Rating: 
Summary: The Standard Text for a Good Reason
Review: If you are going to buy the Old Testament in Hebrew than this is the one to buy. It is the standard that is used by almost all scholars. It is the one we used in my University courses. If that doesn't convince you the introduction will. It is a lengthy descripiton of how the text came to be and about the various scholars who worked on it. Furthermorre it explains the many footnotes which show variations in the Targum, Syriac, and other famous editions. It's worth the price.
Rating:
Summary: The Standard Text for a Good Reason
Review: If you are going to buy the Old Testament in Hebrew than this is the one to buy. It is the standard that is used by almost all scholars. It is the one we used in my University courses. If that doesn't convince you the introduction will. It is a lengthy descripiton of how the text came to be and about the various scholars who worked on it. Furthermorre it explains the many footnotes which show variations in the Targum, Syriac, and other famous editions. It's worth the price.
Rating:
Summary: The definitive Hebrew Text
Review: If you want to read the Tanakh, read BHS.
Rating:
Summary: Of Course!
Review: Most of what needs to be said about this text has already been said, so let me highlight a few things and let you buy it.1.[...] 2. Buying the large print is suggested for 2 reasons: 1) It's easier to read (or yes, get the small print for almost the same price, and also buy a magnifier to help your eyes if you want; but then you will have paid the price for the large print); 2) It's only a few dollars more than the harder-to-read small print. 3. Buying the large print, though tough to carry to class, is no big deal. Buy an ABS, noncritical copy of BHS for $9.95 for the classroom. When the Hebrew class goes into the lessons for the critical apparatus, then lug the thing in for a few weeks. When done, leave the big book home. 4. Regarding the Hebrew text, it must be remembered that the vowel points and cantillation marks are, in fact, an interpretation, usually correct but occasionally can be pointed differently. Example:
"There are interesting cases where the cantillations seem not to follow the divisions you'd expect (not always for melodic or prosodic reasons), and seem to constitute a sort of simultaneous commentary on the text. My favorite example is the phrase in Deut. 26:5, "'arami 'oved 'avi". The simple interpretation, correct in the context, would be "My father was a wandering Aramean." In the passover seder service, though, the verse is
read with a different parsing and meaning, for the purposes of exegesis: "An Aramean [tried to] destroy my father." Interestingly, the cantillations agree with the latter, homiletical interpretation, and not the former one."--M. E. Shoulson 5. The consonantal text, as Gesenius states, has more corruption than we may want to admit, but also, it's not enough to question the authority of the text. The correct consonantal text is 99% of the time discernible. These corruptions arose before the scribes of the BC days began to be more careful. Afterward, the preservation of the text was so stringent that even the known corruptions were preserved up to the time of the Masoretes; and they continued to do so, but provided the corrections. 6. The Masorets who pointed the text with vowel points did make relatively unimportant mistakes, sort of like anyone misspelling a word, using the right consonants but using the wrong vowel, such as "certin" for "cerain." Sometimes, they even ended up creating what we consider nonsense words. BUt corrections are available through the critical apparatus or Gesenius to name a couple sources. 7. The critical apparatus serves as a kind of internal commentary to the text, providing alternate readings according to other manuscripts and traditions. In my opinion, this is far better than following the similar critical information found in an English Bible. The Masoretes were scholars, living closer to the original text, living in religious Hebrew understanding, speakers of Hebrew. They were the keepers of a long tradition for preserving the text. So, I would tend to trust a Masorete a bit more than an English-speaking Hebrew Scholar, of which there are many liberals more interested in putting their personal views and issues into the text rather than trying to preserve in English what the Hebrew really says, like it or not. So, the BHS text is a must for the serious Hebrew student, and for reasons of financial common sense and eye care, buy the bigger one.
Rating:
Summary: Of Course!
