Rating: 
Summary: Interesting questions but only superficial answers
Review: Dr. Johnson starts the book by stating that the passage of time "provokes questions to answers" that we have taken for granted for a long time. He states in the Preface that "this book has been an attempt to be totally honest about my religious beliefs." While I must give Dr. Johnson credit for the issues that he attempts to address, i.e. Who are we?; Who was Jesus?, his answers in most cases are superficial at best. Several times in the book, Dr. Johnson states that he will not go in to an issue in detail because the length of the book does not allow him to do so. Thus, his search and answers seem to fall short several times. For example, refusing to address the Old Testament and what it may reveal about Jesus, means the reader and Dr. Johnson are only looking at half of the information available.
In addition, Dr. Johnson approaches the questions with a post modern view of the Bible and the world. By only focusing on a portion of Jesus' teaching, Dr. Johnson does not explore His full nature. This allows Dr. Johnson to give simple answers to diffcult questions. Such as the questions as to what happens to people who do not believe in Jesus? Simply his conclusion is that a loving God will find someway to address everyone. A nice post modern statement but not one supported by the Bible. Also, Dr. Johnson's conclusions about works being the way to knowing God is not supported by scripture.
The third section of the book about how his belief system has effected his life is the best part of the book. However, a better example of how to let faith effect your life is found in "The Purpose Driven Life" by Warren. Likewise the search to know God and faith are addressed better in "The Case for Christ" and a "The Case for Faith" both by Lee Strobel.
Rating: 
Summary: A Welcome Surprise
Review: I'm going to be honest: I got this book by mistake. I'm in the IVP book club and-as is inevitable-one denial form got lost under a stack of papers and this book showed up on my doorstep like an unwanted orphan. I was like, "Geez, I gotta pay almost twenty bucks for this?!" But as soon as I opened the book and looked at the table of contents, I knew the book was more than I thought.SECTION ONE: DOES GOD EXIST?
1. Why do the questions keep coming?
2. Is The Universe And Accident?
3. How Did We Get Here?
4. Who Are We? SECTION TWO: WHAT IS GOD LIKE?
5. Why Bother With Religion An The Bible?
6. What Did Jesus Teach?
7. Who Was Jesus? SECTION THREE: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
8. How Should Faith Shape Our Lives?
9. Is God In Control?
10. Can We Bet On The Heart Of God? As you can see, it is a standard two-stage apologetic (see _Five Views on Apologetics, which I also reviewed): theism then Christ. The former drawing on work in the Intelligent Design movement the latter drawing principally on the excellent work of N.T. Wright-not to different from what you might see in a William Lane Craig book, just pared down. My next surprise also came before I even started reading the book. From the back inside flap I learned that Johnson actually teaches at Harvard University. I mean, I knew he must have gone to med school at some point, but I thought he had left academia behind. To me, he was just some lightweight TV commentator. So it was with a slightly more open mind that I began to read the book. What I found was a very forthright (sometimes strainingly so) recounting of his own questioning process. [Note that all the section headings and chapter titles are interrogatives.] You can tell he's doing something he feels is important even though it's difficult. High-profile people catch a lot of flack for their faith (witness Mel Gibson) and though he hasn't exactly hidden it, this is the first time he's really spoken up about it and you can feel it. At one point he's like "Yes, I actually believe in the resurrection of Jesus" as if he's forcing himself not to beat around the bush. I respect that. I only have one serious worry about his view and than concerns the all-important issue of the divinity of Christ. It's the only place he's somewhat cagey. He endorses a very carefully worded answer to the question "Is Jesus God" that avoids commitment to the hypostatic union (though it certainly doesn't deny it, the quote is from N.T. Wright and appears on p. 145). My real beef is with his treatment of the Nicene Creed and the Catholic Church. He complains at several points of the Creeds "intellectualization" and even compares it to a "biology lesson." He refers to the Catholic Church as an "imperial church." Even if you are a Protestant, you ought to be concerned at he balking at the Creed. Even if he does not formally deny the hypostatic union, he misses Dorothy Sayers' point in _Creed or Chaos_ that "the dogma is the drama". He ought to read Gerard O'Collins' _Christology_ a simple, readable text which puts Christology in context. I hope that Johnson is not hiding heresey behind the term "intellectualism" and his anti-Catholicism, that would be a shame because this book is so surprisingly good otherwise. It's the only point where I feel like he was holding back. I'm pretty theologically scrupulous, so hopefully it's simply lack of scrupulosity on his part. I would love to discuss with him the way the Creeds emerged out of the Church Fathers' love for Jesus and the Truth, not out of "intellectualization of the Gospel," it's a common and sad misunderstanding that can be easily dispelled. Finally, the book is chock-a-block full of challenges to get out there and risk something on your faith, which I really appreciate. It should accompany any apologetic and I commend him for it.
