The London Monster: A Sanguinary Tale

Rating:
Summary: A cautionary tale....
Review: Even as I write, the region of Delhi, India, is in the grip of a panic: a mysterious "monkey man" is attacking people all over the area, scratching them with long metal claws! At least two people have died in a panic attempting to escape after someone cried that the monkey man had come, falling downstairs or off roofs. However, in no case is there the slightest physical evidence, either of an attacker or of an attack.

In what I believe is his fourth book, Jan Bondeson tells us all the facts concerning a possibly similar case in 1790 London, in which the "London Monster" slashed women with a knife (or a blade hidden in a nosegay of artificial flowers, or with spurs fixed to his knees or his toes, or, or, or...). Was this a case of mass panic, as in India, or was it the work of one man, or the confluence of many otherwise independent "copycat crimes," and was the man arrested, convicted and sentenced guilty or innocent? Bondeson covers all the possibilities in an admirably even-handed manner.

London in 1790 was a strange place to modern eyes, and perhaps strangest of all was the almost total absence of any law enforcement agency. In the rare instances that people were convicted of crimes, the death penalty was meted out for even the most trivial offenses. In one of the most notorious cases, a starving woman picked up a bit of linen, perhaps tempted to steal it, but lost her nerve and immediately put it back. Observed by the shopkeeper, she was brought before a magistrate, tried, convicted and executed! Bondeson gives us all the needed background to appreciate all the circumstances of the "London Monster" case.

In fact my only reservations about the book involve its printing. Only two fonts are used, a text font that is quite unattractive to the eye, and an italic font which does not match in either size or style to the normal text font. The very yellowish paper used makes the ink seem much greyer than it actually is, and the book overall is a very unattractive (and unfortunately very typical) university press product. It might pay to wait for a mass-market trade paperback.

Rating:
Summary: A cautionary tale....
Review: Even as I write, the region of Delhi, India, is in the grip of a panic: a mysterious "monkey man" is attacking people all over the area, scratching them with long metal claws! At least two people have died in a panic attempting to escape after someone cried that the monkey man had come, falling downstairs or off roofs. However, in no case is there the slightest physical evidence, either of an attacker or of an attack.

In what I believe is his fourth book, Jan Bondeson tells us all the facts concerning a possibly similar case in 1790 London, in which the "London Monster" slashed women with a knife (or a blade hidden in a nosegay of artificial flowers, or with spurs fixed to his knees or his toes, or, or, or...). Was this a case of mass panic, as in India, or was it the work of one man, or the confluence of many otherwise independent "copycat crimes," and was the man arrested, convicted and sentenced guilty or innocent? Bondeson covers all the possibilities in an admirably even-handed manner.

London in 1790 was a strange place to modern eyes, and perhaps strangest of all was the almost total absence of any law enforcement agency. In the rare instances that people were convicted of crimes, the death penalty was meted out for even the most trivial offenses. In one of the most notorious cases, a starving woman picked up a bit of linen, perhaps tempted to steal it, but lost her nerve and immediately put it back. Observed by the shopkeeper, she was brought before a magistrate, tried, convicted and executed! Bondeson gives us all the needed background to appreciate all the circumstances of the "London Monster" case.

In fact my only reservations about the book involve its printing. Only two fonts are used, a text font that is quite unattractive to the eye, and an italic font which does not match in either size or style to the normal text font. The very yellowish paper used makes the ink seem much greyer than it actually is, and the book overall is a very unattractive (and unfortunately very typical) university press product. It might pay to wait for a mass-market trade paperback.

Rating:
Summary: The Ripper's Predecessor
Review: Everyone knows of Jack the Ripper, but you probably don't know of The London Monster. You won't forget him after reading _The London Monster: A Sanguinary Tale_ (University of Pennsylvania Press) by Jan Bondeson. Bondeson is a physician who lives in London, and whose previous books include _The Feejee Mermaid_, a look at various "unnatural" specimens like fake mermaids and vegetable lambs. His current book is a gothic-comic history, full of unnatural specimens such as a hero known as "The Catamite" and "The Cowardly Fishmonger," unreliable alibi witnesses who worked in an artificial flower factory, corrupt judges, and The Monster himself, Rhynwick Williams, or maybe it wasn't.

The Monster had a career of crime not of disemboweling his victims as his criminal descendant The Ripper did, but of following them in the street, insulting them, cutting their clothes, slicing their buttocks, and making his foul and stealthy escape into the night. He also would approach a woman, insist that she examine the bouquet of artificial flowers he carried, and then cut her with a blade concealed in the bouquet. His exploits were heavily covered by the press; one reporter wrote that certain ladies had been "wounded by some MONSTER (for such the perpetrator of such horrid deed must be, as there was not one but laid strong claims to beauty)." His career lasted from 1788 to 1790, and Bondeson lists fifty-eight women who were his supposed victims. Such a list is highly questionable, because of the notoriety of The Monster. Newspapers, poems, caricatures, and posters for rewards (all well reproduced here) meant many false leads.

