Rating: 
Summary: White House of Bush, White House of Saud
Review: I can't add much to the other reviews already given here, except to say that this is an excellent read and that I highly recommend this book.
Rating:
Summary: Everybody needs to read this, to know what is going on!
Review: I read this book with an open mind, which I think is especially necessary when it comes to this book, and the information that I learned startled and deeply saddend me, but it also left me feeling empowered, because it opened my eyes and I hope you will want to open yours too!
The book is based on facts, the author includes his sources and also, since I finished reading the book I have found numerous articles, in "The Chicago-Sun Times" supporting facts from the book. I also know that the movie "Farenheit 9/11", by Michael Moore, discusses some of the issues brought up in the book and even the 9/11 commission has reviewed issues brought up in the book, such as the evacuation of all Saudi Arabians after 9/11, with the permission of the White House, when all flights were supposedly grounded.
It is a VERY important thing to note that, the book's author backs up everything that is talked about in the book, so it is not a "Bush-bashing" book!!! The book is written to inform the American people about the, very real, secret relationship between the Bush family and the House of Saud, that basically run Saudi Arabia, and how this relationship has effected the American people and the U.S's relationships with other countries; fortunately this relationship is now slowly being exposed, through this book and the media.
It really does not matter whether you love or hate the book, what is important is that you read it and pass it on, because it is our responsability as Americans to stay as informed as we possible can, so that we can make the best decisions we can for ourselves, our loved ones and for our future generations.
You will take what you want from the book and leave the rest, but I promise you that you will never forget reading it and it will change the way you look at the world of politics and the people who run this country.
Rating:
Summary: best book so far this year
Review: where farhenheit 9/11 got a lot of stuff from. real easy read, easy to understand, PLENTY of info that will shock you.
Rating:
Summary: Best Non-Fiction Since "All the President's Men"
Review: What a remarkable job Craig Unger does of pulling together disparate threads into what becomes the easily identifiable quilt that is the Bush-Saud relationship. I cannot think of a more important work of non-fiction written over the past thirty years.In part because of the conservative criticism they drew, my last three reads were Plan of Attack (Woodward), Against All Enemies (Clarke), and The Price of Loyalty (Suskind). I'd heard of House of Bush, but it didn't seem to be drawing much ire from the right. Now I see why: It's footnoted and chapter-noted to the extreme; its facts beyond reproach. There are simply precious few (if any) chinks in Unger's armor for the right to attack. I've yet to see any serious criticisms of Unger's work. (You can bet the book's been picked apart, yet I've not seen anyone publicizing factual inaccuracies. There's simply no spin to use against Unger's masterful marshalling of the facts.) This book -- and Michael Moore's movie -- should be made available free of charge to Republicans and Independents in battleground states. You can't read the one or see the other without being profoundly bothered (though I'll concede that Moore can be a tad over-the-top). In years to come, this book should be required reading in history classes worldwide. My thanks to Craig Unger for setting the record straight.
Rating:
Summary: Excellent
Review: This is a great book documenting why George W. Bush is the worst
possible person that could be our president at this time. Also, check out the movie 911 in Plane Site. www.911inplanesite.com This movie shows suppressed news footage and video evidence from 9/11 that proves the government's "official story" is ludicrous. For example, the Pentagon was hit by something, but it wasn't a passenger airliner. That's why we haven't seen Pentagon footage. Please, check out this movie and show as many people as possible.
Rating: 
Summary: Foreign Policy Examination Ruined By Selective Prejudice!!!!
Review:
MOST HoS reviewers are imbalanced, vindictive liberals who're impersonating into reviews defamations of Bush with every frenetic conspiracy-theory their anti-government minds invent. Their reviews divulge the extreme of liberals' cancerously black detestation of Bush, that they're shamelessly willing to stoop to unconscientious fraud by insidiously masking themselves as literates who've read it, really abusing that façade as a screen to galvanize immaterial, conspiracy-theory, insane slurs!!!! If you're afflicted with schizophrenic Bush-animosity, DON'T get pollutedly mistaught by these SICKOS; Unger's book isn't blinded, anti-Bush fanaticism like the sordid crap vomited by shameless demagogues so much as a history lesson, albeit a biased one. The otherwise informative book, chronicling Arabs' obsession with Islamic fundamentalism that was tactically used by the Reagan Admin. to help defeat the U.S.S.R. in the Cold War, is ruined by Unger's prejudicial and stealthy selectivity in order-chronology and his sometimes worse misdeed on disadvantageously believing untrustworthy sources.