Rating:
Summary: A Welcome Surprise
Review: I'm going to be honest: I got this book by mistake. I'm in the IVP book club and-as is inevitable-one denial form got lost under a stack of papers and this book showed up on my doorstep like an unwanted orphan. I was like, "Geez, I gotta pay almost twenty bucks for this?!" But as soon as I opened the book and looked at the table of contents, I knew the book was more than I thought. SECTION ONE: DOES GOD EXIST?
1.Why do the questions keep coming?
2.Is The Universe And Accident?
3.How Did We Get Here?
4.Who Are We? SECTION TWO: WHAT IS GOD LIKE?
5.Why Bother With Religion An The Bible?
6.What Did Jesus Teach?
7.Who Was Jesus? SECTION THREE: WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?
8.How Should Faith Shape Our Lives?
9.Is God In Control?
10.Can We Bet On The Heart Of God? As you can see, it is a standard two-stage apologetic (see _Five Views on Apologetics, which I also reviewed): theism then Christ. The former drawing on work in the Intelligent Design movement the latter drawing principally on the excellent work of N.T. Wright-not to different from what you might see in a William Lane Craig book, just pared down. My next surprise also came before I even started reading the book. From the back inside flap I learned that Johnson actually teaches at Harvard University. I mean, I knew he must have gone to med school at some point, but I thought he had left academia behind. To me, he was just some lightweight TV commentator. So it was with a slightly more open mind that I began to read the book. What I found was a very forthright (sometimes strainingly so) recounting of his own questioning process. [Note that all the section headings and chapter titles are interrogatives.] You can tell he's doing something he feels is important even though it's difficult. High-profile people catch a lot of flack for their faith (witness Mel Gibson) and though he hasn't exactly hidden it, this is the first time he's really spoken up about it and you can feel it. At one point he's like "Yes, I actually believe in the resurrection of Jesus" as if he's forcing himself not to beat around the bush. I respect that. I only have one serious worry about his view and than concerns the all-important issue of the divinity of Christ. It's the only place he's somewhat cagey. He endorses a very carefully worded answer to the question "Is Jesus God" that avoids commitment to the hypostatic union (though it certainly doesn't deny it, the quote is from N.T. Wright and appears on p. 145). My real beef is with his treatment of the Nicene Creed and the Catholic Church. He complains at several points of the Creeds "intellectualization" and even compares it to a "biology lesson." He refers to the Catholic Church as an "imperial church." Even if you are a Protestant, you ought to be concerned at he balking at the Creed. Even if he does not formally deny the hypostatic union, he misses Dorothy Sayers' point in _Creed or Chaos_ that "the dogma is the drama". He ought to read Gerard O'Collins' _Christology_ a simple, readable text which puts Christology in context. I hope that Johnson is not hiding heresey behind the term "intellectualism" and his anti-Catholicism, that would be a shame because this book is so surprisingly good otherwise. It's the only point where I feel like he was holding back. I'm pretty theologically scrupulous, so hopefully it's simply lack of scrupulosity on his part. I would love to discuss with him the way the Creeds emerged out of the Church Fathers' love for Jesus and the Truth, not out of "intellectualization of the Gospel," it's a common and sad misunderstanding that can be easily dispelled. Finally, the book is chock-a-block full of challenges to get out there and risk something on your faith, which I really appreciate. It should accompany any apologetic and I commend him for it.
Rating: 
Summary: Strongly recommended reading for the Christian community
Review: In Finding God In The Questions: A Personal Journey, Dr. Timothy Johnson (Medical Editor for ABC News) to addressing the existence of God and the relevance of Jesus Christ. Finding God In The Questions examines the evidence for belief and is also an intimate personal accounting of his faith in God. From his perspective of being a man of science and of faith, Dr. Johnson shares his own lifetime dealings with the tension between doubt and belief. Finding God In The Questions is strongly recommended reading for the Christian community, especially for those who are dealing with the stress of doubt and seeking the bliss of faith.