Not only has Bondeson described the career of The Monster with verve and humor, but he has given a brief history of similar episodes of "epidemic hysteria." While it is true that there was a Monster, and he did cut ladies up, the exaggerated response of the public was similar to the phantom gas attacks by the nonexistent Mad Anesthetist of Illinois in 1944, or the Halifax [England] Slasher of 1926 in which people were cut up, but it turned out they were cut up by their own selves. Bondeson has thrown light on the forgotten crime spree that was a sensation in its time, and has given a picture of how justice, and tabloid justice, worked two hundred years ago. A sanguinary tale indeed.

Rating:
Summary: The Ripper's Predecessor
Review: Everyone knows of Jack the Ripper, but you probably don't know of The London Monster. You won't forget him after reading _The London Monster: A Sanguinary Tale_ (University of Pennsylvania Press) by Jan Bondeson. Bondeson is a physician who lives in London, and whose previous books include _The Feejee Mermaid_, a look at various "unnatural" specimens like fake mermaids and vegetable lambs. His current book is a gothic-comic history, full of unnatural specimens such as a hero known as "The Catamite" and "The Cowardly Fishmonger," unreliable alibi witnesses who worked in an artificial flower factory, corrupt judges, and The Monster himself, Rhynwick Williams, or maybe it wasn't.

The Monster had a career of crime not of disemboweling his victims as his criminal descendant The Ripper did, but of following them in the street, insulting them, cutting their clothes, slicing their buttocks, and making his foul and stealthy escape into the night. He also would approach a woman, insist that she examine the bouquet of artificial flowers he carried, and then cut her with a blade concealed in the bouquet. His exploits were heavily covered by the press; one reporter wrote that certain ladies had been "wounded by some MONSTER (for such the perpetrator of such horrid deed must be, as there was not one but laid strong claims to beauty)." His career lasted from 1788 to 1790, and Bondeson lists fifty-eight women who were his supposed victims. Such a list is highly questionable, because of the notoriety of The Monster. Newspapers, poems, caricatures, and posters for rewards (all well reproduced here) meant many false leads.

Not only has Bondeson described the career of The Monster with verve and humor, but he has given a brief history of similar episodes of "epidemic hysteria." While it is true that there was a Monster, and he did cut ladies up, the exaggerated response of the public was similar to the phantom gas attacks by the nonexistent Mad Anesthetist of Illinois in 1944, or the Halifax [England] Slasher of 1926 in which people were cut up, but it turned out they were cut up by their own selves. Bondeson has thrown light on the forgotten crime spree that was a sensation in its time, and has given a picture of how justice, and tabloid justice, worked two hundred years ago. A sanguinary tale indeed.

Rating:
Summary: An Short, Entertaining Slice of Gruesome History
Review: Jan Bondeson's The London Monster (A Sanguinary Tale) is a marvelous look at the city of London in the 1790's through a horrifying story of terror and mania and a touch of humour. The tale will travel through the dark streets filled with shrieks as a stalker prowls along cutting both women's garments and flesh into the taverns where the Monster hunters gather and to the Old Bailey and the somewhat farcical trials of young Rhynwick Williams. The author keeps the story moving along at a brisk pace while yet still creating more than sufficient atmosphere for the reader almost to taste the London fog in the air while reading. In the last chapters he helpfully expands the scope of the book to give the reader a broader perspective on the case. A very entertaining and informative read to be saved especially for the history buffs when the nights grow a little longer and the wind howls just a little louder.

Rating:
Summary: An Short, Entertaining Slice of Gruesome History
Review: Jan Bondeson's The London Monster (A Sanguinary Tale) is a marvelous look at the city of London in the 1790's through a horrifying story of terror and mania and a touch of humour. The tale will travel through the dark streets filled with shrieks as a stalker prowls along cutting both women's garments and flesh into the taverns where the Monster hunters gather and to the Old Bailey and the somewhat farcical trials of young Rhynwick Williams. The author keeps the story moving along at a brisk pace while yet still creating more than sufficient atmosphere for the reader almost to taste the London fog in the air while reading. In the last chapters he helpfully expands the scope of the book to give the reader a broader perspective on the case. A very entertaining and informative read to be saved especially for the history buffs when the nights grow a little longer and the wind howls just a little louder.