Rating: 
Summary: I am WOMAN...
Review: I love this book. From the history of hysterectomy to the evolution of the breasts, this book covers at least a thousand things you (especially if you're a woman, too) really ought to know about biological womanhood. Even better than that, it's written by a (female) science writer who can really write, and while it does at times get difficult (well, it's a science book), having to reread a paragraph every once in a while won't kill you -- in fact, it'll help you understand yourself. Better still, this is an empowering book. Natalie Angier is no 1960s feminist theorist; she's a thoroughly modern lady scientifically pointing out why the female body/mind is different, similar, complicated beyond our wildest dreams, ultimately beautiful and eminently worthy of praise. Drawing on anthropology (my thing, so I loved that), biology, psychology, genetics, and a host of other fields, Ms. Angier introduces facts, fallacies, theories, hypotheses, and the data itself, and while she sometimes draws her own conclusions, a great deal is left for the reader to make up her (or his -- men can read this book too!) own mind. She includes a healthy dose of speculation, but -- and this is crucial -- she recognizes in the text that she is speculating, she points out the actual data, and again she leaves us to agree with her, modify her ideas, or not. Bottom line: WOMAN is a treat and a half.
Rating:
Summary: Mixing metaphor and mystique
Review: Angier uses her strong journalist's skills in biology to guide us on an encyclopaedic journey. The excursion examines nearly every aspect of women's bodies, with many mysteries unveiled and hidden facets exposed. She mixes clinical findings with emotional responses in a rich set of information, and no little opinion on meanings. There are countless insights here, and her talent with words makes the reading an easy task. It's a pity her introduction pays only condescending consideration to the value this book might have for male readers. There's treasure here for anyone who wishes to understand the poorly dealt with aspects of what it means to be a woman. While her exposition covers an extensive array of topics, perhaps the chapter on hormones is of greatest value. Spending much of her time dispensing with what she deems mythology, she underpins her opinions with a hefty dose of information on which hormones are important to a woman's well-being. It's a comprehensive view of the human body's operations reaching well beyond either pure biology or medicine. Still, the information applies to all human bodies, depending on the hormone, reaching well beyond her expressed, if confined, audience. We all need to better understand what is going on in our bodies. Angier threads personal experiences into the narrative with practiced ease. Her prose is witty and inventive, fertile with metaphor. She's present on almost every page, although there is nothing obtrusive in learning she suffers a thyroid condition, nor in standing with her in an operating theatre. Instead, her personal occurrences bring us closer to the humanity she imparts with these examples. They are situations many women experience, yet occuring without women being told of their cause and likely impact. She uses many of these examples in her attempts to dispel the mythology surrounding many women's physical conditions. Angier's eloquence may dazzle the unwary, but the careful reader will discern a wealth of inconsistencies. She's at pains to demonstrate her knowledge of the Darwinian paradigm. Unfortunately, her feminist rhetoric trips up her ambition for scientific detachment. Glorying in the massive nerve network of the clitoris compared to the penis, she exults: "Who would want a shotgun when you can have a semi-automatic?" This invidious contrast ignores that it was evolution that granted these gender differences. Neither sex has had a conscious choice in their physiognomy. She ranges over many scientific achievements in revealing the body's features, ignoring that men performed the significant amount of the research available to make this book. Learning the biology and considering our evolutionary roots is rewarding, but the aim of elevating women is undercut by disparaging men. The book, therefore, is only a qualified success. For a book based on scientific research, her failure to provide references is startling. She calls her bibliography "References" but it takes a serious student to pursue her sources. After building her credibility with a wide-ranging and vivid narrative, in the final chapters she nearly throws it all away. From her crusade to inform us about what's important to and about women, she suddenly elevates her soapbox with a vituperative assault on evolutionary psychology. This is a strange departure, since she's spent much of her text reassuring us of her Darwinian credentials. In this onslaught, she's suddenly given to misquotes, out of context citations and very selective research results. With so much complex information presented in the remainder of the book, she suddenly disturbingly simplifies here. Her celebration of the woman's body and psyche is badly marred by her insistence that as "a free and fiery primate" knowledgeable women will attain supremacy over the world's problems. Dismissing a wealth of work done in recent years on primate behaviour alone is not the way to increase the knowledge store.
Rating: 
Summary: Journalistic Examination of Woman-ness
Review: Even though I haven't actually read this book in a couple of years, I constantly refer to it and recommend it to any woman I know. Angier's holistic examination of all things female--from biology to mythology (and/or nasty rumors)--encourages both pride and amazement in the female body and psyche. If you're female, you definately *need* to read Angier's book, which should be required reading in high school.
