Rating: 
Summary: You think we learn to talk at 1-year-old age? Think again!
Review: Deborah Tannen sure takes care of emphasizing her Ph.D degree in linguistics on the cover of every book she writes. And she has every reason to do that, since "That's Not What I Meant" is a book very influential and full of revelations about... talking.Through many (very many) examples of everyday talk, Tannen... oops, sorry, Dr. Tannen ;-) explains how something very small we said can turn a whole conversation upside down, bringing the opposite result of what we expected. Be it between friends, lovers, or even diplomatic ambassadors, she shows how the way we talk - anything from the tone we say a word to a single finger's gesture - can change completely the meaning of our talk, and gives advice and suggestions on how to talk better and have more successful communication with everyone around us. What I didn't particularly like about this book, is that Tannen is providing far more extensive examples of talk than she is providing explanations and solutions. She does explain things, and at the end, I did understand a lot of things I never really noticed about talking, but I certainly became a bit overwhelmed by the vast number of examples, and many times I couldn't focus on the main point. However, this still is a pleasant book, that is easily and casually read at any time of the day. Given its low price and the practicality of its conclusions, I'd recommend it to anyone.
Rating: 
Summary: Tannen's "Femme-Speak": A Very Hard Sell...
Review: Dr. Deborah Tannen's book, "That's Not What I Meant," is another execise in her customized brand of Feminism: highly gullibe, overly-simplistic,and ultimately unconvincing. Even her book title's are segways to her despondent and indifferent ideals of how men and women really speak. Dr. Tannen, a Georgetown University professor, has written yet another over-hyped social commentator book attempting to make sense of linguistics between men and women. Her tired attempts to provoke men into speaking like women. Continously, she propells the notion that men are liguistically-challenged because they don't follow her prescribed patterns of femme-speak. Ultimately, the book bottoms-out by the second chapter. everything else seems a sad reguritation of her previous books. If anything readers have learned about Deborah Tannen is her benign feminism and inability to understand men. Dr. Tannen should resort to her given occupation rather than marketing herself as an author. Given her title of Doctor, she is already spreading herself way too thin.
Rating:
Summary: Tannen's "Femme-Speak": A Very Hard Sell...
Review: Dr. Deborah Tannen's book, "That's Not What I Meant," is another execise in her customized brand of Feminism: highly gullibe, overly-simplistic,and ultimately unconvincing. Even her book title's are segways to her despondent and indifferent ideals of how men and women really speak. Dr. Tannen, a Georgetown University professor, has written yet another over-hyped social commentator book attempting to make sense of linguistics between men and women. Her tired attempts to provoke men into speaking like women. Continously, she propells the notion that men are liguistically-challenged because they don't follow her prescribed patterns of femme-speak. Ultimately, the book bottoms-out by the second chapter. everything else seems a sad reguritation of her previous books. If anything readers have learned about Deborah Tannen is her benign feminism and inability to understand men. Dr. Tannen should resort to her given occupation rather than marketing herself as an author. Given her title of Doctor, she is already spreading herself way too thin.
Rating: 
Summary: A classic book about communication says it all!
Review: Heard the taped version of THAT'S NOT WHAT I MEANT by Deborah Tannen . . . it'd an old book that's considered a classic because of what it has to say about communication . . . I think its subtitle says it all, "How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Your Relations with Others."
I had not thought too much about this point until I heard the many examples that Tannen uses . . . whether in a relationship or going for a job, what we say--and don't say--can make or break things for us.
One quote especially caught my attention:
It's no good at all telling people what you want if what you want is for them to know without you telling them."
Rating:
Summary: The perfect wedding gift
Review: More than one newlywed couple I've talked to describes the first year as a difficult and challenging time, and the insights that this book gives can make the difference between being able to work through the issues and just running in place. I read this book just after our honeymoon, and it was a revelation. Although both my wife and I had a wonderful relationship before we got married, we found ourselves having problems that neither of us understood after we wed. As I read this book I quickly saw that there were issues discussed that paralleled what we were going through. I loaned it to my wife, and now three years later we make it a point to add a copy to any wedding gift we give. Once you read this book, you may see the communication in your own relationships with a clearer eye. Of course, that assumes that you actually understand the text, instead of (as two reviewers here do) simply skim it for evidence of some preconceived political agenda. People who see Feminist conspiracies around every corner will completely miss the point of this book, which is too bad. I suspect such folks don't have much luck understanding the women in their lives either. A good example of the misreading that the Feminist-hunter did is in the claim that "she propells the notion that men are liguistically-challenged because they don't follow her prescribed patterns of femme-speak." Yet the whole point of Dr. Tannen's book is this: While indirect communication (more common among women) is as valid as more direct styles (more common among men), it is the way someone who speaks in one style perceives the messages from a person who uses another that causes problems. What really made the book enlightening to me was the exploration of how context and meta-messages change that cross-style dynamic, and it helped me understand how my words could be misunderstood, how I might be misunderstanding the words of others, and why the exact same actions after the wedding could have totally different results than they did a week earlier. My only negative comment about the book is that Dr. Tannen not only doesn't give any advice on bridging the gaps in style, she even states at one point that such efforts are futile. People who use an indirect style, for example, will be offended by a direct discussion of communication styles, because they'll try to figure out "what you're REALLY trying to say". In fact, once both my wife and I had read and discussed the book, we learned to clear up (if not always prevent) this kind of problem, and it made a huge difference in our marriage. A little less pessimism and a bit more guidance would have made the book even better.