Unger's thesis is Bush intimacies with Saudis may've facilitated profane, Islamic fundamentalism's rise; something plausible. Unger begins by detailing the materialization of Binladen repatriation after 9/11, contending that, contrary to FBI's insistences, they weren't screened probingly as required, but received WH, FBI clearance. While true, Unger's first wrongdoing is committed. Unger plagiarizes this fact from other books' and articles' sources, an illness he perpetrates for most of his book's discussions, reducing his merit because he doesn't investigate independently. Unlike other liberal partisans posing as authors, Unger at least balances his planned accusations that the WH jeopardized national security by not scrutinizing Binladen's relatives with confessions that, in the Binladen repatriation, there's only speculation regarding their connections to Osama, and the Binladens renounced him.
Parts dealing with the Saudi-American connection's infancy are historically informative and edify that not only did Saudis begin their Americanization through Houston businessmen like Bath, but Demoncrats were also involved, like Carter's director of the OMB, Bert Lance. The Saudis' ultimate goal was blatantly to infiltrate access to American power's inner sanctum-the presidency. Saudis partook in particularly shrewd habits of having businessmen such as BCCI's Abedi and Mahfouz rescue American politicians' companies that were in financial direness, even Bush's Harken. Saudis would continue to ingratiate themselves in America's interests by covertly assisting two Reagan policies: arming the Contras and Iraq to counter Iran, excellently strategic maneuvers. Unger puts in perspective that Iraq's arming was actually CARTER policy; he encouraged Hussein to attack Iran to ultimately free the hostages. However, America realized that Iraq was gaining strength, so they'd backslide to once more financing Iran. For liberal scum who sanctimoniously, IGNORANTLY decry this, this isn't a duplicitous policy as much as it's savvy politics.
Ultimately, the Reagan Admin.'s dealing with Saudi Arabia developed into their defining tactic of Cold War victory: mujahedeen-financing in Afghanistan. Unger, by his intractable, liberal categorization, HAS to demeaningly "argue" that constitutes American creation of the jihadist monster, but upon examining evidence Unger cataclysmically presents himself-that Egyptian Qutb and militant scholar Azzam indoctrinated students at Jeddah's Aziz University with Wahabbi fundamentalism-there exists likelihood that LOTS of Arabs would've dilapidated independently into mujahedeen psychopaths. This policy was started by Carter Admin.'s Brzezinski to halt the Soviets' expansion.
America's handled two winning approaches to Islamic and Communist threats, ensuing to the Gulf War, whose chronicling Unger treats less than perfectly, injuring his legitimacy. Unforgivably adverse is Unger's selective reliance on untrustworthy, rabidly psychotic, anti-war sources for almost all of one chapter. Detailing the Gulf War, Unger exclusively abuses sources from the guiltiest anti-war forgers: the "Disinformation Company" and John MacArthur, slippery dissembler. Instead of recounting the intriguingly supposed offer Binladen made to fight Hussein with his "Afghan warriors" instead of the "infidel" Americans in response to Hussein's Kuwait invasion to reclaim Iraq's "stolen" oil, Unger descends into hazardously unstable, anti-war propaganda. Using MacArthur's source blindly, Unger subserviently regurgitates the sham Hussein DIDN'T amass a large army into Kuwait. This is THE worst objectionable aspect of Unger's otherwise decent effort, and citing another roguish "reporter" from St. Petersburg Times, Unger fabricates that alleged Soviet satellite photos of Kuwait and Iraq DIDN'T show buildup except America's own. Unger covers-up varying reasons the SAME experts he quoted offered as probabilities for said phenomena, including camouflage, wide troop dispersion, or glare. Another discomforting questionableness is Unger's preoccupation with disproving "Nayirah's" credibility, which CAN'T be "confirmed" other than on mentally ill, anti-war sites!!!!
Unger progresses to Clinton, his amoral partisanship lapsing conscience!!!! Unger lies through his teeth Clinton was first to "identify" Al-Qaeda as the premier hazard; if you believe this, you're a gullibly mistaught, liberal patsy-cretin. Unger's casualty is his exorbitant dependence on Clarke the Liar for information. Unger's so shameless, he humiliatingly discloses Clinton's maltreated faults of "anti-terrorism"-1993's WTC BOMBING, 1993's Somalia-Ranger-KILLINGS, 1996's 19-American-soldiers-killing Khobar Towers BOMBING, 1998's Tanzania, Kenya embassy BOMBINGS, 2000's Cole BOMBING-then still imposes Clinton "proactively" retaliated by-get this; gets funnier!!!!-bombing a misconceived "aspirin factory" in Khartoum!!!! When Unger stoops to subordinately swallowing all of Clarke's purport that he presented Bush a plan to assault Al-Qaeda, after being stupid or fanatically virtuous enough to provide the Admin.'s reasoning that Clarke's crippled "plan" OMITTED to account for comprehensive methods to target both the Taliban's AND Al-Qaeda's inseparability, the book careens into impurity.
