and dozens of styles are outlined and their histories detailed with absolute, messianic precision. While AMG's level of writing is superior to most of its contemporaries, the tone is no less smug or evangelical; the sense of being intellectually bludgeoned will seem familiar to those of us who have watched the rise of electronica with wry but aggrieved detatchment. (Yes, I'm sure you love the stuff, but do you have to devote so much energy to coercing the rest of us into adopting your point of view?) All kidding aside, this book will be a definitive resource for years to come. Anyone interested in understanding the growth and self-perceptions of the electronic music cult will find this book invaluable.
Rating: Summary: Could you be any cooler?? Review: AMG's voluminous electronic music directory is cogent and exhaustive, sure to be a delight for the style's fans and non-fans alike. Fans will love this book for its thoroughness, its uber-cool, authoritative air and for its immense lack of humor, all of which seem reflective of the scene(s) it seeks to document. Non-fans will be delighted by the intensive devotion to ephemera and the belligerently academic tone which seeks to browbeat outsiders into accepting the worldview of a musical movement that hails each club opening as the birth of a new subgenre. Hundreds of artists and dozens of styles are outlined and their histories detailed with absolute, messianic precision. While AMG's level of writing is superior to most of its contemporaries, the tone is no less smug or evangelical; the sense of being intellectually bludgeoned will seem familiar to those of us who have watched the rise of electronica with wry but aggrieved detatchment. (Yes, I'm sure you love the stuff, but do you have to devote so much energy to coercing the rest of us into adopting your point of view?) All kidding aside, this book will be a definitive resource for years to come. Anyone interested in understanding the growth and self-perceptions of the electronic music cult will find this book invaluable.
Rating: Summary: As a Collector, Take my word for it.... Review: As a collector of many forms of Electronica new & old, I'm going to have to side with Matthew Collins on this one. The book is truely volumunous in it's bulk of basic biographical info on lots of dj's and groups, but it lacks the Discography information collectors crave. It's true that this book is great for a beginner I guess, but most of the people who would be willing to buy this are probably really into Techno & Electronica, and I would think would expect a little more than what seems to be a bunch of info from the Allmusic website on Biographies. It is worth it's price if you have cash to spare, and a spot on your shelf, but really, if you have the internet then just go to the website Allmusic.com for more info than there is in the book. And I have to say I agree with Mr Collins on "who the heck is Amon Duul" Maybe the group was an important figure in obscure indie-electro or something, but they're not a part of the Techno music that I love & know. And Prodigy is an awesome group, they just get bashed cause they got too popular, and I guess you can't be popular and be part of Electronica.
Rating: Summary: As a Collector, Take my word for it.... Review: As a collector of many forms of Electronica new & old, I'm going to have to side with Matthew Collins on this one. The book is truely volumunous in it's bulk of basic biographical info on lots of dj's and groups, but it lacks the Discography information collectors crave. It's true that this book is great for a beginner I guess, but most of the people who would be willing to buy this are probably really into Techno & Electronica, and I would think would expect a little more than what seems to be a bunch of info from the Allmusic website on Biographies. It is worth it's price if you have cash to spare, and a spot on your shelf, but really, if you have the internet then just go to the website Allmusic.com for more info than there is in the book. And I have to say I agree with Mr Collins on "who the heck is Amon Duul" Maybe the group was an important figure in obscure indie-electro or something, but they're not a part of the Techno music that I love & know. And Prodigy is an awesome group, they just get bashed cause they got too popular, and I guess you can't be popular and be part of Electronica.
Rating: Summary: Good now, getting less good every day Review: But that, of course, isn't really this particular book's fault, but rather the reality for any printed survey of a topic that's constantly evolving. Like previous reviewers have said, you might want to just checkout the allmusic web site, unless you're a freakishly obsessed collector or are using a gift certificate and feeling a little more free than usual with what you buy (like me).
