Rating: Summary: spellbinding read Review: As a Chevalier fan this book was not a letdown. It was almost on par with Girl with a Pearl Earring. The characters were well developed. You grow to like and the good guys and hate such characters as LeBoeuf. The idea of the story in the tapestry and the people behind making it is fabulous. I wanted to delve further in the family of weavers. This is about change in our lives. Wonderful. A great piece of "historical" fiction.
Rating: Summary: This one's a winner Review: The basis for this book is a series of Medieval tapestries on display in a Paris museum. My first thought on hearing what this book was about was, "How is anyone going to make an interesting read out of that!" But Chevalier does, and quite brilliantly. As if that weren't enough, the writing is so excellent in this novel that you could read it just for the "poetry" and nothting else, but again, Chevalier does some remarkable things with "weaving" these elements togehter (the prose, the story, the characters) and the end result is great. The writing is on the same level as McCrae's BARK OF THE DOGWOOD or Chevalier's other work, GIRL WITH A PEARL EARRING. I highly recommend this stellar work of fiction to anyone with a pulse!
Rating: Summary: Captivating tale in spite of a "too romantic" writing Review: Tracy Chevalier was able to win my admiration once again for her ability to choose a subject, thoroughly research it and then weave a detailed human tale around the historical and anthropological facts. This careful background research makes this book (as her previous "Girl with Pearl Earring" and "Falling Angels") educating as well as entertaining. The book is a very easy read and the different narrating voices add to its appeal and to the reader's ability to feel for the characters. The book cover (in the copy I hold) is splendid, portraying a detail of "Portrait of a girl" attributed to Domenico Ghirlanaio and a detail of the "The Lady and the Unicorn" tapestry, both of which are so wonderful to look at, that for me it added yet another important layer to the reading. "Portrait of a girl" especially comes to mind in the beginning pages when we meet Claude Le Viste through Nicolas eyes. It should be noted however, that although Tracy Chevalier does present an interesting, captivating tale, it sometimes withdraws into a too romantic, soap opera kind of novel. This reader was willing to accept such writing as there is a solid substance behind it and the writer knows where she wants to take you. Nevertheless, I did not feel that the feministic messages were in place (re Christine Du Sablon and other female characters) and not always appropriate to the period's thinking. Same criticism can be said about the fact that the author feels the need to "resolve" the problems/issues of every character and even gives us an epilogue with details about the future of each figure. Although this is "nice to have" I did not feel it was really necessary and in a way lowered the perception of this book as a more serious work.
Rating: Summary: The going thing Review: It seems to be quite the thing nowadays to write a book set in a different time, mix in some historical facts for added interest, devise a plot, and come up with something that the publishers think is catchy. The Da Vinci Code, Pompeii, and a host of others come to mind. And if you really want some punch, add a great work of art--again, Da Vinci.But The Lady and the Unicorn is different and the most obvious thing that sets it apart from these "others" is the writing style. That and the fact that the tapestries are actually (pardon) "woven" into the story. With so many other books, these "add-ins" are just that--added in. In most cases they have virtually nothing to do with the actual plot and at best are distracting. Again, not the case with Chevalier's lastest book. In this intriguing novel, everything comes together as a whole. The characters are well-drawn, and the pacing of the book is handled with craftsmanship. I give one big "Kudos" to Chevalier for this little gem. Also recommended: Girl With the Pearl Earring, Bark of the Dogwood, Drop City
Rating: Summary: More than a historical novel Review: Like Chevalier's GIRL WITH A PEARL EARRING, which draws its story from a Vermeer painting, THE LADY AND THE UNICORN draws its story from another piece of art, this time a medieval tapestry. The story is set in 15th century Brussels and Paris, but to call it a merely a historical novel does it a disservice. It is much more a history lesson. The story is rich in characterization illustrating the contrasts of the social class system in place at that time. Artist Nicolas des Innocents is commissioned by a rich patron to design a set of six tapestries. The story moves between the noble household in Paris and the merchant-class household of a master-weaver in Brussels. Nicolas ends up changing every life with which he has contact including his own. Much of the story is immortalized in the tapestries.
Rating: Summary: A Wonderful Weave of Words... Review: Disregard any thoughts that a novel about creating a tapestry will be a painstaking, tedious read! The use of multiple-voice, first person narratives propel the plot in a frenzy of themes (eg, politics, sex, power and religion) that dispel the typical profile of a "historical novel." Each character's motive is critical to the ultimate creation, the tapestry now known as "The Lady and The Unicorn." The most intriguing question: Who is the hero of -The Lady and The Unicorn-? Or is every soul we meet a hero? Like a piece of magnificent tapestry, the author has fashioned literary threads that fascinate long after the last page has been read. Chevalier most ingeniously uses the backdrop of commissioning + creating a tapestry in 1490s Paris and Belgium to plunge the reader into a non-stop, page-turning novel. Beautifully written with curious period detail + charismatic character development to entrace her audience, this is a piece of art not to be missed.
