Rating: 
Summary: A Satisfying Novel for Patient Readers
Review: "The Virgin in the Garden" is a densely written novel that centers around a quirky English family during the time of Queen Elizabeth II's coronation. The book deals with themes found in Byatt's other novels: lives of intellectuals and artists, the occult and spiritual, suffocating atmosphere of an academic village, gender dynamics and familial relationships. Byatt's characters rattle off quotes and allusions in just about every scene, but she rescues them from being mere voices of ideas by exposing their human weakness and imperfection. The portrait of the core family, besieged with problems, is utterly convincing. But she does this slowly, and the first of this three-part novel, filled with considerable background information, plods with lethargy. The ponderous pace is compounded by Byatt's habit of depicting scenes in minute details. Her power of observation is admirable, but the minutiae ultimately obscure the dramatic thread. Something must also be said about the novel's point of view: the change of focus character from chapter to chapter works well, but when this change occurs within a chapter, and often within a same paragraph, the effect can be disorienting. Despite these flaws, riveting drama awaits those who are patient; the second half of the novel is deeply engrossing. The narrative pulse quickens, tension explodes, and in a few memorable scenes, fine dialogue alone propels the story forward with breathless inevitability--quite rare for Byatt, and quite entertaining for readers.
Rating:
Summary: rich in detail
Review: A thinking person's novel, dense and full of literary references. I didn't mind being left hanging at the end because the next two sequels have already been published.
Rating:
Summary: Dense and powerful
Review: I have read The Virgin in the Garden and Still Life, its sequal, twice. The first time I was predominantly aware of the lushness of Byatt's language, which is something I notice when I first read all of her books. For me it almost impedes my ability to understand and follow the plot. The second reading for me was much more satisfying. I really like the Potter family, with all of their eccentricity and irrascibility. The is the beginning of a very satisfying, sometimes very sad, series of books. They are worth the sometimes slow reading required.
Rating:
Summary: Dense and powerful
Review: I have read The Virgin in the Garden and Still Life, its sequal, twice. The first time I was predominantly aware of the lushness of Byatt's language, which is something I notice when I first read all of her books. For me it almost impedes my ability to understand and follow the plot. The second reading for me was much more satisfying. I really like the Potter family, with all of their eccentricity and irrascibility. The is the beginning of a very satisfying, sometimes very sad, series of books. They are worth the sometimes slow reading required.
Rating:
Summary: Makes you want to read the sequels
Review: I love A.S. Byatt's style- dense, literary, yet down-to-earth in may ways. The Potter family is portrayed carefully, with a look at the quirks and dynamics of a family. I like Frederica, despite realizing she is not very sympathetic. My only issue with the book is that there are some moments of indescribable bordom when reading about the Potter boy. He is troubled and sometimes the scenes of him trying to discover comfort in the world read as hilarious, but often as not they made me want to snooze. However, I still want to learn More about this family, so the author did almost everything else right!
Rating:
Summary: Makes you want to read the sequels
Review: I love A.S. Byatt's style- dense, literary, yet down-to-earth in may ways. The Potter family is portrayed carefully, with a look at the quirks and dynamics of a family. I like Frederica, despite realizing she is not very sympathetic. My only issue with the book is that there are some moments of indescribable bordom when reading about the Potter boy. He is troubled and sometimes the scenes of him trying to discover comfort in the world read as hilarious, but often as not they made me want to snooze. However, I still want to learn More about this family, so the author did almost everything else right!
Rating: 
Summary: The Virgin in the Garden: A S Byatt
Review: I read this immediately after 3 consecutive readings of Possession, and having since read all Byatt's other fiction, I regard it as my second favorite. The book conveys all the intoxication with literature that one associates with Byatt, with levels of academic reference that I still haven't completely fathomed after several readings. Yet despite the apparent dryness of its themes, it is also a very funny book. Much of it must be, to an American audience, very English. The early 50's in Britain described here were the age of post-war austerity, but were also heralded as the beginning of a "new Elizabethan age". Byatt beautifully re-creates the half-hopeful, half-cynical atmosphere of those times. She gives us her characteristic juxtaposition of things cerebral and things visceral, obsession with Spencer, Racine, Ovid and sex. Her heroine of this and two subsequent novels, Frederica Potter, is portrayed, I think, to be somewhat like Jane Austen's Emma - a character no one will like very much. But as a creature possessing all the human passions in abundance, she's wonderfully attractive. I just love her. She must appeal to anyone who has ever suffered for possessing an excess of intelligence. The book also provides further exposure to the geography of Byatt, with explorations of the parts of Northern England which she subsequently introduced into Possession. The places, the characters, the culture depicted all give more clues about the contents of the fascinating mind of the author. Like all her other books, it forcefully argues the point that everything that it is to be human, intrinsic to our species, is contained in the edifice of our culture, and that our culture is entirely built of language. Her work challenges the reader, in every line, to examine and re-examine the richly heaped-up layers of meaning in the simplest of English words, and to recall with awe how Ovid and Chaucer and Spencer and Shakespear and Austen are alive and well and living in our brains every time we frame a sentence. The enthusiasm with which she conveys this philosophy in this book is a pleasure every time I return to track down fascinating quotes or to re-read it.
Rating:
Summary: The Virgin in the Garden: A S Byatt
Review: I read this immediately after 3 consecutive readings of Possession, and having since read all Byatt's other fiction, I regard it as my second favorite. The book conveys all the intoxication with literature that one associates with Byatt, with levels of academic reference that I still haven't completely fathomed after several readings. Yet despite the apparent dryness of its themes, it is also a very funny book. Much of it must be, to an American audience, very English. The early 50's in Britain described here were the age of post-war austerity, but were also heralded as the beginning of a "new Elizabethan age". Byatt beautifully re-creates the half-hopeful, half-cynical atmosphere of those times. She gives us her characteristic juxtaposition of things cerebral and things visceral, obsession with Spencer, Racine, Ovid and sex. Her heroine of this and two subsequent novels, Frederica Potter, is portrayed, I think, to be somewhat like Jane Austen's Emma - a character no one will like very much. But as a creature possessing all the human passions in abundance, she's wonderfully attractive. I just love her. She must appeal to anyone who has ever suffered for possessing an excess of intelligence. The book also provides further exposure to the geography of Byatt, with explorations of the parts of Northern England which she subsequently introduced into Possession. The places, the characters, the culture depicted all give more clues about the contents of the fascinating mind of the author. Like all her other books, it forcefully argues the point that everything that it is to be human, intrinsic to our species, is contained in the edifice of our culture, and that our culture is entirely built of language. Her work challenges the reader, in every line, to examine and re-examine the richly heaped-up layers of meaning in the simplest of English words, and to recall with awe how Ovid and Chaucer and Spencer and Shakespear and Austen are alive and well and living in our brains every time we frame a sentence. The enthusiasm with which she conveys this philosophy in this book is a pleasure every time I return to track down fascinating quotes or to re-read it.
Rating: 
Summary: A letdown
Review: She obviously knows how to write. However, I didn't like or identify, or find interesting any of the characters. In addition she is very good at spouting out allusions, but most of them hindered the plot development instead of helping it.
After reading this I did not read the sequels.
Rating:
Summary: A letdown
Review: there's no music, as it were, in what a.s. byatt does: i have read three of her novels now and i'm, i think, in a pretty good position to judge her stuff as utterly pretentious and banal. read just one page of hers and compare it to a paragraph (a single sentence?!) of James Joyce. i am an english prof--hence all the lit allusions in this novel just kinda made me sick. she drops so many names/quotations you need an imaginary broom to sweep them away. dreadful dreck. you need something Englishy to read--investigate William Boyd or Julian Barnes. byatt is like a parody of good writing. only salman rushdie's fiction is more onanistic (though his criticism's pretty cool). byatt is the literary equivalent of Stevie Nicks! Icky!!!!
|