Review: Most of what needs to be said about this text has already been said, so let me highlight a few things and let you buy it. 1.[...] 2. Buying the large print is suggested for 2 reasons: 1) It's easier to read (or yes, get the small print for almost the same price, and also buy a magnifier to help your eyes if you want; but then you will have paid the price for the large print); 2) It's only a few dollars more than the harder-to-read small print. 3. Buying the large print, though tough to carry to class, is no big deal. Buy an ABS, noncritical copy of BHS for $9.95 for the classroom. When the Hebrew class goes into the lessons for the critical apparatus, then lug the thing in for a few weeks. When done, leave the big book home. 4. Regarding the Hebrew text, it must be remembered that the vowel points and cantillation marks are, in fact, an interpretation, usually correct but occasionally can be pointed differently. Example:
"There are interesting cases where the cantillations seem not to follow the divisions you'd expect (not always for melodic or prosodic reasons), and seem to constitute a sort of simultaneous commentary on the text. My favorite example is the phrase in Deut. 26:5, "'arami 'oved 'avi". The simple interpretation, correct in the context, would be "My father was a wandering Aramean." In the passover seder service, though, the verse is
read with a different parsing and meaning, for the purposes of exegesis: "An Aramean [tried to] destroy my father." Interestingly, the cantillations agree with the latter, homiletical interpretation, and not the former one."--M. E. Shoulson 5. The consonantal text, as Gesenius states, has more corruption than we may want to admit, but also, it's not enough to question the authority of the text. The correct consonantal text is 99% of the time discernible. These corruptions arose before the scribes of the BC days began to be more careful. Afterward, the preservation of the text was so stringent that even the known corruptions were preserved up to the time of the Masoretes; and they continued to do so, but provided the corrections. 6. The Masorets who pointed the text with vowel points did make relatively unimportant mistakes, sort of like anyone misspelling a word, using the right consonants but using the wrong vowel, such as "certin" for "cerain." Sometimes, they even ended up creating what we consider nonsense words. BUt corrections are available through the critical apparatus or Gesenius to name a couple sources. 7. The critical apparatus serves as a kind of internal commentary to the text, providing alternate readings according to other manuscripts and traditions. In my opinion, this is far better than following the similar critical information found in an English Bible. The Masoretes were scholars, living closer to the original text, living in religious Hebrew understanding, speakers of Hebrew. They were the keepers of a long tradition for preserving the text. So, I would tend to trust a Masorete a bit more than an English-speaking Hebrew Scholar, of which there are many liberals more interested in putting their personal views and issues into the text rather than trying to preserve in English what the Hebrew really says, like it or not. So, the BHS text is a must for the serious Hebrew student, and for reasons of financial common sense and eye care, buy the bigger one.
Rating:
Summary: Essential Resource
Review: The Biblia Hebraica is an essential resource for anyone who wants to do serious study of the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament. This edition, while being heavy and impractical for carrying to class, has the advantage of comfortably large type and a very clear font. The page layout is very good. This large edition costs only a few dollars more than the small edition by the same publisher. It is well worth the difference.
Rating:
Summary: Everything You Need In a Hebrew Bible
Review: The font is a readable size, the binding and covers are solid, and there's no...dust jacket to quibble over. Just wish it was a smooth cover rather than cloth, but oh well... (and I wish it came in black). But other than this minutia, get this if you're looking to invest in a Hebrew Bible.
Rating:
Summary: Everything You Need In a Hebrew Bible
Review: The font is a readable size, the binding and covers are solid, and there's no...dust jacket to quibble over. Just wish it was a smooth cover rather than cloth, but oh well... (and I wish it came in black). But other than this minutia, get this if you're looking to invest in a Hebrew Bible.
Rating: 
Summary: The Academic & Translational Standard
Review: The importance of BHS is not necessarily its version of the Masora (edited by Gerard Weil) or textual notes (the part that varies from edition to edition), but that its text is the basis for the last generation (thirty years) of commentaries, translations, articles, monographs, &c., so that anyone who wants to use these tools knowledgeably needs to refer to the text of BHS in their own study, just as those who want to compare their favourite translation to the Hebrew or Aramaic text--a common motivation for students of Biblical Hebrew--needs to look at BHS. My rating of four stars reflects my own irritation with the numerous gratuitous textual footnotes based on an editor's concept of what Hebrew poetry (for example) should look like, and the editorial decision to represent (arrange) certain passages in otherwise narrative books as poetry. If one ignores the textual notes, of course, the former is not an issue, and as long as the reader remembers that the manuscript upon which this is based does not reflect "poetic" layout, the latter concern is also laid aside.
Rating: 
Summary: Large Font?
Review: This book claims to be written in a large font, however the font is barely larger than the paperback edition. The large print edition is at most 2 points larger than the paperback, maybe a 12 or 13 point font. What makes this book bigger is the extra space at the bottom of the page which is not all that usefull for making notes. This edition is poorly laid out for enjoyable reading and useful notation. Don't waste you money to get this so called "large print" edition, you should probably just buy the regular sized one.
| 
