Rating: 
Summary: All of Bruce's Willis's movies are Tip-Top
Review: Bruce Willis has it all. Ben Affleck is going to be a excellent young cocky movie actor, who could end up like Bruce Willis.
Rating:
Summary: the movie was really good it was one of ben's best,.
Review: hi my name is kara and this is what i thought about this movie it was really great,i recomend you see it more than once ,it had a good story to it. if you think ben is very cute or you like him you should see this movie .and it is kinda of like a comedy with all of the other actors,everone i know liked the movie.and ben has a great part in the movie it is one of his best!it is a very good movie i think you should see it!
Rating: 
Summary: Why why why....
Review: I really like Bruce Willis & Steve Buscemi & I was hoping to see a good movie...This one had a good beginning and all but suddenly everything changed. Steve Buscemi was terrible especially when he snapped on that huge rock. All the scenes on that big meteor were terrible. But the end was the worst and the most "american" end in the history of films. Perfect Hollywood ending. TWO stars because I like Willis and Liv Tyler was hot as always.
Rating:
Summary: INCREDIBLE Movie!!
Review: This is the best! It should of won best picture! This is actually a 2-Disc DVD set. It has over 5 hours of special features, including the director's cut of the film, deleted scenes, special effect analysis, interviews, theatrical trailers, a making of featurette, and audio commentary from the Director Michael Bay, producer Jerry Bruckheimer, stars Bruce Willis & Ben Affleck, cinematographer John Scwartzman, NASA consultant Dr. Joe Allen and asteroid consultant Ivan Bekey.
Rating: 
Summary: Worst movie ever
Review: This movie is predictable.So boring.The only good thing to remember is the song "I don't want to miss a thing".
Rating:
Summary: Movies like this give "Hollywood" a bad name
Review: God, I hated this movie. I've enjoyed many movies that snobs refer to as "mainstream" but this one truly reflects all of the worst elements of Hollywood--big, bloated plot and terrible, insulting dialogue. Stay away!
Rating:
Summary: One of the best films ever made.
Review: Me and my friends here in Denmark, think that this is a must see movie, it's got it all. Also my girlfriend think that this is a very cool movie. We all think that this movie has abit of everything, the coolest special effects, it has love, it has action, realy the best movie of this decade.
Rating:
Summary: prodducton not upto- date
Review: although the movie was good but I think it would not earntoo much of people attraction
Rating:
Summary: Bruce Willis saves the world!!! Hey, that's 5 words.
Review: Believe the hype. This film will make you laugh, cry, buy a telescope and start drilling for oil. Buscemi and Billy Bob are brilliant, the effects are crispy (talk about jagged edge - who designed the asteroid?) and Bear's singing is outstanding. If this film doesn't make you want to sign up to be an astronaut, then I guess you are one already. Moral of the tail, you don't need brains to have the right stuff and if the world is going to end, borrow loads of money and spend it on lap dancers.
Rating: 
Summary: "Deep Impact" meets "Independence Day"
Review: This movie, hastily released to the theaters after "Deep Impact", demonstrates the desperation of a movie studio and the essence of "I can do this too, and better!" attitude of modern movie copyism! Unfortunately, this movie FAILS to evoke the meaningful thinking and emotional impact of "Deep Impact".Next, there are a number of TECHNICAL ERRORS associated with the movie: 1) Liquid oxygen (LOX) IS NOT "rocket fuel" by itself - it's only an OXYGEN SOURCE for REGULAR FUEL like gasoline, kerosene, liquid hydrogen, etc. 2) Unlike water, LOX IS NON-CONDUCTIVE! therefore, if any were to leak on a live electrical circuit, NO "SPARKING" WOULD OCCUR! 3) At the speeds suggested by the movie for the "quick" moon trip, the shuttles WOULD NOT have enough fuel to maintain a constant thrust profile, much less have enough to circle the moon, "chase down" the asteroid, land, then take-off again (assuming they survived the landing). 4) An asteroid "only" 97 miles across would have NEAR-ZERO gravitational attraction. Even using a "thruster augmentation" suit as portrayed in the movie, "a wrong step" will still send the occupant flying into space. 5) The "Evel Knievel" armadillo sequence was LUDICROUS! there's no way it would've survived even a "minor" impact with the asteroid projections, much less "sailed away" over the chasm like it did. There are other glaring scientific errors in this movie. Unfortunately, the writers, directors, etc. preferred "flash and glitz" over any sense of accuracy or believability. Therefore, if all you want is a "special effects extravaganza" movie with a loud soundtrack, this is the movie for you.
|
