Rating: 
Summary: Animal Farm is the Heezy!
Review: I thought that this book was the best book that I have ever read. I like this book because they talk about animal life, and how the animals treat each other. I think that the animals treat each other unfairly. The reason that they treat each other badly is because the animals don't respect the rules at all, they break the rules, and the animals just do anything they want. The reason that they don't listen to the rules is because they think it is a free country but it is not. The animals break everything they see. I think that it is not right to let animals drink alcohol, sleep in beds, and live in the house.
Rating:
Summary: THE BEST BOOK I READ THIS YEAR "ANIMAL FARM"
Review: This was the best book I read this year and I think i mite read one or two more times. My favorit carictor is box I think I am kind of like hime in a why. But in most all books there has to be someone you don't like. The carictor I didn't like was squiler the reason I didn't like him was he just talked too good. in concusion I just wanted to say I love the book.
Rating: 
Summary: Good animal Bad animal
Review: I don't like the animal farm because I don't like animals. It is taking about animals and nothing eles. I hope that I will like animals someday, but not now. If I like animals I think I will read it again. I recommand for the kids like animal.
Rating:
Summary: READ THE BEST YOU CAN READ "ANIMAL FARM"
Review: (Ayoung Heezy from Oakdeezy,this Book is of the Heezy). If you do not feel good, this book could make you feel better and get you back up on your feet. This Book was a good book because It tells you about the Revolutionary War but in another way using animals not people. In the book it has two sets of animals the sets are good animals and bad animals, It tells you about a Farm that was owned by a man and his wife called Mr. and Mrs. Jones, and hoe they held the animals badly on the farm and how the animals did not like it, so they had made a plan to get the owners off the farm. That's how they came up with that name "Animal Farm" Because the animals were the only creatures on the farm. I think if any body likes to learn new things in another way, they should read Animal Farm. See you later I'm out, A Young G call Big HenDeezy.
Rating: 
Summary: DON''T READ THIS BOOK!
Review: This was the most wrose book that i have ever read. It was about some aniamls taking over a farm just because they felt miss taking care of. So the "take over the fram". And then realy took over. The pigs(that is). So this book was realy boring.
Rating:
Summary: Do not read this
Review: this is a week book it do not make sciens to how can some shitty pig take over a fram if i was boxer i would kick the shit out of them to me the animal is the stupit animal in the whole wide wrold
Rating:
Summary: Animal Farm is off the HEEZY
Review: What's crackulating? I thought Animal Farm was the best book I've read this year! I especially liked the fact that it was a metaphor for the human condition, and that while it specifically spoofed the Communist Revolution in Russia, elements of Squealer and Napoleon can be seen in our own George W. Bush. I also appreciated the characters of Boxer, Benjamin and Clover, but I thought the sheep were annoying with their continuous bleating. Lastly, I appreciated the overall message at the end of the book: that power corrupts all. In conclusion, I thought this to be a fine read for all. Peace Out, The Waterboy
Rating: 
Summary: Animals Take over
Review: Orwell's "Animal Farm" was on of the most entertaining books I have ever read. It is about a group of animals that lived on a farm, rebelled against the humans to lead their lives, but then when one of their own animals rules, the conclusion is that the animals becomes like a human, and the animals had gained nothing. The novel starts of by explaining Mr. Jones, the farm owner. The description of him was very mean, however, I personally do not think that Mr. Jones is all that bad. It seems that he used physical abuse in the means to organize and control, but did not use this strategy to his extreme. The Pigs are supposed to be the wisest. Orwell's satire of human nature is quite funny, making a pig a symbol of a human, and then when that pig (Napoleon) is corrupted with power, becomes a human. Besides politics, there were many historical allusions, biblical allusions, and a bit of stereotypes. The historical allusions consisted of communism, Hitler, and dictatorship. Napoleon, the leader of the animals, was power-hungry, and in turn became a dictator. In the beginning, animal farm was trying to make a utopian society using the method of communism, that all the animals should be treated equal. However, communism is the ideal society; it did not work for our world because of other factors, the method itself. Soon, Napoleon became a dictator and the method died. Napoleon can be compared with Hitler because Hitler tried to make a separation of line between the Germans and the Jews as Napoleon made that line with the animals to humans. In a wryly remark, the names of the animals played as a stereotype with the type of animal that they were. Boxer, the horse, was a hard working animal that always believed that if he listens and just "works harder" then true happiness can come for it. This reminds me of an actual boxer because boxers work hard one on one with their coach for better results, and do not question it. There was another comparison that I made while reading "Animal Farm", the connection with Golding's "Lord of the Flies" and "Animal Farm". Both stories are a bit equivalent. "Lord of the Flies" consists of boys stranded on an island so they make their societies, which in turn is divided by good and evil, but the evil is corrupted then restored at the end of the book. "Animal Farm" has somewhat of a same kind of tone. There are these animals that wish to have more rights and freedom so they rebel against Mr. Jones (and any other humans), Napoleon gets corrupted that he chases away Snowball (other pig that was in power with him) so he can have all the power. All the rules are broken, and at the end the farm is restored as it was in the beginning, but with more corruption. The rules were called the Seven commandments. This makes a religious allusion. The animals try to obey the rules, combining the theory of church and state. However, all the rules are broken by Napoleon, but must be obeyed by the pigs. Overall, I personally enjoyed this book. It is entreating, short, and had many of these little allusions that make it quite humorous.
Rating:
Summary: Amazing novel for 1945¿.good one for today.
Review: This book is a fable, Orwell's prediction of how Communism would work. The story is about how a bunch of animals took over a farm from humans, installing a government that started working perfectly as it was based on idealistic concepts, but turned corrupt with time. An excellent plot review is available in this page's editorial review. The book is short and very easy too read (almost to easy), the narrative is simple and entertaining, again, like a fable. But what is the strongest side of Animal Farm? For me, the time period when it was written. This means, that today you will enjoy this book, but not as much as somebody who read it when it was first published. For example, if you read the book thinking that it was written last year, you would probably think that it's ok, another interesting form of telling the story of Communism, but just that. To really appreciate the novel you have to bear in mind who Orwell was and when did he write the book. But it is definetely a worth reading novel, a well spent couple of hours.
Rating: 
Summary: How Could Animals Taste so Bland?
Review: Tastelessly Powerful By Luke Link This book was somewhat bland. It showed the outlook on communism versus sociallism and the actions Stallen and the communist government made, though was a litle tasteless. As a pleasure book, Animal Farm would not be a selection of mine. It is one of the more impacting books of our time, but yields little reading pleasure and detail. When I read through the book,I found that the analogies to the characters in which the book portrayed were accurate. Napoleon was written well and played the part of what would have been Stalin, well. All of the major players in the communist socialist game were personnified well in Animal Farm. This book has relevance today, in that it showed the outlook on events that occurred during the time of the communistically idealistic society, which impacted the thoughts of people and changed society to become a power hungry, consumer dependant socialist government, well, I guess there is a plus and a minus to everything. The words of this book have echoed through generations, and "The Beasts of England" has taken a more human-acceptable form, affecting us all, and our thankfully sociallist economy, greatly.
|
