<< 1 >>
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: New insights into "Return of the King" Review: Any sweeping epic is going to have tons of concept art, and "The Lord of the Rings" is no exceptional. In the third collection of movie art, Gary Russell introduces us to the images and models that helped Middle-Earth come alive, and the excellent people behind them."Return of the King" introduces us to new civilizations, new monsters, and lots of new enemies and allies -- even more than "Two Towers" did. So the concept art ranges from armor and clothing (Faramir's regal armor, the Haradrim, Eowyn's masculine disguise, the archaic "Dead" armor), the perfect pirate ships, different kinds of Mumakil (prehistoric elephants), weaponry (different sketches of the Grond battering ram), and monsters like the hideous spider Shelob, whose sketches take up a full six pages. On a more sweeping scale, there are full-fledged paintings, mattes, models and special effects shots. Among the artists are the excellent Alan Lee and John Howe, who both paint and sketch their usual beautiful material. Jeremy Bennett also does a good job, although his stuff is substantially rougher. As for models? Try the ghoulish head of the dead king, different Fell Beast models, the Mumakil, and much more. It's nice to see the concept art in all its stages. For example, one Witch-King sketch from 1996 shows (Ben Wootten apologetically says) D&D-influenced armor. At the same time, an early sketch of Gandalf confronting one of the Black Riders is shown in nearly identical form in the finished movie. Okay, Pippin isn't there -- but the pose and setting are similar. The comments from the many artists also give a greater insight into how the various things in the film evolved. Some things (like battering ram Grond) were pretty thoroughly described in the original novel. With other things, like the Fell Beast, the concept artists had to be a little more creative. So it's intriguing to see how their designs shifted and changed, ranging from the grotesque to the silly to the final designs used in the movie. "The Art of Return of the King" is a good insight into the making of the epic film, and the concept art behind everything from spiders to siege towers. Well worth having.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: New insights into "Return of the King" Review: Any sweeping epic is going to have tons of concept art, and "The Lord of the Rings" is no exceptional. In the third collection of movie art, Gary Russell introduces us to the images and models that helped Middle-Earth come alive, and the excellent people behind them. "Return of the King" introduces us to new civilizations, new monsters, and lots of new enemies and allies -- even more than "Two Towers" did. So the concept art ranges from armor and clothing (Faramir's regal armor, the Haradrim, Eowyn's masculine disguise, the archaic "Dead" armor), the perfect pirate ships, different kinds of Mumakil (prehistoric elephants), weaponry (different sketches of the Grond battering ram), and monsters like the hideous spider Shelob, whose sketches take up a full six pages. On a more sweeping scale, there are full-fledged paintings, mattes, models and special effects shots. Among the artists are the excellent Alan Lee and John Howe, who both paint and sketch their usual beautiful material. Jeremy Bennett also does a good job, although his stuff is substantially rougher. As for models? Try the ghoulish head of the dead king, different Fell Beast models, the Mumakil, and much more. It's nice to see the concept art in all its stages. For example, one Witch-King sketch from 1996 shows (Ben Wootten apologetically says) D&D-influenced armor. At the same time, an early sketch of Gandalf confronting one of the Black Riders is shown in nearly identical form in the finished movie. Okay, Pippin isn't there -- but the pose and setting are similar. The comments from the many artists also give a greater insight into how the various things in the film evolved. Some things (like battering ram Grond) were pretty thoroughly described in the original novel. With other things, like the Fell Beast, the concept artists had to be a little more creative. So it's intriguing to see how their designs shifted and changed, ranging from the grotesque to the silly to the final designs used in the movie. "The Art of Return of the King" is a good insight into the making of the epic film, and the concept art behind everything from spiders to siege towers. Well worth having.
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: Okay But Could've Been Better Review: I always thought that an ideal Art of book should include powerful imageries that capture the movie's best scenes in initial stages. Yet this book leaves out many of those elements in favor of blurred panoramic art pieces that I found rather wasteful to the content of the book.Don't get me wrong, I like this book. Most of the artworks are astounding, it's just that I found many of the splash pages should've been devoted to more breathtaking images such as the Fell Beasts attacking Minas Tirith or Sam fighting off Shelob.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Get to See Mouth of Sauron! Review: I've been waiting since December to get this! They kept delaying the dates 'Dec. 2003' to 'Jan 2003' now at last it's February and it SHOULD be available to buy online AND in store. I must say, the wait is worth it. As one would expect, this is a great book which continues where 'Art of The Two Towers' left off. A really great conclusion to the 'Art of Lord of the Rings' books. I find these books great companions the Extended Edition DVDs.