Rating: Summary: Definitive Guide?!? Nah!!! Review: I picked up that book a while ago, thinking I had found some sort of Holy Grail. Reality check! This so-called definitive guide is so full of errors, omissions and such that even the most braindead raver could have made a better job! Not to mention that most of the bands/artists discography is incomplete. Being a life-long fan of electronic music (especially of Industrial & EBM) I couldn't help but noticed some insanities. Here a few. 1) Straight in the beginning of the book ("Brief Style Description" > Industrial Dance"). The authors are mentioning Front 242 (cool!)... but guess what? There is no entry for Front 242 in the "Definitive Guide"!!! Yeah, who cares about those belgians innovators who coined the style known as EBM (Electronic Body Music)? Laughable. 2) Now go to the Skinny Puppy entry. What's wrong with it? Read the first paragraph carefully. cEvin Key is listed as "the former singer of Images In Vogue". What??? That's new to me... I thought I heard Mr. Crompton himself said he only been the drummer (to pay the rent). Thanks guys to enlighten me. cEvin, you lied to us all Puppy fans! 3) Anyone remember the late Frank Tovey? You know, that guy from UK who made quite a sensation in the 80s on the electro scene? No? Fad Gadget was the name of his band... on Mute Records. Yep, sharing the slot with Depeche Mode... Remember now? Ok, another hint, his live performances were totally wild and his music minimalist? Well... don't worry if you don't remember, the authors didn't do any good either. 4) A tricky one now. Who inspired Wumpscut, Allied Vision, Leather Strip, Hocico and another handful of dark electro-industrial bands? They were german. No, not Kraftwerk. Another try? yelworC!!! But they doesn't count since they only released a handful of tapes, singles, and a full lenght album & an anthology before one of the former member left to create amGod. But I bet you never heard of them either. Nevermind, neither the authors of The Definitive Guide. 5) Talking about obscure bands, the authors did a remarkable job at ignoring Klinik, whom dark icy minimalist electro-industrial muzak didn't make much of a difference on the scene in the 80s. and the list drags on forever on multiple levels. The only point worth mentioning about this joke book is the efort the authors deployed to describe styles of electronic music, put them in categories and draw tables showing off ramifications. That alone prevail me from throwing the book away. Let's all consume large amount of MDMA and let's read the electronic bible while reading entries about obscure DJs that shaped the present music (and the one to come)!
Rating: Summary: Decent guide, but some strange choices Review: If you need a guide electronic music, and don't have a lot of access to the internet (and if you don't you probably won't be reading this review anyway), this is really the only source. However, I find that there is a lot missing from it. It deals with mostly mainstream artists, with a decent amount of independents. However, it seems to feature a very high concentration of dance music artists and DJs. Also, it includes some bizarre choices such as bands like Godspeed You Black Emperor, Sigur Ros, Labradford, Mogwai and other "post-rock" bands that really have little to do with electronic music. I love these bands, but it doesn't seem to me that they belong in this book. I also find a lot of their reviews to be very harsh toward experimental music and overly praising of more unoriginal genres.
Rating: Summary: Decent guide, but some strange choices Review: If you need a guide electronic music, and don't have a lot of access to the internet (and if you don't you probably won't be reading this review anyway), this is really the only source. However, I find that there is a lot missing from it. It deals with mostly mainstream artists, with a decent amount of independents. However, it seems to feature a very high concentration of dance music artists and DJs. Also, it includes some bizarre choices such as bands like Godspeed You Black Emperor, Sigur Ros, Labradford, Mogwai and other "post-rock" bands that really have little to do with electronic music. I love these bands, but it doesn't seem to me that they belong in this book. I also find a lot of their reviews to be very harsh toward experimental music and overly praising of more unoriginal genres.
Rating: Summary: From Kraftwerk to Amon to Aphex Twin Review: Just a reply to Matthew here in terms of the prolificness of Amon Duul compared to the Prodigy. Theres absolutely nothing prolific about the Prodigy, not compared to the real innovators from Amon Duul to Kraftwerk to Aphex Twin ( who is the king of all electronic music the last decade). Amon Duul is extremely important in a lot of the electronic music groundwork, so thats why there are 2 and a half pages compared to the Prodigy , who are just a pop/dance band and merely entertaining to watch. It's not about who ones likes , its about who truly is and was important in electronic music. It's good to be diverse in liking different styles and all that, even though I dont understand liking a true innovator such as an Aphex Twin in the same vein as Armin van Buuren, DJ Tiesto, Ferry Corsten or Anti-loop who are the most one dimensional, generic/teeny bopper-techno acts/Dj's around.
|