Rating: 
Summary: Sincere but uncompelling
Review: In this book the author, as he does on TV, comes across as very down to earth and sincere in his beliefs. He is even upfront about his bias that he really wants to believe in the existence of God. I believe this bias is most evident when he tells us that he believes the gospel accounts are a credible account of Jesus' life. I have spent the last eighteen months reading and pondering this issue and have come to the opposite conclusion. It is interesting how the author delicately tiptoes around the issues of whether or not Jesus actually performed miracles. In fact in an interview given on the net (Beliefnet) he says he is "agnostic" about Jesus' miracles. Now how can he say that if he believes the gospels to be reasonably accurate accounts of Jesus' life? I agree that the central message of the gospels is not about Jesus' ability to perform miracles, but if there is doubt about whether he even performed them then how can anyone not reasonably doubt many of the other things in the gospels?
The author likes to concentrate on many of Jesus' positive ethical teachings but somehow manages to omit Jesus' repeated threats of eternal hell in his teachings.
In the end the author ends up with a kind of "cafeteria theology". It's inoffensive but uncompelling.
Rating:
Summary: Pondering Questions About the Questions
Review: Johnson may have been prophetic when he wrote, "Some who admire my secular achievements will be turned off by this spiritual exploration and some who admire my spiritual stance will be disappointed in my conclusions." Though I'm sure there's a large niche audience in between, I'm equally sure that the audience on the far sides will be less than enamored. The evangelical readers on the right, use to a more classical presentation of Christianity in an InterVarsity book, will no doubt be surprised by some of Johnson's discussion of Christ's divinity and miracles as well as the nature of the Genesis creation account. The agnostic intellectuals on the left, will likely be intrigued but unlikely convinced. Though written with homespun humour and interesting illustrations, "Finding God in the Questions" is just too pithy for the title. Is this a book about questions and doubts, as the jacket cover and promotional materials indicate, or is it a book about answers? Doubt is not probed seriously enough and answers are not explored thoroughly enough. Several times I allowed my hopes to grow, anticipating a soul-stirring and mind-stretching discussion of honest doubt, only to find quick answers that seemed to value closer over exploration. As an introduction to issues relative to questions of God, Jesus, and personal ethics, "Finding God" is a valuable addition to the literature. As a deep and personal probe into the psyche that wrestles with the idea of a good and personal God in a seemingly evil and impersonal cosmos, "Finding God" left me with too many questions too easily answered. Crabb's "Finding God" examines similar terrain in a way that felt more personal. Curtis' "Sacred Romance" discusses reason and faith in ways that seemed more intellectually credible. Ross' "Creator and the Cosmos" presents scientific research on the uniqueness of planet Earth that appeared more plausable.
Rating:
Summary: Pondering Questions About the Questions
Review: Johnson may have been prophetic when he wrote, "Some who admire my secular achievements will be turned off by this spiritual exploration and some who admire my spiritual stance will be disappointed in my conclusions." Though I'm sure there's a large niche audience in between, I'm equally sure that the audience on the far sides will be less than enamored. The evangelical readers on the right, use to a more classical presentation of Christianity in an InterVarsity book, will no doubt be surprised by some of Johnson's discussion of Christ's divinity and miracles as well as the nature of the Genesis creation account. The agnostic intellectuals on the left, will likely be intrigued but unlikely convinced. Though written with homespun humour and interesting illustrations, "Finding God in the Questions" is just too pithy for the title. Is this a book about questions and doubts, as the jacket cover and promotional materials indicate, or is it a book about answers? Doubt is not probed seriously enough and answers are not explored thoroughly enough. Several times I allowed my hopes to grow, anticipating a soul-stirring and mind-stretching discussion of honest doubt, only to find quick answers that seemed to value closer over exploration. As an introduction to issues relative to questions of God, Jesus, and personal ethics, "Finding God" is a valuable addition to the literature. As a deep and personal probe into the psyche that wrestles with the idea of a good and personal God in a seemingly evil and impersonal cosmos, "Finding God" left me with too many questions too easily answered. Crabb's "Finding God" examines similar terrain in a way that felt more personal. Curtis' "Sacred Romance" discusses reason and faith in ways that seemed more intellectually credible. Ross' "Creator and the Cosmos" presents scientific research on the uniqueness of planet Earth that appeared more plausable.