Rating: Summary: The intertwining of colors, threads, characters and plot. Review: It's tough to follow a novel like "Girl With the Pearl Earring." I imagine it was Chevalier's hope to be able to weave as rich a tale with the art of tapestry making as she did with making a world-famous painting come vibrantly alive. The tapestry-based tale is only a mildly successful attempt at weaving families, politics, artisans and a class system. It's interesting to learn how tapestries were made, what went into them both thematically, materials and labor wise. However, there just wasn't enough story to produce the envisioned results...tapestries that both adorn the walls of the wealthy and that are also representative of and intertwined with myth, characters, skills and history. Instead we get artist on the make (non-stop); young maidens on various socio-economic levels who succumb to his charms; artisans operating on the whims and commissions of the monied and the mid-level managers who do the bidding of the wealthy. There were a few redeeming parts of the story however. One being Nicholas des Innocents somehow coming off his high horse and recognizing the natural beauty of some of the women around him. An "aha moment", one presumes, results in Nicholas'changing his original paintings so that the eventual tapestries reflecting his artwork would capture the more common women's beauty rather than that of the two higher born ladies who would have originally graced the tapestries. This much-anticipated novel was a disappointment. "Girl With the Pearl..." and "Fallen Angels" were far more successful. This seemed like a tepid attempt to return to a more successful, a tried and true, mode of telling a story. Interesting process (tapestry making); not so interesting tale.
Rating: Summary: Great women characters Review: Chevalier writes much better female characters than men. Still, this book is a great read. While I liked "Girl with a Pearl Earring" slightly better, this book comes in second place to that. The book has a somewhat unusual form in that each chapter is told by a different person. Highly recommended. Also recommended: "Bark of the Dogwood," "Water Music," and "I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings."
Rating: Summary: Trite Plot, Shallow Characters Review: I didn't like GIRL WITH A PEARL EARRING or FALLING ANGELS but I love the tapestries in the Musee National du Moyen Age de Cluny in Paris so I thought I would give Tracy Chevalier's latest book, THE LADY AND THE UNICORN a try. THE LADY AND THE UNICORN takes place in late 15th century Paris and revolves around the weaving of the six "Lady and the Unicorn" tapestries. In this series of tapestries, a beautiful maiden seduces an innocent unicorn with six senses: sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste and, finally, love (in this one, a woman is seen standing outside a tent on which are written the words: "A mon seul desir"). Since little is known about how these tapestries came into being, Chevalier was free to imagine her details. She was imaginative enough, but I wish she would have invested her book with a little, no a lot, more depth. Chevalier has created Jean le Viste, a parvenu nobleman, to commission the set of tapestries for the Grande Salle of his luxurious Parisian home. Jean wishes to see his coat of arms and a bloody battle scene at Nancy woven into the tapestries. His wife, Genevieve, however, has other ideas. She greatly prefers gentle unicorns and beautiful maidens. The artist commissioned to paint what will eventually become the woven tapestries, Nicholas des Innocents, loves ladies, well, almost as much as he loves art, so maidens and unicorns it is. Nicholas is a man who likes to indulge his sexual fantasies and there are several maidens in THE LADY AND THE UNICORN who only add fodder to his already fecund imagination. In fact, there are both daughters and wives. One of those daughters is Jean le Viste's own daughter, Claude. Another is Alienor, the blind daughter of the weaver in Brussels, Georges de la Chapelle. Then there is Genevieve, herself, as well as the weaver's wife, Christine. Nicholas isn't discriminating and he's a man who lets life invade his art and so it isn't difficult to imagine how these women come to be a part of the tapestries themselves. Before long, everyone wants to put his or her own little touch into the tapestries and weavers, dyers, trimmers, and more all add something to the design. Women don't have an easy time of things in Chevalier's novels. Genevieve is ignorned by Jean because she has failed to give him a male heir (as if the man contributed nothing to the mix), Claude is sent to a convent to preserve her virginity, Alienor is being pressured to marry a man she really doesn't care for and poor Christine, who wants to work on the tapestries, can only do so at night because the guild forbids women to practice the art and craft of weaving. Chevalier has woven a lot about the actual process of tapestry making into her story but I really wasn't interested in that...I just wanted to read an engrossing story. Had I wanted a book on tapestry making, I would have bought a book on tapestry making. Still, I think it should be