Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: 1963 to 1969: 7 Magical Years of Music & Madness! Review: ... 1963 to 1969: 7 Magical Years of Music & Madness! ... That's what this book is: about the first seven years of the life of The Rolling Stones - and it's INTENSE! (Would you expect otherwise from a Scorpio?). ... This book begins with a chapter called FLASH FORWARD that talks about more recent events, as an overview of their whole carreer, in the life of The Rolling Stones. It ends with the story of the free concert the Stones gave in Hyde Park on July 5, 1969 in memory of Brian Jones, who had "died" just 3 days before! ... In between those two poles in time, Bill Wyman fills-in the cracks - from HIS point of view, which is very detailed. One comes away with the feeling that The Stones should have ditched Andrew Loog Oldham at the start, NEVER hired Allen Klein, kept Eric Easton as their main manager, and paid Bill Wyman an extra salary to look after their monetary affairs. He would have done a better job! ... Yeah, Brian Jones should have NEVER given-in to the pressure of Oldham, Jagger & Richards to boot Ian "Stu" Stewart out of the performing line-up of the band; but in the same light, ALL of them should never have allowed Oldham to hire Allen Klein. BIG MISTAKE! (How in their right minds could they then have even recommended him to John Lennon to manage The Beatles, too ... unless it was competitive sabotage tactics?). One comes away with the feeling from reading this book that - other than his blatant marriage infidelities - Bill Wyman is a very decent human being and a much more talented musician than most people realise. Also, he has a sincere affection, and respect, for Brian Jones, which shines through clearly. (On this, I totally agree with the reviewer from Montgomey, Alabama.) Page 307 alone will convince anyone who has any doubts about the matter that Brian Jones was being persecuted by both people in and out of the band (as well as by the law, and even by Anita Von Pallenberg). They knew his weaknesses, and they used it against him to their advantage. ... The one line in the book that hits home more than any other are Brian's words themselves, on page 289: "Ghosts of the morning can be seen on the skyline, if you watch intently enough..." - Brian Jones, Cork, Ireland, January, 1965. ... All in all, this book reads like a diary of one of the greatest acts of all time. I'm waiting for parts 2 and 3 to come out one day, so we will finally find out what really went on in the seventies and eighties as well! Because, if Bill Wyman kept notes until the very end of his watch in 1989 with the end of the Steel Wheels tour (I was there in Foxboro!), then those next two books covering those two decades should be just as interesting, if not as fascinating - for, after all, without Brian Jones, The Stones were never the same. ... Thank you, Bill Wyman, for an excellent expose from the inside on the working dynamics of the greatest Rock 'n' Roll band in the world! ... - The Aeolian Kid.
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: Detailed story of The Stones up to 1969 Review: Bill Wyman's "Stone Alone" is an excellent biography of The Rolling Stones, with the perspective of an insider but not the one at center stage. As the bass player and one of the founding members of The Stones, Bill Wyman was also the band's historian, keeping detailed journals about the band, and this contributes to making fleshed out anecdotes about the band from the early days until the death of Brian Jones and their free concert at Hyde Park in July 1969. As a bio-piece, there is the usual growing up poor in post-war Britain saga. Wyman engages readers with vivid images and a keen memory that bring this period to life, and he also builds brief pieces for the other founding members of the Stones, Brian Jones, Mick Jagger, Keith Richards and Charlie Watts. Having always been a casual fan of TRS, I learned a lot from this book. The major parts are fairly common knowledge in rock music lore, but here are some of the main points: *Brian Jones was the key influence in the early days, having a genius level aptitude for learning instruments, and possessing a charisma on par with Mick Jagger's. He was also a very screwed up guy with a number of physical ailments and emotional instability. *Ian Stewart was a key contributor, as a pianist, then road manager after his "relegation" by Andrew Oldham. *While Andrew Oldham profoundly influenced their growth, he also screwed them over, as did manager Allen Klein. What happened to all of that money? *Wyman was a shameless philanderer who detailed his many road conquests, but was also a doting father to his son, Stephen. Wyman also had a lot of bitterness toward Jagger and Richards, for their egos, their controlling of the band and ignoring contributions of other band members and reaping a greater share of songwriting royalties. Wyman details how his own projects were shunted to the side. The Jagger/Richards/Oldham "unholy trinity" also led to Brian Jones becoming a sideman, never blossoming as a songwriter, and eventual ouster from the band. Well, actually, Jones own self-destructive behavior contributed greatly to these three things. Wyman provides amazing details about each show, from the number of attendees, the gross receipts and what happened. It was also interesting to note his bank balance at various junctures, as the public believed these guys were millionaires when they were basically broke because of the mismanagement of their accounts by Klein.Some critiques: The book is pretty long, and the anecdotes of concert, riots and screaming girls in the early years get pretty repetitive. I would have liked to have learned more about the music itself and how the songs came together. This book is many about the performances and personal escapades of the band members. Still, the information presented provides a great glimpse into the Stones early lives and music from 1963-69. Having read this book, I'm eager to find the next "chapter" and delve further into The Stones music catalog from the blues/R&B period as well as songs beyond the obvious hits.
