Home :: Books :: Christianity  

Arts & Photography
Audio CDs
Audiocassettes
Biographies & Memoirs
Business & Investing
Children's Books
Christianity

Comics & Graphic Novels
Computers & Internet
Cooking, Food & Wine
Entertainment
Gay & Lesbian
Health, Mind & Body
History
Home & Garden
Horror
Literature & Fiction
Mystery & Thrillers
Nonfiction
Outdoors & Nature
Parenting & Families
Professional & Technical
Reference
Religion & Spirituality
Romance
Science
Science Fiction & Fantasy
Sports
Teens
Travel
Women's Fiction
Covenant, Community, and the Common Good: An Interpretation of Christian Ethics

Covenant, Community, and the Common Good: An Interpretation of Christian Ethics

List Price: $20.00
Your Price: $13.60
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: A much-needed corrective
Review: American society and the associations that constitute it are breaking down. The cultural consensus, if there ever was one, is more in disarray now than every before in history. In order to address the situation, the meaning-makers of our culture have posited a variety of approaches, from the liberal to the communitarian with the revisionist liberals and societal communitarians in between, in search of the one that will provide the return to order for which we all groan. In Covenant, Community, and the Common Good: An Interpretation of Christian Ethics, author and ethicist Eric Mount Jr. surveys and critiques the major positions espoused by various schools of ethics as represented by a wide range of individual thinkers and, picking and choosing judiciously among them, constructs the theological base for what might be called a hybrid model of ethics which he invites the culture to consider--that of community based on covenant and the common good. In the first two chapters Mount looks at the concepts of covenant from the Hebraic heritage and of the common good as put forth by Aristotle, pointing out strengths and shortcomings of each, particularly in their historical manifestations. In chapters three, four and five he seeks to discover a "middle way" which will help us claim and reclaim the positive values of covenant and the common good while correcting the abusive ways in which these organizing principles have been applied. Mount seeks "starting points"(51) in considering the very real issues of various levels and forms of community: the family, the venues of national commerce and politics, and the global community. As a case in point, he considers society's grappling with homosexuality in light of the work of Max Stackhouse and Paula M. Cooey. Each beginning with the same Reformed tradition, Genesis creation story, and covenant as their central norm, Stackhouse develops a thesis which supports the traditional view of homosexuality, while Cooey's thesis critiques the traditional view and elevates difference and relationship over law and order, an approach in which Mount finds greater promise for social consensus. (66-67) For Mount, community involves that which gives each member "a sense of identity connected to a center of loyalty, the sense of responsibility, the respect for diversity, and the openness to participation in decisions."(31) He has done an excellent job in providing examples of ways in which this community can be realized in the workplace, the home, politics, schools, religious institutions, and the multiple other venues and associations. His fundamental approach is dialogical. "(F)acilitating communication and modeling respect for difference, sensitivity to need, and commitment to the values of liberty and justice for all"(154) must be central to the process. In the end, Mount calls for the development of the "civic virtues" of faith, hope, love and gratitude: "faith as openness to the other, love as affirmation of the other and compassion toward the other, hope as the expectant patience to keep public discourse alive, and generous public-spiritedness as the manifestation of gratitude."(154) Promoting and enfleshing these virtues will help us "approach and perhaps even accomplish that delicate balance between individual liberty and communal solidarity that revisionist liberals and societal communitarians seek."(156-157) Thus, covenantal commitments, community that affirms and respects difference, and the valuation of the table where all are welcome and all are valued as a common good might combine to provide a basis for ethics in this postmodern era to which all may subscribe. I have great sympathy for Mount's development of the ethical base of covenant and the common good in community. Heeding him could provide a much-needed corrective to the unhealthy tendencies evident in much of the church and society today.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: A much-needed corrective
Review: American society and the associations that constitute it are breaking down. The cultural consensus, if there ever was one, is more in disarray now than every before in history. In order to address the situation, the meaning-makers of our culture have posited a variety of approaches, from the liberal to the communitarian with the revisionist liberals and societal communitarians in between, in search of the one that will provide the return to order for which we all groan. In Covenant, Community, and the Common Good: An Interpretation of Christian Ethics, author and ethicist Eric Mount Jr. surveys and critiques the major positions espoused by various schools of ethics as represented by a wide range of individual thinkers and, picking and choosing judiciously among them, constructs the theological base for what might be called a hybrid model of ethics which he invites the culture to consider--that of community based on covenant and the common good. In the first two chapters Mount looks at the concepts of covenant from the Hebraic heritage and of the common good as put forth by Aristotle, pointing out strengths and shortcomings of each, particularly in their historical manifestations. In chapters three, four and five he seeks to discover a "middle way" which will help us claim and reclaim the positive values of covenant and the common good while correcting the abusive ways in which these organizing principles have been applied. Mount seeks "starting points"(51) in considering the very real issues of various levels and forms of community: the family, the venues of national commerce and politics, and the global community. As a case in point, he considers society's grappling with homosexuality in light of the work of Max Stackhouse and Paula M. Cooey. Each beginning with the same Reformed tradition, Genesis creation story, and covenant as their central norm, Stackhouse develops a thesis which supports the traditional view of homosexuality, while Cooey's thesis critiques the traditional view and elevates difference and relationship over law and order, an approach in which Mount finds greater promise for social consensus. (66-67) For Mount, community involves that which gives each member "a sense of identity connected to a center of loyalty, the sense of responsibility, the respect for diversity, and the openness to participation in decisions."(31) He has done an excellent job in providing examples of ways in which this community can be realized in the workplace, the home, politics, schools, religious institutions, and the multiple other venues and associations. His fundamental approach is dialogical. "(F)acilitating communication and modeling respect for difference, sensitivity to need, and commitment to the values of liberty and justice for all"(154) must be central to the process.In the end, Mount calls for the development of the "civic virtues" of faith, hope, love and gratitude: "faith as openness to the other, love as affirmation of the other and compassion toward the other, hope as the expectant patience to keep public discourse alive, and generous public-spiritedness as the manifestation of gratitude."(154) Promoting and enfleshing these virtues will help us "approach and perhaps even accomplish that delicate balance between individual liberty and communal solidarity that revisionist liberals and societal communitarians seek."(156-157) Thus, covenantal commitments, community that affirms and respects difference, and the valuation of the table where all are welcome and all are valued as a common good might combine to provide a basis for ethics in this postmodern era to which all may subscribe. I have great sympathy for Mount's development of the ethical base of covenant and the common good in community. Heeding him could provide a much-needed corrective to the unhealthy tendencies evident in much of the church and society today.


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates