Home :: DVD :: Science Fiction & Fantasy  

Alien Invasion
Aliens
Animation
Classic Sci-Fi
Comedy
Cult Classics
Fantasy
Futuristic
General
Kids & Family
Monsters & Mutants
Robots & Androids
Sci-Fi Action
Series & Sequels
Space Adventure
Star Trek
Television
The Matrix Revolutions (Full Screen Edition)

The Matrix Revolutions (Full Screen Edition)

List Price: $19.96
Your Price: $15.97
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 .. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 .. 85 >>

Rating: 2 stars
Summary: Highly disappointing
Review: This review contains spoilers... However, if they prevent you from watching the film, consider that a good thing. You'd be better off if I just told you how it ended and saved you two hours of your life.

A horrible sense of disillusion dawned on me as I watched this third installment in the oversized Matrix trilogy. Suddenly I realized how trite and unoriginal the pseudo-philosophical concepts that guided the story were. These are the same concepts that the first two movies in the series followed, but this time it's much more obvious than ever before. The first film in the series, while not as original in conception as it seemed to me back then, had sparks of uniqueness and originality like few other movies - perhaps not in its concept but certainly in its writing, styling, and cinematography. The second one, while it didn't have that same spark, still managed to be satisfactory by incorporating several action scenes of immense originality and uniqueness in their styling and visualization. This third film doesn't even have that. I won't go against sequels and trilogies in general, because classics like Star Wars and The Godfather, not to mention more modern examples like Lord of the Rings and Kill Bill, could have never reached their full depth in only one film, but a filmmaker shouldn't have to do three films when he said all he had to say in the first one.

First, we have an impressive but rather pointless fight sequence in the Merovingian's bar. It might have been fitting for an opener if the rest of the film was more impressive. The mythological and theological hints in that scene are so obvious and overwhelming (the club is hell, the Merovingian is Hades, the Trainman is the Ferryman), yet they lead nowhere. Much more coherent were the creepy sadism-masochism not-so-subtle hints; but whether that was meant to have some meaning, or just to satisfy Larry Wachowski's odd passions, I don't know. The character of Seraph - 'The Wingless Angel' - seems to be building towards something, but reaches no conclusion. This is one of many openings the trilogy leaves that make me fear a spin-off, an animated series or perhaps awful second-rate books written by fanboys like the ones Star Trek got. The scene in the train station is probably the best part of the movie, and I liked the low-key, minimal production feel of it. It got dwarfed, however, next to the laughs I got from the scene in which Trinity and Morpheus meet the Oracle - Mary Alice. The Wachowskis were at a loss as to how deal with the death of actress Gloria Foster, and did less than well in the ridiculous solution they came up with. I think I would have liked it better if the Oracle became a thin, young, blonde woman; that would at least show some guts.

The battle for Zion was of course impressive, but to me it seemed like little more than a big screen computer game. The whole thing was badly unconvincing, especially those MACH style Starship Troopers rip-off robots the rebels use. And since the directors created in me absolutely zero emotional connection to either Zion or any of the people in it (were we supposed to become emotionally attached to Zion after that horrible orgy/rave scene in the second movie? If so, badly done) I simply didn't care about the outcome. An important part of good sci-fi writing is, since the viewer obviously has no empathy for the characters or places beforehand, to make him care about them. Matrix Revolutions didn't do that. Zee, Link, Lock and all of these half-baked characters introduced to us in the second film are uninteresting and unimportant. That entire battle was too long and very dull.

As for the other big showdown - the battle between Neo and Smith... Neo already battled with Smith in the first and second movie, and both of these scenes were original and impressive. The duel in the first movie was wonderfully directed and choreographed, while the battle between Neo and the multiple Smiths in The Matrix Reloaded was original and exciting. This final battle is none of the above; it's dull, predictable and unimpressive, using every cliché imaginable. It consists mainly of Smith knocking Neo down and Neo getting up again, over and over. And let's not even discuss Trinity's horrible, oversized, melodramatic and pathetic death scene which would have made Wagner blush.

Another thing I realized watching this movie is that the only character in the entire trilogy that I really cared for, that really had a personality and characterization, was Agent Smith. Hugo Weaving is, I now realize, a fantastic actor, and he created a truly timeless and unique character. I also loved his real-world incarnation as Bane; I could see it was Smith long before he gave himself away with that 'Mr. Anderson' remark. Could you possibly have recognized Neo or Trinity had they stumbled into another body? Smith is the only major creation which made the expansion of the series somewhat worthwhile. Morpheus was an interesting character in the first movie, but I could never forgive him after that horrible, hilarious speech he gave in Zion in the beginning of part 2. As for Neo, he was never very interesting since he became the One - I liked him better when he was a confused, clueless hacker. Despite any enjoyment I got from the second movie, the series would probably have been better off ending there.

Rating: 2 stars
Summary: Somebody Get Me the Blue Pill..........................
Review: I really need to forget I ever saw this movie. After the first two GREAT movies, I just knew this one was going to be awesome. They had such a great story working, and the groundwork they laid for this one in "Reloaded" had me salivating. But, then I saw this mess. The story in "Revolutions" didn't even seem related to the other two. Although it did have some nice special effects, the plot was poorly explained and the resolution of the story made no sense. It's like they opened up all these great angles in the first two but had no idea how to resolve them. This movie could and should have been ten times better. Wait for video.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: A real revolution!
Review: Couple of years ago I saw the first part of Matrix, and I enjoyed it. I considered it interesting, but not great. Moreover, I am not an action junkie, though I have to say, Revolutions was over my expectations. It impressed me a lot and in the end I realised the 2 hours passed so fast.

It is a good movie in terms of action and special effects. Also, it does not lack interesting ideas - one needs to have some brain in order to figure out some clues. So, if you are looking for ideas, believe me, they are there - you just have to look for them.

If you are looking for action, it is there. It is also a real revolution in what special effects and computer technology can do today. And I would give an Oscar for the special effects!
I also enjoyed the ending, whici is "open", in the sense that it could genetrate a lot of questions and answers. Or maybe a fourth Matrix.

I am a bit dissapointed about the negative reviews this movie got, as I don't think it is like the other action films Hollywood produced so far. It is smart, well done, with action and emotions.
I will not talk here about the plot, but I will suggest you to go and see it at the cinema with an open mind. I am sure you will enjoy it.

Rating: 1 stars
Summary: Bitterly disappointed
Review: Unbelievably bad. Atrocious. It's a long time since I've been this disappointed after seeing a fim on the big screen. Part of the problem is the build-up and the hype, coupled with the fact that Matrix 1 is utterly fantastic.

If you go to see this for the special effects, you will not be satifsfied. They are good, but there is nothing ground-breaking or jaw-droppingly good.

If you go to see it for a plot or good acting, then prepare to blub into your popcorn. The plot is weak, meandering and falls into the pit of repeating cliche. The fight scenes are way too long, and the most tedious I have ever seen - there is no suspense or climactic development to the plot. Acting is at best workaday, and at times the worst kind of hamming. Hugo Weaving's laugh towards the end comes straight out of the pantomine top-drawer.

If you go to see it for a conclusion to the series - don't bother. Some of the reviews seem to suggest that it leaves you thinking - the only thinking I was doing as I came out of the cinema was 'why have I wasted £8 and 2.5 hours of my life on this...' There are more holes in the plot than in swiss cheese - but the point is you can't be bothered with working out why - you are not drawn into the characters or situations.

I could go on, but I can't be bothered to expend any more effort on this - precisely the attitude that the filmmakers seem to have adopted.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: still good!
Review: most people probably would agree it isn't the best of the 3

the ending wasn't as great as i wanted; there were too many illogical elements in it. but still, it is a good movie.
why? because this movie is all fighting! excellent special effects

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: The Matrix Revolutions
Review: I've heard some people talk about this movie negatively. Personally, I believe that this was a great way to wrap up the mind-blowing Matrix series. Yes, many did expect it to be mediocore. Luckily, I decided that these people shouldn't decide my opinion for me, and I saw the movie as soon as I could. It is a MUST SEE. The effects are revolutionary, the acting is incredible, and the story is captivating. I would reccomend this movie to any serious movie-goer who likes a good picture that makes you think. I did feel the ending was sufficent, and definately made the audience think. Anyone who bashes the way this incredible movie ended obviously doesn't like to see anything thought-provoking.

Rating: 3 stars
Summary: Confusing Eye-Candy
Review: First of all, I am a huge fan of "The Matrix". Having said that, this last film is a huge cop-out. I think the Wachowski bros. owe their audience at least a plot they can follow.
The biggest irritation for me was having an idiot Neo that couldn't recognise Agent Smith in another body. Smith was the only guy in the whole show (with the exception of the boss in the first film) who called Neo "Mr. Anderson." So for Neo not to put two and two together was crazy. It was like Luke figuring out that Lea (the only female in the story) was his sister. Duh! The other point of irritation was the ending where everything was digitally restored to happyland status. Wasn't the point of getting out of the matrix the fact that it was a false reality? And after all of the fighting and the mystic sayings, all that was achieved was a "stand-off" where everybody who's left lives in a sunnier matrix.
It is a little like fighting World War 3 for a 10 cent per hour raise and better parking at a dead-end job you hate.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: WOW!
Review: Ok, all of you out there who thought that this movie was going to be dumb and not as good as the other two, wrong! I think this is the best. With the lead up and everyting to it, its fantastic! The Matrix launched you into it, and I had really no idea what was going on. The Matrix Reloaded was ok, but there was more psycho-babble going on than the first, plus that scene between Neo and Trinity was just too much bare skin for my taste. But The Matrix Revolutions was the best of all. Did you notice though, it has an uncanny resemblence to the book series, Dune by Frank Herbert? Heres the similarities: Neo is the one outcasts have been waiting for, he goes by a different name than the one he was born with in the Matrix itself, his great love dies, he becomes the blind messiah, there is a great war against machines, and, most significantly, he walks the Golden Path! I mean come on, as great a movie as it was, it could have been a little more original. Still, great movie, a must see for everyone!

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: The continuation of an epic sci-fi saga
Review: "The Matrix Revolutions" continues the story begun in the original "Matrix" film. Once again Keanu Reeves plays cybermessiah Neo, who fights to defend humanity against an enslaving machine collective.

"Revolutions" effectively expands upon the compelling mythology established in the original film, as the freedom fighters continue to move between the gritty real world and a complex virtual reality construct. Much of the film is a relentless orgy of violence and explosions--at times it's just too much and becomes exhausting. Nevertheless, there are a number of genuinely thrilling and inventive action/fight scenes. There are also some memorable visual images.

At its worst "Revolutions" can be bombastic, obscure, pretentious, and even corny. The film is at its best when it remains in touch with the essential humanity of its characters. Reeves anchors the eclectic, multiethnic ensemble cast with his earnest, understated performance.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: "THE ONE" movie to see!
Review: I thought that the reviews that I have read so far have been unfair and have totally insulted the hard work that the creators of the matrix trilogy put into making these movies.
Matrix Revolutions was a great conclusion to the Matrix trilogy. I takes some brain power to figure out these movies, but after watching them you get what they are trying to tell you through these movies.
This trilogy has been a MOVIES TO SEE. I have been to revolutions twice and I still marvel at it.
This is a movie that you shouldn't miss.


<< 1 .. 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 .. 85 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates