Rating: 
Summary: Very One Sided
Review: This is an average book. I was very disappointed that Strobel didn't interview any skeptics. It seems he just assumed that his own questions were the most difficult to answer. He does quote from a number of skeptics concerning the issues at hand, but he never looks for counter points or allows for the skeptic to answer the evidence. And when presented the evidence, Strobel seems to succomb far too quickly for me to believe that he was truly a skeptic when he conducted these interviews (I know he was already a believer, but the book is written from the perspective that a skeptic is challenging scholars). I realize some of these chapters could have been entire books if Strobel challenged every point, but I would have liked to have seen him really debate some of these issues. As a Christian, I did find some very interesting information in this book. But, even so, I cannot ignore the blantly one-sidedness of this book.
Rating: 
Summary: Recommended for All
Review: For the seeker, this book provides evidence as to how the Bible can be determined as historically true. The description of the crucifixion was a clincher for me. For anyone who wonders why this is important, there are plenty of opposing views in this book. The author started out an atheist wanting to prove his view was correct, not a Christian out to prove a point. Mr. Strobel also recommends that those who still have questions to research and find your own answers. I recommend this not only to seekers, but also to those already mature in the faith.
Rating:
Summary: For the doubting Thomas who needs to touch some history
Review: Unlike the reviewer who sees an element of Gnosticism in this book, I found it in line with the tradition that has from the beginning sought to show that Christ was an historical figure who actually was fully human. His style is catchy and he interviews scholars who have engaged the historical questions surrounding Christ in honest and thoughtful ways. It reads smoothly. There are some points that are a bit cheesy, but it is stylistic rather than content-based. I'll let you be the judge. Now, concerning gnosticism and "secret knowledge" this book does none of the sort. If historical research is somehow thought to be "secret knowledge", then certain readers will find this book offensive. Moreover, if you think that you need to check your brain in at the door to believe in Christ, then this book may challenge your assumptions about "faith". If, on the other hand, you are looking to be able to give an account of what you believe to an unbelieving generation, then this book is a good place to start. Again, the Church has always sought to prove that Christ was who he said he was. This is why the prophecies and typologies of the Hebrew Canon are so important. OUr faith is grounded in history. Having "faith" is salvific, but saying that doesn't cut the mustard to a skeptic. After all, faith's context is history and the acting of God in history. To try to seperate the two, to put faith outside of its historical context, is exaclty what gnosticism did and continues to do! This is exactly what Strobel is writing against! And in an age when the western world thinks Christianity is synonomous with the pentacostal emotionalism or the wealth gospel, a little history lesson can reorient the skeptic to the true faith. ...
...
Rating: 
Summary: Missing the point
Review: This book attempts to lay out a case for Christ being the Son of God using evidence. It should be apparent to everyone that this is impossible and that the divinity of Christ is a matter of faith. Mr. Strobel wastes time convincing the reader that Jesus actually died on the cross; Does anyone dispute this? Then he uses majestically circular logic to build his case. The most offensive part of the book, other than the poor prose, is his use of the bible as proof that events in the bible happened. It is just plain dumb. No mention of corroboration, and to top it off Mr.Strobel doesn't ever bother t talk with a rabbi, mulla, or even an informed priest but just with people who have allready reached the conclusion he wishes to promote.
Rating: 
Summary: A Refutation of Dr. Daniel Block's opinion
Review: For some who have grown up in a church atmosphere or who have an open, receptive heart, Dr. Block's point may be applicable. But for many who have grown up outside the atmosphere of Christianity or have witnessed many so-called "Christians" who claim a faith in which they do not live by, this is definitely worthwhile reading. I have seen many who have grown up in the shadows of academia who have benefitted from ANY "evidence that demands a verdict." Worth reading if you have doubts or unsure about making a decision. Anything that can give direction toward Christ is worth the effort if it reaches but one. I give a thumbs up for its value.
