<< 1 >>
Rating: Summary: The Rock Rebellion Revisited Review: As far as I can tell, this is the same book as Faith, God, and Rock and Roll, just a later edition by a different publisher with a different cover. Baker Books added the subtitle and dropped the tatoo cover in favor of this more nondescript one for its 2004 printing. But it leads to mix-ups, and in some Amazon ads, they seem to be two different books, even being sold together for a special price. (So get one or the other version, but not both).This book is a follow-up to Mark Joseph's The Rock and Roll Rebellion (which also had a long subtitle), which profiled a number of artists to make the point that they'd be better off staying in the musical mainstream rather than getting shuttled off with the misleading label of "Christian Rock" artists, a nearly universally derided term, or even worse, "Contemporary Christian Musicians" or CCM for short, named, again misleadingly, for a magazine called CCM. That thesis also underscores Mark Allen Powell's Encyclopaedia of Contemporary Christian Music, which is similarly critical of the CCM subculture. The point is more obvious in Powell's original title, Parallel Worlds, A Critical View of Popular Christian Music (which was changed by the publisher to the present title which implies uncritical acceptance of this "parallel world." Both books share their thesis with another book that wasn't primarily about music at all, Bob Briner's Roaring Lambs. In one way, these three books hook together. Joseph was both inspired and encouraged by Briner, and rather than bemoaning the sad cul de sac in which many artists find themselves, Powell in his book is bringing these artists' achievements out for assessment in the common light of day. Both Joseph and Powell are effectively treading new ground: not only acquainting us with "new" artists and music we may have missed, but at the same time giving us great rock writing.
Rating: Summary: ...sometimes as imbalanced as the fundies he critiques Review: This book has its merits. Mark Joseph loves rock music and has some great insights and biographical gems on the bands (some famous, some less well-known). As a result of reading this book I think I added about 10 albums to my wish list.
Joseph's central thesis is also well-argued: Christian musicians are better off remaining in the mainstream of teh musical culture, rather than allowing themslves to be exiled to the ghetto of "Christian music." Once they are labeled CCM, they lose most of their potential aduience, they lose the freedoms to be creative, and they are now subject to the whims of a sub-culture that is even more banal and artless than that of secular pop music. Joseph makes a good case for this.
Baker has packaged the book decently enough too, though it suffers from a lack of an index.
Where this book disappointed me:
1. The writing. While at times Joseph shows the ability to soar, most of the time its pretty cliched and workmanlike. His style on its own did not keep you reading.
2. At times Joseph is just as one-dimensional as the fundamentalists he (rightly) critiques. For example, his loyalty to rock is such that he is unable to serious grapple with critiques like those of folsk like Charles Colson or Nancy Pearcey, who wonder whether the music's style inherantly appeals to the emotions over reason and thus has some limitations. Joseph seems incapable of both loving the music and at the same time acknowledging its potential weaknesses.
Another example of this -- Joseph is eager to defend certain musicians' right (against ham-handed fundy's condemnations) to be less than orthodox and ask questions in their music. But can he not do that while also critiquing their theology. So Joseph will celebrate such-and-such musicians' proclamation that the God they celebrate in their songs is not the Christian God or a Muslim god or any other god, but the 'god I see when I look in my child's eyes, the god of nature...' It seems to me that Joseph is not taking these bands seriously enough in sometimes being uncritically affirming of all they say and do.
Anyway, this was an enjoyable, thought-provoking read, even though I found it a little disappointing.
<< 1 >>
|