Rating: 
Summary: One of the best biographies I've read in a long time.....
Review: ...And I've read quite a few biographies in my life! I liked this more than Catherine the Great, Henry VIII, Mary Queen of Scots, ... You get the idea. If you want a thoroughly enjoyable and enlightening book, that is also well-documented, you must read this book! I moped around for a week after I finished it! I hope you enjoy it too!
Rating: 
Summary: Very interesting read
Review: Despite a few flaws, Ronald McNair Scott's "Robert the Bruce" makes for a compelling read. Mel Gibson's Braveheart, with its exciting over dramatized life of William Wallace, another great Scottish hero, does a disservice to this Scottish patriot who succeeded in driving the British out of Scotland and restoring his nation's independence. Far from the rather weak leader in Gibson's film, Robert was a strategic and tactical genius, both in war and in politics. Moreover, one can only be struck how, in the age before mass warfare, his individual prowess at arms turned the tide of battle in several key skirmishes. Scott offers an excellent view into Robert's life in this short work. His background on Scotland is generally excellent and he does a good job brining several of Robert's cohorts to like -- a particular favorite of mine being Sir James Douglas, otherwise known as Black Douglas, who used clever strategy to kill out every English noble who dared take possession of his ancestral home. Other characters like King Edward and Robert's brother are also well flushed out. The weakness of this work, likely owing to its small size at 250 pages, is that it does not offer more of these in depth character portraits. The work could also have used more background placing England and Scotland into the European milieu of the period. Particularly vexing was the relative lack of maps, confusing when you are trying to follow Robert's exploits as he moves through every small town in Scotland. Despite these short comings, I still give this book strong recommendations for anyone looking for a good read on one of history's most brilliant diplomats and military commanders who is too often overlooked. Hopefully this work will correct the deficiency and give Robert the Bruce the appreciation he deserves, maybe even his own movie?
Rating:
Summary: An Inspiring Read
Review: Despite a few flaws, Ronald McNair Scott's "Robert the Bruce" makes for a compelling read. Mel Gibson's Braveheart, with its exciting over dramatized life of William Wallace, another great Scottish hero, does a disservice to this Scottish patriot who succeeded in driving the British out of Scotland and restoring his nation's independence. Far from the rather weak leader in Gibson's film, Robert was a strategic and tactical genius, both in war and in politics. Moreover, one can only be struck how, in the age before mass warfare, his individual prowess at arms turned the tide of battle in several key skirmishes. Scott offers an excellent view into Robert's life in this short work. His background on Scotland is generally excellent and he does a good job brining several of Robert's cohorts to like -- a particular favorite of mine being Sir James Douglas, otherwise known as Black Douglas, who used clever strategy to kill out every English noble who dared take possession of his ancestral home. Other characters like King Edward and Robert's brother are also well flushed out. The weakness of this work, likely owing to its small size at 250 pages, is that it does not offer more of these in depth character portraits. The work could also have used more background placing England and Scotland into the European milieu of the period. Particularly vexing was the relative lack of maps, confusing when you are trying to follow Robert's exploits as he moves through every small town in Scotland. Despite these short comings, I still give this book strong recommendations for anyone looking for a good read on one of history's most brilliant diplomats and military commanders who is too often overlooked. Hopefully this work will correct the deficiency and give Robert the Bruce the appreciation he deserves, maybe even his own movie?
Rating:
Summary: Entertaining. Informative...........
Review: For history buffs of period and place, I recommend reading this book as a comparison to Barron's "Scottish War of Independence", to ascertain the variations told of Bruce's life. It seems Barron's sources or, at least, his publication of same, are a bit more profuse than Scott's and the tale he tells is markedly different in some key areas. Nevertheless, Scott's "Robert the Bruce" is an engaging read that will entertain and inform any avid history reader. One should seek additional sources, however, for a more detailed description of the epic battle of Bannockburn - a nearly miraculous martial achievement of the gifted warrior, Bruce.
Rating:
Summary: Robert the Bruce
Review: I enjoyed the book. As I view it, it was intended to give a readable history of the man. Anyone who read it with the idea of it being exhaustively documented would be disappointed. As an example, was he born at Turberry Castle or somewhere else such as in England at Writtle. He matter-of-factly states it was Turnberry. I would expect someone with his name to assume so. Does it matter? Probably not. My point is that I think the book was written to read much like a novel, and bring out the salient points of a great man's life. His humanity is indeed shown. He made mistakes as all men do, and one can quibble about how he played both sides against the other to achieve his ends. He was a politician. But it clearly comes out that the man had great humanity and ended up being a great leader. Isn't that what counts in this life? How we end our journey. Ronald McNair Scott weaves a good picture of Good King Robert's journey for the general public to see. I came away with good feelings of the man and his accomplishments. History will always be debated, especially the history of Scotland, which is sparsely documented and filled with myth. That's fun play also; but for the emotion of the story, I like Mr. Scott's book.
Rating:
Summary: It blew me away!