Rating:
Summary: Heartfelt honesty from a very nice man
Review: Kudos to Dr Johnson for bravely sharing his faith and his doubts in this very inspiring book. Dr Johnson breaks his thoughts into three major sections. The first deals with the existance of God and issues involving science and creation, etc. Dr Johnson carefully weaves through a lot of discussion on both sides of the fence, so to speak, and does so with an honesty that comes off as genuine. The middle section deals with the character of God and related discussions about the Christian believed son of God, Jesus Christ. Here is where Dr Johnson really poured out his heart over the significant themes in the four gospels of the New Testament, and talked a lot about how his interpretations sometimes differ from organized religion. The final section goes into a discussion of how your belief system should shape your life. Here is where Dr Johnson deeply examines his own life, and almost expresses regret over not using his time, talents and wealth more perfectly (I felt like he should forgive himself a little in that regard).
Dr Johnson warns the reader early on that he feared the book would offend both the left wing (for being too pro-God and Jesus) and offend the right wing (for challenging some organized religious views). He may be right, but I found his views honest, refreshing and interesting to consider.
Rating:
Summary: Examining what it means to believe
Review: Timothy Johnson is a physician-he the staff ABC News doctor of the moment-and an ordained minister. In Finding God in the Questions he has, essentially, written two books in tandem-a deeply thorough and thoughtful theological inquiry and his personal history and faith journey. The two books-in-tandem format works very well as Johnson provides us with both intensely framed questions of faith as well as the clues and basis for understanding his own answers to those questions. What I especially like about this book is that it is in fact an inquiry, not a demagoguery in wolfs clothing as so many "spiritual examination" books are these days. I'm tired of the slew of books purporting to be examinations on faith that are in fact merely thinly disguised polemics that in fact dictate what one "has" to believe to be Christian. Johnson here is truly in examination mode, providing a challenging list of questions and presenting his own assessment of possible answers without ever becoming dictatorial in the process. Not all will agree with Dr. Johnson's conclusions. He is obviously deeply skeptical of much of what passes as "acceptable" Christian dogma in these intolerant times. In fact, his skepticism reaches the point where he concludes he cannot even really call himself a Christian given the prevailing ethos but rather refers to himself as a "follower of Jesus". Obviously, those that hold the utterly dogmatic and intolerant viewpoints that so sadden Dr. Johnson will reject his conclusions out of hand-tragic given that they are the ones most in need of a truly thoughtful self examination such as the one Dr. Johnson undertakes here. In the end one is left with a moving and though provoking book that inspires one to think seriously about many of the questions Dr. Johnson raises. That, obviously, was clearly his intent. That leaves us with a book that is a success from everyone's viewpoint. This is a truly great book.
Rating:
Summary: Examining what it means to believe
Review: Timothy Johnson is a physician-he the staff ABC News doctor of the moment-and an ordained minister. In Finding God in the Questions he has, essentially, written two books in tandem-a deeply thorough and thoughtful theological inquiry and his personal history and faith journey. The two books-in-tandem format works very well as Johnson provides us with both intensely framed questions of faith as well as the clues and basis for understanding his own answers to those questions. What I especially like about this book is that it is in fact an inquiry, not a demagoguery in wolfs clothing as so many "spiritual examination" books are these days. I'm tired of the slew of books purporting to be examinations on faith that are in fact merely thinly disguised polemics that in fact dictate what one "has" to believe to be Christian. Johnson here is truly in examination mode, providing a challenging list of questions and presenting his own assessment of possible answers without ever becoming dictatorial in the process. Not all will agree with Dr. Johnson's conclusions. He is obviously deeply skeptical of much of what passes as "acceptable" Christian dogma in these intolerant times. In fact, his skepticism reaches the point where he concludes he cannot even really call himself a Christian given the prevailing ethos but rather refers to himself as a "follower of Jesus". Obviously, those that hold the utterly dogmatic and intolerant viewpoints that so sadden Dr. Johnson will reject his conclusions out of hand-tragic given that they are the ones most in need of a truly thoughtful self examination such as the one Dr. Johnson undertakes here. In the end one is left with a moving and though provoking book that inspires one to think seriously about many of the questions Dr. Johnson raises. That, obviously, was clearly his intent. That leaves us with a book that is a success from everyone's viewpoint. This is a truly great book.
| 