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: Detailed story of The Stones up to 1969 Review: Bill Wyman's "Stone Alone" is an excellent biography of The Rolling Stones, with the perspective of an insider but not the one at center stage. As the bass player and one of the founding members of The Stones, Bill Wyman was also the band's historian, keeping detailed journals about the band, and this contributes to making fleshed out anecdotes about the band from the early days until the death of Brian Jones and their free concert at Hyde Park in July 1969. As a bio-piece, there is the usual growing up poor in post-war Britain saga. Wyman engages readers with vivid images and a keen memory that bring this period to life, and he also builds brief pieces for the other founding members of the Stones, Brian Jones, Mick Jagger, Keith Richards and Charlie Watts. Having always been a casual fan of TRS, I learned a lot from this book. The major parts are fairly common knowledge in rock music lore, but here are some of the main points: *Brian Jones was the key influence in the early days, having a genius level aptitude for learning instruments, and possessing a charisma on par with Mick Jagger's. He was also a very screwed up guy with a number of physical ailments and emotional instability. *Ian Stewart was a key contributor, as a pianist, then road manager after his "relegation" by Andrew Oldham. *While Andrew Oldham profoundly influenced their growth, he also screwed them over, as did manager Allen Klein. What happened to all of that money? *Wyman was a shameless philanderer who detailed his many road conquests, but was also a doting father to his son, Stephen. Wyman also had a lot of bitterness toward Jagger and Richards, for their egos, their controlling of the band and ignoring contributions of other band members and reaping a greater share of songwriting royalties. Wyman details how his own projects were shunted to the side. The Jagger/Richards/Oldham "unholy trinity" also led to Brian Jones becoming a sideman, never blossoming as a songwriter, and eventual ouster from the band. Well, actually, Jones own self-destructive behavior contributed greatly to these three things. Wyman provides amazing details about each show, from the number of attendees, the gross receipts and what happened. It was also interesting to note his bank balance at various junctures, as the public believed these guys were millionaires when they were basically broke because of the mismanagement of their accounts by Klein. Some critiques: The book is pretty long, and the anecdotes of concert, riots and screaming girls in the early years get pretty repetitive. I would have liked to have learned more about the music itself and how the songs came together. This book is many about the performances and personal escapades of the band members. Still, the information presented provides a great glimpse into the Stones early lives and music from 1963-69. Having read this book, I'm eager to find the next "chapter" and delve further into The Stones music catalog from the blues/R&B period as well as songs beyond the obvious hits.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: A Journey Into a Wild and Exciting time Review: Bill Wyman's solid and detailed recollection of the birth and rise of the Rolling Stones paints a poignant yet triumphant picture of the how the Stones managed to captivate the youth of the day despite terrible predjudices based merely on their appearance as well as their image. This is a story of a bunch of hopefuls, misfits and straight men who together became the most lasting and formidable rock acts of all time. A group whose early entanglements with the establishment and whose vigorous stage persona paved the way for hundreds of acts that followed in their stead. Wyman's account is honest, humorous and entertaining. His insights on music are fascinating, his recollections of Brian Jones, the genius behind the band's original concept and the rising stars of Jagger/Richards make the story an epic one worthy of a full length film. Then there's enough information on other important personas in the Stones entourage who were never credited but deserved to share in the band's success. Also, there's the drugs, the scandals, the groupies, the wild riots and the thousands of mad fans accross the many venues where the Stones rocked on. All in all a great book for any lover of rock music.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: A Journey Into a Wild and Exciting time Review: Bill Wyman's solid and detailed recollection of the birth and rise of the Rolling Stones paints a poignant yet triumphant picture of the how the Stones managed to captivate the youth of the day despite terrible predjudices based merely on their appearance as well as their image. This is a story of a bunch of hopefuls, misfits and straight men who together became the most lasting and formidable rock acts of all time. A group whose early entanglements with the establishment and whose vigorous stage persona paved the way for hundreds of acts that followed in their stead. Wyman's account is honest, humorous and entertaining. His insights on music are fascinating, his recollections of Brian Jones, the genius behind the band's original concept and the rising stars of Jagger/Richards make the story an epic one worthy of a full length film. Then there's enough information on other important personas in the Stones entourage who were never credited but deserved to share in the band's success. Also, there's the drugs, the scandals, the groupies, the wild riots and the thousands of mad fans accross the many venues where the Stones rocked on. All in all a great book for any lover of rock music.
