Little Miss Magic (Mr. Men and Little Miss)

Rating:
Summary: Little Miss Magic
Review: I like this book because it is fun to read and easy. I also Like this book because it had great pictures. I think People of all ages should readthis book!!!

Rating:
Summary: Little Miss Magic; Social intolerance or harmless fun?
Review: It is well known that children process and learn information at an early age better than when they are older. Roger Hargreaves knows this fact and has chosen his children's books as a medium for conveying his bigotry and fascist principles he lives on. I will be analyzing Little Miss Magic in-depth and discussing not only plot developments but also the implications that could follow.

It's easy to notice that almost all characters living in Miss Magic's social arena are fairly similar in their stature; short, lacking necks and fully developed torsos. On the other hand their skin tones vary considerably. Once would think this diversity of complexions would promote tolerance and is no doubt a mark of the author's racial attitude. However upon reading how Miss Magic justifies her treatment of Mr. Tickle, it becomes quite obvious that his form of expression is an excuse for her dogmatism.

Not only did Miss Magic unscrupulously violate Mr. Tickle, she did so without dialogue or tact. Learning these traits are important in calming tensions that might otherwise lead to violence. By discovering the reasons behind one's intentions we can better understand what motivates them and possibly resolve issues diplomatically. It seems for all Miss Magic's gifts lie many shortcomings.

It is quite possible that Mr. Tickle was unaware of the way his actions were negatively affecting others. Most of the feedback he received was in the form of "moans", "groans" and "quivering". From a subjective standpoint these responses could be interpreted according to ones wishes. None of these 'victims' tried to reason with Mr. Tickle clearly on a one-to-one basis. Who was the real victim of this book?

Page 10 highlights an important philosophical point. What is fairness? I don't believe Mr. Hargreaves answers this question objectively. The illustration shows the majority smiling at Mr. Tickle's misfortune in much the same way Mr. Tickle smiled at them earlier. Is this fairness? It is right for our children to judge and punish others without their say while they delight in their misery?

It seems very plausible that although Mr. Tickle and Miss Magic share the same social strata their upbringings were quite different. In Freudian psychology we learn how one's childhood plays an important role in their social orientation. From the beginning it is clear Miss Magic has grown up with supreme control of all her belongings; her knife, her door, her toothbrush, etc.. When she leaves her house she takes this control mentality with her and objectifies people for personal gain.