pointed out that Chevalier has a great eye for historical detail. Although Nicholas des Innocents is an entirely fictional character, Chevalier does tell us that the style of the tapestries indicates that they were woven in Brussels and I certainly have no reason to doubt her...she was, after all, for many years, a reference book editor, so I trust her on the historical details. The bulk of the plot of THE LADY AND THE UNICORN involves Nicholas's amorous adventures and the struggle of the de la Chapelle family to meet the deadline for the completion of the tapestries (remember, poor Christine must work only in the dark). I thought this was a rather formulaic plot...sex, art, a Casanova-like artist, a cold-hearted nobleman and his greatly ignored wife. And, while I didn't like GIRL WITH A PEARL EARRING, I did think it was very evocative of Delft during the time of Vemeer. I can't say the same with THE LADY AND THE UNICORN regarding Paris and Brussels. Maybe it's because I'm very familiar with those cities and not with Delft, but Chevalier just never "took us there." (Granted, I was not in Paris and Brussels during the 15th century, but still, I got no sense of "Paris" or "Brussels" in this book.) In my opinion, there are very few novelists who are really good at handling a large cast of characters and Chevalier isn't one of them. The narrative in GIRL WITH A PEARL EARRING was boring, but it was graceful, but it was narrated by one character...the protagonist, Griet. In FALLING ANGELS, Chevalier used several point of view characters and the effect was choppy, at best. In THE LADY AND THE UNICORN, she has given us seven (I think) first person narratives and the effect, while better than in FALLING ANGELS, is still choppy and, well, clunky. Sometimes one character will relate something solely for the benefit of the reader...a bad way to give exposition. The dialogue is often awkward. A good example of this involves a statement made by Nicholas to Claude about the unicorn. One of Nicholas's spins for luring maidens into his bed is to tell them a story about the power of the unicorn's horn on sexual prowess. He says to Claude, almost upon first meeting her, "I want you to think of me as your unicorn." The man is worse than Casanova, but he hasn't an ounce of Casanova's finesse. Worst of all, Chevalier's French is often quite wrong. I was surprised at this. I thought surely, as a former reference book editor, she would have avoided this kind of mistake, which wouldn't have been that difficult to rectify. Maybe she didn't think any native French-speaking people would be reading the book or maybe she thinks we're so far behind the times that the French language hasn't evolved any since the 15th century...but it has. If the plot in THE LADY AND THE UNICORN lacks depth, the characters are even more shallow and stereotypical. Nicholas is an over-sexed fool, Jean is the stereotypical cold-hearted nobleman, Genevieve is the wife left to wither. Claude is the spoiled, indulged, silly teenage girl and Alienor, the blind daughter of the weaver is like all stereotypical blind girls...she's sweet and kind (but dumb) and she has some sort of supernatural power to "feel" colors. The novel might have been meant to be filled with passion and to shimmer with sexual tension, but I was bored by it. My own life is far more exciting. I didn't really care what happened to any of these people, not even Alienor, who was probably the best of the entire foolish lot. It seems to me that there is a fundamental flaw with all of Chevalier's books. I thought GIRL WITH A PEARL EARRING was gracefully written, but it lacked a central focus, a through line. It reminded me of a human being without a skeleton. FALLING ANGELS had promise, if only Chevalier had made Kitty the narrator; as it was, it was a structural mess. (I don't even want to mention THE VIRGIN BLUE.) THE LADY AND THE UNICORN is simply shallow and flat in both plot and characterization. Don't get me wrong. It's certainly not the worst book I've ever read and younger readers and readers who like bestsellers without a lot of literary quality will probably like this book. More demanding, sophisticated readers, however, will find THE LADY AND THE UNICORN shallow and trite. I think the best thing they will have to say about it was that it was a fairly quick read. Save this one for the beach or to while away the hours on a boring plane trip. And yes, I know, rather than complain, I'm going to give up on Tracy Chevalier. Obviously, she simply isn't my cup of tea.
Rating: Summary: disappointed Review: I loved Tracy Chevalier's Girl with a Pearl Earring, but this book is not as well-written or enjoyable. The main problem is that the central characters are not likable. Who can sympathize with either a randy, pompous artist or a silly, unthinking girl, or an art patron who can't even see his wife's face in paintings? In Pearl Earring, both Griet and Vermeer are appealing and likable, and we care what happens to them. Plus, in Pearl Earring, the sexual tension is palpable, and I as a reader wanted to know what happened between them. Here, the sex is in-your-face and I didn't care what happened to these characters. Chevalier can do better!
|