Rating:
Summary: Woman, An Intimate Geography
Review: This is one of those books that I am considering buying for every woman I know: young, old, of all creeds, races, and religions.... even after completing it I am STILL floored by its appropriate, humorous, scientific, lyrical, and profound words. It is empowering without any negativism. There is not a shread of male-bashing in this work of art. Natalie Angier is a science writer for the New York Times and her work is infused with just enough science to make all the fascinating issues she covers comprehensible to any and everyone who reads this book. She covers the female body like no one ever has, and I don't just mean the chapters on breasts, the uterus, and the ovaries, but the hormones, the menstrual cycles, nursing babies, menopause, exercise, chemistry, and the psychology of being a woman. I wish so much that this amazing piece of work had been around when I was 18 and wondering what the hell was WRONG with me! (nothing. apparently. But who can tell an 18 year old anything.... maybe if I could have read it.....). Angiers carefully weaves together the myths, the legends, the cultures, and even the misogyny from where we ALL come and gracefully and humorously meshes them with the studies, the sciences, the theories and the facts, and gives the reader an entire body of work on all of the issues about ourselves we are curious about. It is book that teaches you something fascinating about how and why you are and work and play and love. One of the themes that surrepticiously repeats in this book is the completely normal, completely natural, "you are SO ok - it's laughable to think otherwise" theme. Women are complex and complicated creatures and we owe that to this magnificent temple called the body and we now have all the evidence and joy in this book to know that.
Rating:
Summary: Terrific Information, Richly Delivered
Review: Reading 'Woman: An Intimate Geography' is a bit like eating a decadently rich chocolate cake. Each chapter delivers information and insight that's nourishing, delicious, and -- almost -- more than I could consume in one sitting. This book offers a wealth of information delivered with gorgeous language, quirky insights, critical observations, telling stories and wry humor. It's a fascinating and provocative read. Natalie Angier's language is as vividly descriptive and as compelling as the wide-ranging content she conveys. 'Woman' is a terrific source of concepts to ponder and ideas to seed lively conversations. I was repeatedly fascinated by new-to-me 'factoids', and I particularly enjoyed the personal stories, from the author herself and other interesting women, that put faces on the facts and analysis. I recommend this book highly to anyone who loves a good read, who harbors curiosity about biology and life, and who likes to think. Enjoy!
Rating:
Summary: Outstanding science writing
Review: This book a wonderful combination of science, opinion, and well-honed wit - the wit and opinion being so much better for being so well based in fact. The writing is filled with first-person passion: not the grim, militant kind, but affection that can afford a good laugh at its subject. Best of all, Angier's affection for her topic (herself included) seems equally based on romanticism and research. Being in a species with two sexes is interesting, but news from the other side is rarely balanced, complete, or even comprehensible. I value Angier's eloquence and clarity. I also value her ability to incorporate new information into her views, instead of shouting down whatever doesn't match some political manifesto. The only fault I find in this book is that there is not more of it. The years since she wrote the book have added intriguing facts to the pile such as the genes in embryonic brains that express differently in male and female, long before hormonal effects take hold. Even when "Woman" was written, though, there was plenty of information about matrilineal mitochondria that she could have used - it would have enriched her discussion of genetics. Also, she omitted discussion of the relatively rare women who succeed in the hard sciences. Keeping with her tone, there would have been no need to compare them to the men in the field. They would have been interesting enough in their own right. I am not a woman myself, just an admirer, companion, co-worker, and occasional visitor. I was very happy to see a writer who not only has such agreeable views, but brings such a wealth of knowledge to the discussion and brings herself, too. Brava!
Rating:
Summary: A book both women AND men should read
Review: Angier ties together, in a highly readable manner, the complexities of the human body very, very well all the while never loosing site of the whole. I disagree with her on a few points. I don't think she sufficiently looked at human relationships as far as she could but, overall, this is minor.
Rating:
Summary: Awesome book
Review: Ms. Angier rocks. This book was great, I highly recommend it. It's heaven for those into science but also quite interesting for those who don't want something too technical or clinical. It's really just a lot of fun.
Rating: 
Summary: This is science writing?
Review: Although the premise of this book is promising and there are a few interesting little facts any real value is obscured by Angier's tired attempts at stylistic wit, complete failure to appropriately cite scientific findings, and blatantly opinionated feminist rhetoric. I was looking forward to learning more about the science behind the mystery of the female body. Needless to say, I was very disappointed.
Rating:
Summary: Anatomy with a twist!
Review: This is a really interesting book written by a woman for women. I learned all kinds of things! Although it does get a little slow towards the middle, it is a good read.
|