Rating: 
Summary: Are We All Freaking About Misunderstanding Each Other?
Review: Tannen addressed problems in interpersonal communication, which is caused by metamessages, cultural difference, disparate conversational styles and choices, and misunderstood intentions (especially between men and women). With no doubt this is quality and eye-opening information to know and to keep in mind. Yet Tannen's account also provokes widespread fear that people will no longer communicate with one another at the risk of hurting or misunderstanding others. I believe that we should all keep in mind cultural, gender, and ever age differences in using metamessages and communicating through body languages and facial expressions. People might choose to speak indrectly to avoid confrontation or be polite. Yet I don't agree with the fact that "the more contact people have with each other, the more opportunities both have to do things in their own way and be misunderstood." In a way, Tannen is giving people (especially couples with problematic marriages), an excuse not to talk things out and express what's in mind and on their hearts. Conversations, if abiding all the rules and guidelines according to Tannen, will become manipulative. Everything becomes taboo in the household and people will only feel more isolated. People misunderstand others (in many occasions), because of unspoken bitterness, frustration, and shameful thoughts that don't want to be confronted. They let out frustrated emotions and blow out no small thing like "Where do you want to go dinner?" or some silly little argument that later on becomes fights. People will NOT be able to speak from the heart until they make a decision to be vulnerable and open. Think about why people feel frustrated - because they cannot be completely open about their lives. They are afraid to be confronted, challenged, and even asked how they are doing. Misunderstanding might play a little part, but you cannot solve relationship problem solely by casting the misunderstanding. Deal with deceit and fear in heart.
Rating:
Summary: Are We All Freaking About Misunderstanding Each Other?
Review: Tannen addressed problems in interpersonal communication, which is caused by metamessages, cultural difference, disparate conversational styles and choices, and misunderstood intentions (especially between men and women). With no doubt this is quality and eye-opening information to know and to keep in mind. Yet Tannen's account also provokes widespread fear that people will no longer communicate with one another at the risk of hurting or misunderstanding others. I believe that we should all keep in mind cultural, gender, and ever age differences in using metamessages and communicating through body languages and facial expressions. People might choose to speak indrectly to avoid confrontation or be polite. Yet I don't agree with the fact that "the more contact people have with each other, the more opportunities both have to do things in their own way and be misunderstood." In a way, Tannen is giving people (especially couples with problematic marriages), an excuse not to talk things out and express what's in mind and on their hearts. Conversations, if abiding all the rules and guidelines according to Tannen, will become manipulative. Everything becomes taboo in the household and people will only feel more isolated. People misunderstand others (in many occasions), because of unspoken bitterness, frustration, and shameful thoughts that don't want to be confronted. They let out frustrated emotions and blow out no small thing like "Where do you want to go dinner?" or some silly little argument that later on becomes fights. People will NOT be able to speak from the heart until they make a decision to be vulnerable and open. Think about why people feel frustrated - because they cannot be completely open about their lives. They are afraid to be confronted, challenged, and even asked how they are doing. Misunderstanding might play a little part, but you cannot solve relationship problem solely by casting the misunderstanding. Deal with deceit and fear in heart.
Rating:
Summary: Tannen proving her point my missing the point
Review: Tannen believes that men comunicate only in a report fassion. 'Only the facts, mame.' Women normally converse in a raport fassion, talking to build relationships. Tannen (a woman) doesn't understand that men build raport by talking the facts. How to overhaul an engine, sports stats, politics, etc. The condenced book form of this book would be a best seller and would go like this, "Men and women misunderstand each other all the time. It is worth the work and time to admit this and ask for clarification."
Rating:
Summary: That Guy Didnt even read it.
Review: The "Then why did you say it" man who gave the book one star utterly missed the point of the book. He should read it again, this time with the lights ON.
Rating: 
Summary: A blueberry muffin with all the blueberrys and no muffin
Review: The basic information in this book is invaluable, but the Author's style resembles that of high school student. The book is written in a classic outline style (I'm going to talk about this now), it's impersonal and has cold examples. Dr. Tannen doesn't seem to give much if any of her own realizations, instead she consistantly refers to other experts. I constantly felt as though I was reading a report written for a social psychology class.
| 
