<< 1 >>
Rating: Summary: In the beginning, Thoreau and his brother took a trip . . . Review: It's a sinuous read, this book. Like the river it is modelled on, it curves nicely in some parts, elsewhere stretching into long expanses that can enthrall or bore. Read it as a journey. Read it as the development of a unique mind that is purely American. Read it as an elegy to a long-dead brother. Don't read it as "Walden: The Beginnings," for that only leads to disappointment. Take the trip. When Thoreau shakes his stick at you, shake back. When he looks too long at the world around him, speed him along. Remember that he is young and youth is impetuous; forgive him his mistakes; ignore the editing. Revel in the voice, and the implicit strength of mind married to depth of thought that will eventually find its rightful place in _Walden_.
Rating: Summary: In the beginning, Thoreau and his brother took a trip . . . Review: It's a sinuous read, this book. Like the river it is modelled on, it curves nicely in some parts, elsewhere stretching into long expanses that can enthrall or bore. Read it as a journey. Read it as the development of a unique mind that is purely American. Read it as an elegy to a long-dead brother. Don't read it as "Walden: The Beginnings," for that only leads to disappointment. Take the trip. When Thoreau shakes his stick at you, shake back. When he looks too long at the world around him, speed him along. Remember that he is young and youth is impetuous; forgive him his mistakes; ignore the editing. Revel in the voice, and the implicit strength of mind married to depth of thought that will eventually find its rightful place in _Walden_.
Rating: Summary: an invigorating book Review: Lately, I've come to really like the writings of Thoreau. It has taken me several years to return to this author...after being forced to read excerpts from Thoreau at a ridiculously fast pace during high school. Little time to read and less time for reflection left a bad impression of Thoreau in my mind that has, as I said, only recently been overcome.But now, upon my return, I have found "A Week on the Concord and Merrimack Rivers" by Henry David Thoreau to be a very invigorating book...one to be savored and not read too quickly. Taken at a good pace, it has been a joy. While transcendentalism still strikes me as a rather facile and egotistical philosophy, I have really come to see and appreciate the mystical quality in Thoreau's works. Like most mystical authors, Thoreau is not always engrossing--he is actually rather tedious in points, but his work is punctuated by passages of sheer brilliance. Seeing nature through Henry's eyes has been a wake up call to me personally. This book breathes excitement and lust for life upon the reader. Even his long winded discussions of different kinds of fish serve to alert me to my own lack of wonder. This world, even in its current subjection to futility , is still a wonderful creation. Nature (and Thoreau's picture of these rivers especially) echo the declaration of the Psalmist: "The heavens are telling of the glory of God; And their expanse is declaring the work of His hands" (Psalm 19:1). I highly recommend this wonderful book.
Rating: Summary: Two Rivers Run Through His Soul Review: This book, written in Thoreau's younger years, conveys the exact opposite impression that The Maine Woods, which I reviewed here, does. In The Maine Woods, Thoreau has lost almost all his mystical and poetic instinct. He is, if I may put it this way, a mere Naturalist (albeit a good one). This book, even more than Walden, conveys Thoreau's youthful exuberance and intimations of another world. The only thing I can compare its finest passages to is Proust. Particularly on music, "It teaches us again and and again to trust the remotest and finest as the divinest instinct, and makes a dream our only real eaxperience." Compare this to Proust's speculation that music consists of the inhabitants of a diviner world and points us to immortality. Thoreau, again, says, "These things imply, perchance, that we live on the verge of another and purer realm, from which these odors and sounds are wafted over to us."-Moreover, the book is fun and Thoreau is still full of impish mischief, as exemplified when a man asks him if he is a PROTESTANT, and Thoreau, after thinking over the true meaning of the word, assures him that he is!-This is a fun and, moreover, ethereal book which all Walden lovers must read.-I'm not sure what happened to Thoreau in his later years, when he wrote in his journal, "This is the vilest world I've ever lived in."-But never mind this later melancholy for now, take a romp down a couple rivers and enthuse yourselves with calls from another, "purer" world!
Rating: Summary: Two Rivers Run Through His Soul Review: This book, written in Thoreau's younger years, conveys the exact opposite impression that The Maine Woods, which I reviewed here, does. In The Maine Woods, Thoreau has lost almost all his mystical and poetic instinct. He is, if I may put it this way, a mere Naturalist (albeit a good one). This book, even more than Walden, conveys Thoreau's youthful exuberance and intimations of another world. The only thing I can compare its finest passages to is Proust. Particularly on music, "It teaches us again and and again to trust the remotest and finest as the divinest instinct, and makes a dream our only real eaxperience." Compare this to Proust's speculation that music consists of the inhabitants of a diviner world and points us to immortality. Thoreau, again, says, "These things imply, perchance, that we live on the verge of another and purer realm, from which these odors and sounds are wafted over to us."-Moreover, the book is fun and Thoreau is still full of impish mischief, as exemplified when a man asks him if he is a PROTESTANT, and Thoreau, after thinking over the true meaning of the word, assures him that he is!-This is a fun and, moreover, ethereal book which all Walden lovers must read.-I'm not sure what happened to Thoreau in his later years, when he wrote in his journal, "This is the vilest world I've ever lived in."-But never mind this later melancholy for now, take a romp down a couple rivers and enthuse yourselves with calls from another, "purer" world!