Rating:
Summary: Let's get honest...
Review: Lee Strobel's "A Case For Christ" is a myopic and dishonest attempt to sell conservative Christianity under the guise of objective journalism. Strobel bills himself as a "Yale-educated journalist" and "former athiest" as if this makes him uniquely qualified to be objective. This is typical of the dishonesty of his writing. I found myself asking why it is that Strobel resorts to such dishonest methods to prove his points. Shouldn't a compelled believer be certain enough in their beliefs to take on the mind of great skeptics, rather than the people he does interview, which are all clearly as evangelical as himself? Interviewing an evangelical who has fallen away from their faith is not the same thing as interviewing a skeptic. Is Strobel afraid of what he might find? This book reeks of an agenda: namely to convert as many people to funamentalist, conservative Christianity as possible. Wouldn't a devoted disciple of Christ be unconcerned with which form of religion a Christian practices? The facts about Jesus are that he lived and preached, and his teachings were written down 35-70 years after he died. The Gospels differ on some key details, and don't cover all the same teachings, and by their nature are fallible. There were close to 100 other Gospels written that were deemed inauthentic by early church leaders, although it has since been called into question whether they selected the right ones. No one will ever be able to claim the true message of Christ because of the way in which his life was recorded. People like Strobel are attempting to control the message of Christianity and create authority where none exists. This has been done throughout the centuries to disasterous effects, like the Inquisition and Crusades. Get over it, folks. Christ was an enigmatic figure, with teachings that were both profound and flawed. Why do you think there are so many churches? Too many have attempted to control his message and failed because it is by its nature contradictory.
Rating:
Summary: Great entry level book
Review: The Case For Christ presents some very logical arguments for Christ's existence and his divine nature. Although all of the data and knowlege possesed by the professors interesting, the omst compelling arguments were perhaps the simpleset, and htose are found in the last chapter of the book. The disciples dying for their beliefs and the conversion of the skeptics. The simple fact is that these two things happened. They simply cannot be refuted, and all scenarios other than the one presented in the gospels does not logicly explain the actions of the disciples or the conversions of Paul and James. That to me is extremly persuasive.
Rating:
Summary: A great book that is fun to read
Review: The Case For Christ is full of information and historical evidences pertaining to the Christian faith. It is very useful for Christians who would like to know more about the truth of what they believe, and at the same time, it is also fun to read. The book is about how Strobel (as an Athiest) traveled around the country in order to question some of the most acclaimed theologians in the country. He condjured up some great arguments which were then firmly adressed by some very intelligent and noteworthy experts on the issues that were brought up. It is an enjoyable book, and I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in Christianity (Yes, even those who don't believe in it).
Rating:
Summary: a case for christ
Review: a must for reading blessings to enlighten others on hard to answer questions thank god for getting your attention lee so to help so many a sister in christ
Rating:
Summary: Strobel's "Case" Provides Ample Apologetic Fodder
Review: As an adult Sunday School instructor, I found Lee Strobel's "Case For Christ" to be very useful in my Christian Apologetics class. The book was highly informative, well written, thought-provoking, witty, and at times controversial in its approach to the age-old questions concerning the authenticity of the Bible (in this "case" the four Gospels), and the Person of Jesus Christ.
Even though I am already a believer in the inerrancy of Scripture, this book enlightened me about many Bible-related issues as they concern the life and teachings of Christ and the disciples who followed him "from John's baptism, to Calvary, to the resurrection tomb." For example, Strobel's book effectively dealt with the issue of the seemingly impossible to reconcile constradictions in the four Gospel accounts by elaborating on the ancient rules of accuracy in storytelling. Also, I was particularly intrigued by the 8 tests which determine whether or not the "biographies" of Jesus stand up to scrutiny, among them being "The Intention Test," "The Ability Test," and "The Character Test." I highly recommend this book for those who desire to sharpen their apologetic sword.
|