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Adds Depth and Appreciation to LOTR: ROTK Review: Impressed by astounding cinematography of LOTR? I am. "The Art of The Return of the King (The Lord of the Rings)" by Gary Russell shows the amazing art behind the movie is more than pretty pictures. From "The Siege of Gondor" to "Shelob's Lair," Russell walks us through the stages of design that created a real and surreal world of Middle Earth. With Shelob, for different artist's reasons for the balance of spider- and crab-like characteristics. Part of the problem was in trying to stay as close to Tolkien's own version while bringing plausible life to Shelob that would work in a movie. Some of the pictures are pencils. Others are full-color, finely detailed views. Various angles are provided as in the many scenes of Mordor. There are photos of early models, both colored and plain, giving a 3D perspective of what the artists were thinking. The insight here will intrigue nonartists like myself who are amazed at how complex the making of LOTR was, and serve as a primer for character and building studies. There are elements of technical discussion, but I felt I learned about the relationships of style and message. I fully recommend "The Art of The Return of the King (The Lord of the Rings). It is a beautiful book, with interesting text. Having recently watched the movie, I appreciated both Tolkien and the makers of the movie so much more. Anthony Trendl
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Adds Depth and Appreciation to LOTR: ROTK Review: Impressed by astounding cinematography of LOTR? I am. "The Art of The Return of the King (The Lord of the Rings)" by Gary Russell shows the amazing art behind the movie is more than pretty pictures. From "The Siege of Gondor" to "Shelob's Lair," Russell walks us through the stages of design that created a real and surreal world of Middle Earth. With Shelob, for different artist's reasons for the balance of spider- and crab-like characteristics. Part of the problem was in trying to stay as close to Tolkien's own version while bringing plausible life to Shelob that would work in a movie. Some of the pictures are pencils. Others are full-color, finely detailed views. Various angles are provided as in the many scenes of Mordor. There are photos of early models, both colored and plain, giving a 3D perspective of what the artists were thinking. The insight here will intrigue nonartists like myself who are amazed at how complex the making of LOTR was, and serve as a primer for character and building studies. There are elements of technical discussion, but I felt I learned about the relationships of style and message. I fully recommend "The Art of The Return of the King (The Lord of the Rings). It is a beautiful book, with interesting text. Having recently watched the movie, I appreciated both Tolkien and the makers of the movie so much more. Anthony Trendl
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Movie companions don't get any better than this. Review: In my opinion this is by far the best of the three "The Art of..." books from Lord of the Rings. I can definitely see why this was released well after the Return of the Kings release. There are plenty of images in this book that have not been previously scene in any of the companion or other ROTK visual guides. I'm sure most of the material in this book will also be included in the ROTK Extended version, but why wait a year when you can see these stunning images now?
Rating: ![5 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-5-0.gif) Summary: Movie companions don't get any better than this. Review: In my opinion this is by far the best of the three "The Art of..." books from Lord of the Rings. I can definitely see why this was released well after the Return of the Kings release. There are plenty of images in this book that have not been previously scene in any of the companion or other ROTK visual guides. I'm sure most of the material in this book will also be included in the ROTK Extended version, but why wait a year when you can see these stunning images now?
Rating: ![4 stars](http://www.reviewfocus.com/images/stars-4-0.gif) Summary: A great Book Review: The last of the Lord of the Rings books was my personal favorite. It took all of the sub plots that had been going on throughout the book and made them all come together at the end. As in all cases the book is wat better then the movie, and if you are thinking about just watching the movie you are missing out on many events that happen. The book also paints its own picture in your head and takes you to a fantacy world where wizards and evil beast come to life. Humans are not the most powerful creatures and are actually regarded as weak. I would tell people of all ages to read this book, it is for all ages. I loved it!
<< 1 >>
|