Rating: ![2 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-2-0.gif) Summary: Unconvinced Review: I must agree with some other reviewers of this book, and say that it is a very dry list of factual data, interspersed with Bill Wyman's moans and boasts. His gripe with Allan Klein about money seems to be quite valid, but he mentions it about a thousand times. Mick and Keith get quite a pasting- again it seems quite valid, but do we need to hear it so many times? Bill opines that Keith Richard's voice is weak and that his own songs were ignored by the band. Listen to his only self-penned Stones track of the 60s, on "Satanic Majesties", and you will conclude that this is quite a self delusion- his voice is far weaker, and his songwriting at that time was also inferior. The book seems to be more authoritative on dates, but we can only take Bill's accuracy on faith. My knowledge of the Stones is not enormous, but even I can see some big factual errors. For example he tells us that neither Taj Mahal nor Marianne Faithfull recorded songs for the "Rock n Roll Circus". A recent re-issue has proved him completely wrong. As another reviewer rightly said, Marianne Faithfull's autobiog is a much better read.
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: Excellent account of The Rolling Stones in the 60's Review: I read this book for the second time last summer. Bill Wyman gives a true insiders view to the lifestyles, beliefs, and antics of the Stones from before they were a band , up to the devastating scenes at Altamont. His memory and detail are uncanny. He describes many events in such detail that you really almost feel like you were part of the whole stones circle. He also credits the stones success to the vision and talent of Brian Jones. His relationships with the other band members are also talked about, however, he pays perticular attention to Brian Jones and the blues roots, that the stones lived by in the early years. He describes in detail the many events that the stones went through during the 60's . If you want to know what the Stones were all about. Read this book.
Rating: ![3 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-3-0.gif) Summary: Stones fans only Review: If you are a Stones fan, you must read this book! Obviously it is all true, since it is written by Rolling Stone Bill Wyman. He has painted a picture of what a Rolling Stone's life was like. Anyone who reads this book can see every detail in the Rolling Stones' history. It is definitely in my collection of rock history books, as should it be a part of any Stones fan's library!
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: This is the best book I've read about the Rolling Stones Review: If you are a Stones fan, you must read this book! Obviously it is all true, since it is written by Rolling Stone Bill Wyman. He has painted a picture of what a Rolling Stone's life was like. Anyone who reads this book can see every detail in the Rolling Stones' history. It is definitely in my collection of rock history books, as should it be a part of any Stones fan's library!
Rating: ![3 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-3-0.gif) Summary: Stones fans only Review: Not riveting reading, but has some interesting stuff. Sad how Mick and Keith dominated things, as when Bill would contribute a bit to a song, and Mick would say, "I wrote that!" And they would call Bill selfish, when, Who was really being selfish? But Bill Wyman is obsessed with 1) How much money was in his bank account at any time, and 2) How many women he slept with. For one thing, he had other things besides his bank account (car, house), so to try to convince the reader he was broke is a JOKE! And he, like all men who've slept with thousands of women, assumes everyone will be impressed with that fact, and not think the man might be sleazy, or have a psychological problem at the root of such promiscuity. Bill is so proud that he slept with a lot more women than Mick and Keith. Whoopee, Bill! If Jagger and Richards had been bedding as many women on tours, as you were, instead of writing songs in their hotel room, as they were, there would have been no Stones songs to record! And, even with all the more women you bedded than Mick and Keith, 99% of Stones fans would STILL rather be Mick or Keith, than you!
|