Rating: Summary: A pre-_Walden_ that's best read *after* Review: Thoreau sought the seclusion of the pond to write *this* book, not _Walden_. In 19th-century terms, this treatise is a modified travelogue based on a 13-day boat trip that Henry and his brother John took in 1839. By today's standards, contemporary editors and many an English teacher would decorate this manuscript with red ink and admonish the author that he strays too often and too far from the main subject. Bill Bryson's essays wander too, but he doesn't usually reach back and quote the Bhagavad-Gita, Homer, Chaucer, or Shakespeare. But whenever Henry takes in his surroundings, he is reminded of something else, and before you know it a serious discourse is off and running, and it has nothing to do with floating upstream or down. He expresses his opinions or offers his knowledge about fish, mythology, religion, poetry, reading, writing, history, government, traveling, waterfalls, friendship, love, life, nature, art, dreams, and science. He reminisces about a previous trip to the Berkshires and a sail down the Connecticut River. He breaks into poetry at whim -- sometimes his own words, more often someone else's. Along the way, the brothers paddle from Concord, Massachusetts, to the area around Concord, New Hampshire, and then turn around and go home. We meet some of the people they encounter along the way and get a glimpse of New England life during that time period. In some respects, the people and the land haven't changed much at all. We can see Thoreau's environmentalism when he talks about dams and their effects on the habits and habitats of fish -- concerns that are still with us today. We can laugh at his puns and enjoy his wordplay (i.e., "The shallowest still water is unfathomable" and Man needs "not only to be spiritualized, but *naturalized*, on the soil of earth.") Above all, we can explore these rivers and shorelines during a time period that we will never see personally, with the aid of a native naturalist who's in the habit of sharing his observations and thoughts. Read _Walden_ first. And if you find you enjoy Henry's take on nature and civilization and life and living, pick up _A Week_. There are a few gems lurking in here that you might connect with.
Rating: Summary: ...Thoreau's TRUE Testament... Review: [From Boating on the Catawba...in the "Musketaquid"] I will take the definite role of the Nay-Sayer in the long line of aficianados and idolators who insist that *Walden* is Henry David Thoreau's masterpiece... I will simply state that this work and "Life Without Principle" are his great contributions to literature, thought, and value... Take this quote from "Life Without Principle" (before I get to 'A Week...'): "To speak impartially, the best men that I know are not serene, a world in themselves. For the most part, they dwell in forms, and flatter and study effect only more finely than the rest. We select granite for the underpinning of our houses and barns; we build fences of stone; but we do not ourselves rest on an underpinning of granite. we do not teach one another the lessons of honesty and sincerity that the brutes do, or of steadiness and solidity that the rocks do. The fault is commonly mutual, however; for we do not habitually demand any more of each other." If that is not "preaching," but in the sense of a prophet, not a mere sermonizer, then there hasn't been any in a long time. But Father Mapple's sermon in 'Moby-Dick' is right up there with it. If I had only known of Thoreau [and I had not read much of him (and little then)except at the University] and had to believe that Thoreau was just what he seems to be in 'Walden,' then I would have given the man short shrift...because there is not enough of any sort of heart or soul in that work to believe that he is even human. But fortunately, a Thoreau worshipper (or rather, *Walden* worshipper) forced me, by his own imperious egotism, to try to understand this man Thoreau and his views. It is fortunate that I did, for I discovered 'A Week....' This Penguin Classics edition is excellent in a number of ways -- the two most important being the notes in the back which explain the allusions, and ancient Latin and Greek sources and excerpts(for those who might not know them) which Thoreau quotes and sometimes translates; and the incredible "Introduction" by the editor, H. Daniel Peck. He can say his wondrous words himself: "There is good reason for 'A Week's open acknowledgment of the attritions of time and loss. Conceived initially as a travel book, 'A Week' was immeasurably deepened into an elegiac account of experience by a tragic event that occurrred in Thoreau's life in the period following the 1839 voyage. In 1842, Thoreau's companion on that voyage, his brother John, died suddenly, and in agonizing pain, from lockjaw. Without question this was the greatest loss that Thoreau ever was to suffer. (He seems to have undergone, in the aftermath of his brother's death, a sympathetic case of the illness that caused John's death, and the few entries that appear in his journal in this period are desperately mournful.) Interestingly, though the pronoun 'we' characterizes the narrator often in the book, the brother's name is never mentioned -- an indication perhaps of Thoreau's enduring need to distance himself from this loss. there is nothing in 'A Week' that directly refers to the death of John Thoreau. Instead, his memory is evoked through various symbolic strategies. For example, the long digression on friendship in the chaper 'Wednesday' surely is intended to reflect the intimacy Thoreau shared with his brother. Even the ubiquitious 'we' of the narrator's voice speaks to this intimacy. So intertwined are the two brothers' identities in this pronoun that it is often difficult to tell whether a given action has been taken by Henry or John, or both at once." "To emphasize the elegiac aspects of 'A Week' is to remind ourselves that throughout Western history, rivers -- and voyages upon them -- have served as metaphors of transience and mortality. Yet, as I indicated earlier, 'A Week' is not solely a mournful book. Its rivers also support a spiritual buoyancy, and provide the setting for exploration and adventure. Most important, however, the book's larger structure enables it to 'transcend and redeem' the individual losses that it recounts." [wonderful writing here!] "In general, the outward-bound voyage of 'A Week' dramatizes the writer's encounter with time and its losses; on that voyage, he pays close attention to the shore -- which, in its discreet scenes of spoliation and historical change, symbolizes the passage of time. The homeward voyage, on the other hand, suggests assimilation, resolution, and renewal. If the primary mode of perception on the outward voyage had been observation (of the shore), then the primary mode of the return voyage is contemplation. Now we are involved in an inward exploration, and, symbolically, our vision leaves the shore and returns to the river and the flow of consciousness that it represents." -- H. Daniel Peck; "Introduction."