Unger arduously stumbles to close with conspiracy theories about three Saudi princes "knowing" about 9/11 beforehand. If true, it'd ONLY put them in the same, helpless position as Bush who didn't possess information about time/place because Unger ruinously confesses they didn't know specifics either. Unger deserves only a half-rating since only the first two-thirds is responsibly uncovering history somewhat. Unluckily for Unger, the latter third's where Unger's afflicted by the irredeemable tumor liberals endure: hazardously degrading into skewed innuendo chicaned to his unsanitary worldview that Bush is evil. Unger's believability is again sacked with the 911 Commission's report that mortifyingly convicted Unger for forgery, namely his conjecture that the Binladen's got preferable treatment in flying. The Commission condemningly chided Unger's falsehood, verifying that no such imagined event took place.
Rating: 
Summary: Go ahead, say my review isn't helpful..
Review: But I guess I must state what I feel ragarding the matter. I have read this book thoroughly. I understand that Unger has gone through a great deal of research to have this book published and for that I believe he deserves to be merited.
However, being a Saudi myself, it's kind of insulting to read this book. Needless to say, I'll leave personal issues aside. Even though 7 of the 15 Saudi hijackers are still alive, and even though there has been NO evidence that these hijackers were on the plane (well.. except for when two of the world's tallest buildings collapsed, and the blackbox was destroyed beyond repair, the Saudi passports actually managed to survive miraculously, in addition to a low-quality airport security video that doesn't bear a date/time stamp on it and thus may not be legitimate for use in the courts), people still insist that it was the Saudis who did it. Towards the end it was stated that there is no evidence linking Al-Qaeda to the royal family.
Furthermore, the author has probably cited the wrong sources, or simply misunderstood them. That happens.
People need to wake up. Saudi Arabia will be invaded. It's been planned since.. Nixon's presidency?
If you are a vehemently racist, Saudi-hater sort of person, then this book is for you.
If you'd like to find out "the truth" about the Bush-Saudi relations.. well guess what? It's business. I am not denying the existence of a Bush-Saud collateral business relationship, just stating that certain individuals such as Michael Moore shouldn't be waving that around as an evidence to link my country to 9/11
One more thing.. it's more personal, but with no relationship to this book. Ever noticed how anti-Saudi books suddenly get 4.5-5 stars all the time? In addition to that, reviews that denounce such racist books always get "1 out of 242 found this book helpful"? Perhaps there are people who walk around amazon and give these reviews, but to be honest, I can't imagine that there exist people who have no lives, up to the point of doing such acts. I have no evidence to back me up, so I am ending my review here. Thanks for reading.
Rating:
Summary: Craig Unger's Powerful Truth
Review: I knew of the close relationship between the Bush and Saud families, but when I read this book, I saw to what extent the two families are intertwined. I find it absolutely horrifying when I realize that extends to favors to the bin Laden family. I am shocked and amazed that we re-elected this president and that the American people, for the most part, have shut their eyes and ears to the revelations in this book and in Richard Clark's Against All Enemies which I also read.
I recommend these books to anyone who really wants to know the whole unvarnished truth.
Rating: 
Summary: If this book is true
Review: If this book is true then as Michael Ledeen has written the United States is deliberately not targeting a major source of terror in the world Saudi Arabia. It is in contradiction with its own stated goal of bringing democracy to the Middle East as it is protecting the Saudi Sultans. If this book is true then the US is not as many see it the all - powerful superpower but rather a handicapped dependent nation feeding off its relation with a tyrannical corrupt Saudi regime. If this book is true then not only should every citizen of the United States be worried but mankind as a whole should be - because the war against terror is not going to be won. If this book is true
then the worse has barely begun.
Rating:
Summary: Republicans, please read.
Review: This book is so well written and so well researched, it's hard to imagine that anyone would read it and still trust our president. I realize that many Americans are cows, who want only to be told what to think and how to feel about the issues; and for them, Bush is the perfect president.
For those who want to be well educated on the political system and agendas the politicians themselves have, reading this book is the perfect start. Watching C-Span's morning show, it is appalling that many people are still under the assumption that Iraq was behing the 9/11 attacks. This underscores the ignorance of much of the public.
We have on our hands a president who applies rules to others that he has not been able to abide by himself.
As governor of Texas, Bush put in place one of the harshest criminal systems in America. He has also broken many law himself. Driving under the influence, insider trading, alleged cocaine use...where does it end? Yet no one seems to hold Bush accountable. Perhaps that is why , to this day, he will not admit any misgivings on his course of action in Iraq. Why should he? He's gotten away with murder. Literally.
Unger higlights the financial and political ties to the Saudi royalty to the very beginnings, when the elder Bush was given his first overseas business by the head of that family. Fast forward a decade or two when Saudis bailed W. out of yet another financial failure, purchasing his Harken stock. There was an investigation of insider trading, but the head of the commission was appointed by Bush's father. Martha Stewart, anyone?
I could go into more detail, but my predecessors have done a sufficient job.
Read this book. PLease.
|