Review: I read this book while doing some independent research on the history of Scotland. Like many people, I was fascinated with the story of William Wallace and had great admiration for his heroism. The more research I did, the more I began to discover that William Wallace was just the spark, the real blaze came with Robert the Bruce. This man proved to be amazingly cunning and resourceful, a fine man with a wonderful sense of humanity. This book really brought to life the tale of a king who really was a man of the people. This story starts where Braveheart ends. I highly recommend it to anyone with a taste for adventure and an interest in history. You will be blown away too!
Rating:
Summary: The Real Hero of Scotland
Review: If you enjoyed the movie Braveheart, and would like to look more in depth in the characters and events surrounding the Scottish War of Independance, this book will not fail to intrest you. Although portrayed as a relatively minor character in that film, Robert the Bruce was military and political genious and the driving force behind Scotland's independance.
Rating:
Summary: Fascinating Story
Review: Ronald McNair Scott has taken the legend of Robert the Bruce and shown exactly why this man has become revered throughout Scotland. What many readers may not understand is the complex series of events that unfolded prior to the popular histories that exist. Scott has wielded a strong sense of storytelling to bring both the personal and political side of Bruce to life. His willingness to delve into a myriad of events surrounding medieval Scotland and England and to come out of it with an easily read autobiography is a testament to both his tireless research and authorship. I would recommend this book not only to readers interested in history, but for anyone who enjoys a riveting tale of adventure and patriotism.
Rating:
Summary: The Bruce Legacy.
Review: Ronald McNair Scott in this work has given us a fast paced easy to read account of one of the greatest military leaders in history. Robert the Bruce is not always appreciated in America because he lacks the Hollywood image that Mel Gibson has lent to William Wallace. Wallace was no doubt a great hero of Scotland but it was Bruce who not only defeated the English but posed a very real threat to actually annex English territory. Scott does have a tendency to state as fact that which is only theory or an educated guess but given the state of affairs in 13th and 14th century Scotland any other tact would have led to a huge and hard to read tome that would have added little to the general understanding of Bruce. By deciding to write in this style Scott brings this great hero of Scotland to life for the reader and lets us see the greatness that was Robert The Bruce. Bruce's early decisions during the Wallace wars are explained by Scottish politics. Bruce's grandfather had laid claim to the Scottish throne but Edward I decided in favor of John Balliol, Lord of Galloway. Wallace always fought in the name of King John making it very hard for any of the Bruce faction to lend their full support to the cause. Once he established himself as King, Bruce faced the same problem from the Balliol faction. This divided state of affairs could very well have doomed Scotland had not Bruce taken action. He began with an action that seems to have haunted him for the rest of his life when he struck down the "Red" Comyn on the alter of Greyfriars church. Slowly the rest of the Balliol faction was subdued until Bruce was the unchallenged King of Scots. Scott manages to go into some detail of Bruce's battles with the English without getting the reader lost. In fact, I was able to clearly understand what happened and as I was reading these accounts I could almost see what was going on. Scott's ability to describe events with words is his greatest asset. One feels as if he is actually there side by side with The Bruce. This book is not the deep study of Robert The Bruce that some people may be looking for. It is however a good place for any reader to begin to understand the history of Scotland. After reading this book anyone who wishes to dig deeper will be ready for the challange. For someone who is simply after a quick and easy to understand history of Robert The Bruce I doubt you will find a better source.
Rating:
Summary: The Bruce Legacy.
Review: Ronald McNair Scott in this work has given us a fast paced easy to read account of one of the greatest military leaders in history. Robert the Bruce is not always appreciated in America because he lacks the Hollywood image that Mel Gibson has lent to William Wallace. Wallace was no doubt a great hero of Scotland but it was Bruce who not only defeated the English but posed a very real threat to actually annex English territory. Scott does have a tendency to state as fact that which is only theory or an educated guess but given the state of affairs in 13th and 14th century Scotland any other tact would have led to a huge and hard to read tome that would have added little to the general understanding of Bruce. By deciding to write in this style Scott brings this great hero of Scotland to life for the reader and lets us see the greatness that was Robert The Bruce. Bruce's early decisions during the Wallace wars are explained by Scottish politics. Bruce's grandfather had laid claim to the Scottish throne but Edward I decided in favor of John Balliol, Lord of Galloway. Wallace always fought in the name of King John making it very hard for any of the Bruce faction to lend their full support to the cause. Once he established himself as King, Bruce faced the same problem from the Balliol faction. This divided state of affairs could very well have doomed Scotland had not Bruce taken action. He began with an action that seems to have haunted him for the rest of his life when he struck down the "Red" Comyn on the alter of Greyfriars church. Slowly the rest of the Balliol faction was subdued until Bruce was the unchallenged King of Scots. Scott manages to go into some detail of Bruce's battles with the English without getting the reader lost. In fact, I was able to clearly understand what happened and as I was reading these accounts I could almost see what was going on. Scott's ability to describe events with words is his greatest asset. One feels as if he is actually there side by side with The Bruce. This book is not the deep study of Robert The Bruce that some people may be looking for. It is however a good place for any reader to begin to understand the history of Scotland. After reading this book anyone who wishes to dig deeper will be ready for the challange. For someone who is simply after a quick and easy to understand history of Robert The Bruce I doubt you will find a better source.
| 