Rating: Summary: ...Thoreau's TRUE Testament... Review: [From Boating on the Catawba...in the "Musketaquid"] I will take the definite role of the Nay-Sayer in the long line of aficianados and idolators who insist that *Walden* is Henry David Thoreau's masterpiece... I will simply state that this work and "Life Without Principle" are his great contributions to literature, thought, and value... Take this quote from "Life Without Principle" (before I get to 'A Week...'): "To speak impartially, the best men that I know are not serene, a world in themselves. For the most part, they dwell in forms, and flatter and study effect only more finely than the rest. We select granite for the underpinning of our houses and barns; we build fences of stone; but we do not ourselves rest on an underpinning of granite. we do not teach one another the lessons of honesty and sincerity that the brutes do, or of steadiness and solidity that the rocks do. The fault is commonly mutual, however; for we do not habitually demand any more of each other." If that is not "preaching," but in the sense of a prophet, not a mere sermonizer, then there hasn't been any in a long time. But Father Mapple's sermon in 'Moby-Dick' is right up there with it. If I had only known of Thoreau [and I had not read much of him (and little then)except at the University] and had to believe that Thoreau was just what he seems to be in 'Walden,' then I would have given the man short shrift...because there is not enough of any sort of heart or soul in that work to believe that he is even human. But fortunately, a Thoreau worshipper (or rather, *Walden* worshipper) forced me, by his own imperious egotism, to try to understand this man Thoreau and his views. It is fortunate that I did, for I discovered 'A Week....' This Penguin Classics edition is excellent in a number of ways -- the two most important being the notes in the back which explain the allusions, and ancient Latin and Greek sources and excerpts(for those who might not know them) which Thoreau quotes and sometimes translates; and the incredible "Introduction" by the editor, H. Daniel Peck. He can say his wondrous words himself: "There is good reason for 'A Week's open acknowledgment of the attritions of time and loss. Conceived initially as a travel book, 'A Week' was immeasurably deepened into an elegiac account of experience by a tragic event that occurrred in Thoreau's life in the period following the 1839 voyage. In 1842, Thoreau's companion on that voyage, his brother John, died suddenly, and in agonizing pain, from lockjaw. Without question this was the greatest loss that Thoreau ever was to suffer. (He seems to have undergone, in the aftermath of his brother's death, a sympathetic case of the illness that caused John's death, and the few entries that appear in his journal in this period are desperately mournful.) Interestingly, though the pronoun 'we' characterizes the narrator often in the book, the brother's name is never mentioned -- an indication perhaps of Thoreau's enduring need to distance himself from this loss. there is nothing in 'A Week' that directly refers to the death of John Thoreau. Instead, his memory is evoked through various symbolic strategies. For example, the long digression on friendship in the chaper 'Wednesday' surely is intended to reflect the intimacy Thoreau shared with his brother. Even the ubiquitious 'we' of the narrator's voice speaks to this intimacy. So intertwined are the two brothers' identities in this pronoun that it is often difficult to tell whether a given action has been taken by Henry or John, or both at once." "To emphasize the elegiac aspects of 'A Week' is to remind ourselves that throughout Western history, rivers -- and voyages upon them -- have served as metaphors of transience and mortality. Yet, as I indicated earlier, 'A Week' is not solely a mournful book. Its rivers also support a spiritual buoyancy, and provide the setting for exploration and adventure. Most important, however, the book's larger structure enables it to 'transcend and redeem' the individual losses that it recounts." [wonderful writing here!] "In general, the outward-bound voyage of 'A Week' dramatizes the writer's encounter with time and its losses; on that voyage, he pays close attention to the shore -- which, in its discreet scenes of spoliation and historical change, symbolizes the passage of time. The homeward voyage, on the other hand, suggests assimilation, resolution, and renewal. If the primary mode of perception on the outward voyage had been observation (of the shore), then the primary mode of the return voyage is contemplation. Now we are involved in an inward exploration, and, symbolically, our vision leaves the shore and returns to the river and the flow of consciousness that it represents." -- H. Daniel Peck; "Introduction."
<< 1 >>
|