<< 1 >>
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: New age Internet safe for our children? Review: I believe that the book enstilled frightening thoughts in my mind of the dangers available on the Internet. A must read book before you let your child use the information superhighway.
Rating: ![3 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-3-0.gif) Summary: Started slow, got better; dated Review: I own but have not read Sex Laws and Cyberspace in its entirety. This is because the book is poorly written and hard to read.The book deals with cogent questions about types of pornography and legal problems in the theory and practice of censoring it. However, it appears Wallace and Mangan aimed at length instead of lucidity in each paragraph and chapter. Reading page after page of their rambling narrative is simply too much.
Rating: ![2 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-2-0.gif) Summary: Wordy, rambling, hard to follow Review: I own but have not read Sex Laws and Cyberspace in its entirety. This is because the book is poorly written and hard to read. The book deals with cogent questions about types of pornography and legal problems in the theory and practice of censoring it. However, it appears Wallace and Mangan aimed at length instead of lucidity in each paragraph and chapter. Reading page after page of their rambling narrative is simply too much.
Rating: ![3 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-3-0.gif) Summary: Started slow, got better; dated Review: The title of the review about sums everything up. It started off very slow and boring and I almost put it down. I was sick, however, and struggled on. The book gets a lot better in later chapters, but since it references the beginning a lot, you have to struggle through the beginning. There's some really good quotes in the last chapter. The use of traditionally offensive issues like online kiddie porn and violent "erotica" to illustrate the issues (in the beginning) was a decent attempt to shock the reader into re-examining digital law from other perspectives, but may backfire or upset some. As others have noted, though, it is quite dated.
<< 1 >>
|