Rating: 
Summary: Wow, What a Ride!
Review: I saw TTT on opening day, knowing ahead of time that there were changes from the book, and I loved it. I admit I was annoyed by the changes made to Faramir's character (unnecessary), Frodo confronting the Ringwraith (why?), Theoden's possession (didn't like that at all), and Haldir's fate. Changes I didn't mind (and actually kind of liked) were Elves at Helm's Deep and Arwen. In spite of the changes, I thought this movie was great. Legolas is amazing (love the shield surfing and the unbelievable horse mounting--there were audible gasps of amazement from the audience) and well-acted by Orlando Bloom. The Elf is bad and oh so nice to look at. (And, no, I'm not a teenage girl. I'll soon be 30. *S*) Sean Astin is perfect as Sam. I don't think anyone could do it better than him. Another reviewer said it and I agree that Sam is one of the true heroes of the trilogy. Gollum looks great. He's quite life-like and worthy of some sort of Oscar. I loved the comic relief of Gimli--necessary and well-acted. Grima Wormtongue is wonderfully sinister and creepy. Every performance was well done--Gandalf, Theoden, Eowyn, Arwen, Saruman, Frodo, Merry, Pippin, Eomer, Aragorn, and the Ents (loved the attack on Isengard). The battle scenes are great, the scenery is beautiful, the CGI is top-notch (not overdone), the story is interesting, the acting believable. It's not boring at all (I was practically on the edge of my seat, figuratively speaking, the whole time) or unoriginal (it all came from the imagination of Tolkien long before any of the movies a reviewer mentioned were ever made) as some have claimed. Though I've read (and loved) the books and didn't like some of the changes in the movie, The Two Towers is one of the best movies that's ever been made. I loved it, can't wait to see it again and can't wait to own it on DVD. :)
Rating: 
Summary: Stunning!!
Review: I have now sat through "Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Rings" several times, including a few viewings of the film's extended edition, which was released on DVD earlier this Winter. When I originally saw the film theatrically, I liked it, but didn't love it and found it rather flawed - the first hour seemed too slow and I never really found myself fully involved in the characters. However, I warmed up to the film after its first DVD release and consider the extended version to be a very considerable improvement over the theatrical cut. I'm pleased to say that I found "The Two Towers", the follow-up to the first picture, to be mostly a phenomenal piece of cinema (once again, I have not read the books - I'm going simply on what I thought of the film). The film may be the middle part of the trilogy, but that actually works for the opening of the picture - we know these characters and after the sudden close of the first film, most will likely be eager to see the adventure continue on-screen. The opening sixty minutes of the picture opens at a full-throttle pace as Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), Legolas the elf (Orlando Bloom), and Gimli the dwarf (John Rhys-Davies) continue to try and rescue hobbits Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd) from their Orc captors. Elsewhere, Frodo (Elijah Wood) and Sam (Sean Astin) continue their journey to destroy the ring, guided by Gollum (Andy Serkis), a CGI-creature who is obsessed with the ring, but decides to serve as the guide for the two hobbits. There is also the return of Gandalf (Ian McKellen). The film does split the story into a few pieces, although it's a credit to director Peter Jackson and the film's editors that the film cuts between the stories perfectly, with not too much time spent on one or another. This film focuses on Aragorn's character considerably more than anyone else, but that's not a bad thing: Viggo Mortensen is a terrific actor and the progression of this character is the most engaging part of this picture. Still, Frodo's quest is compelling material and even Merry and Pippin's ending up on the shoulders of a giant tree creature, Tree Beard (voiced by John Rhys-Davies) is enjoyable - a good mix of comedy and drama. While Gollum's tragic battle with his own soul is often very well-played, there is one darkly funny sequence with the creature battling himself that is quite amusing. The human actors also all provide uniformly stellar performances, with even some of the performances that have less screen-time (Liv Tyler's Arwen) remaining memorable. All of this eventually builds towards the battle of Helm's Deep, a giant stone fortress that Aragorn, Pippin, Gimli, king Theoden (Bernard Hill) and an army of a few hundred men have retreated to. Sauruman (Christopher Lee)'s armies are sweeping across the lands, however, and its only a matter of time before they reach the gates. When they do - the film's last 20-25 minutes - it's something truly breathtaking. Facing impossible odds, the band of a few hundred looks out to face nearly 10,000. The film does have a bit of a slow point around the middle, but both the opening and closing of the film proceed with more forward momentum than the first picture did in general. "The Two Towers" story, split into several sections, also feels larger than the first film - there's more going on, there feels like even more at stake and the urgency and emotion that Jackson is able to give many events in the film is remarkable. Technically, the film is also remarkable. Peter Jackson and team, whose careful use of CGI mixed with astonishingly beautiful real locations only enhances the film, shows how computer effects should be used, unlike the latest "Star Wars" pictures, where the effects overwhelm everything else. Gollum, for example, is a far better character - in animation, voicing, writing, emotion and movement - than Lucas's horrid Jar-Jar Binks. Andrew Lesnie's cinematography once again makes the New Zeland locations look breathtakingly beautiful and epic. Howard Shore's score adds drama, tension and excitement without calling too much attention to itself. Production design is, once again, first-rate. "The Two Towers" is not a flawless picture, but it is grand, epic filmmaking unlike anything I've seen in recent years. The continuing story of these great characters continues to be compelling, the realization of this world by Peter Jackson and crew is visually stunning and many scenes here are powerful and incredibly memorable - especially the Helm's Deep sequence, which is more amazing than anything I've seen on the big screen in recent memory. One of the year's finest films.
Rating:
Summary: Epic!
Review: The Two Towers is the second part of Peter Jackson's trilogy based on JRR Tolkien's epic fantasy masterpiece, the Lord of the Rings. The Fellowship of the Ring has just been broken and our heroes are now all heading in different directions, all following their own paths. Merry and Pippin have just been captured by a horde of Saruman's foul Huruk-Haï who, following the sorcerer's orders, are taking them to his tower of Isengard, and Aragorn the Heir of Gondor, Legolas the Elf and Gimli the Dwarf are running to their rescue across the plains of Rohan, land of the Rohirim horsemasters. Taking the advantage of a clash between the orcs and a band of Rohirim, the hobbits manage to escape into Fangorn, the old forest, home of the legendary Ents. There they'll meet an old acquaintance. Meanwhile Frodo, the Ring-bearer, and his friend Sam are on their way to Mordor. It won't be long until they become lost, nor before they realize they're not alone. Gollum, the filthy creature who once possessed the One Ring, has been following them all along. They capture him, but soon Frodon takes pity and decides to release him in exchange for Gollum's word that he'll guide them to Mordor. Once again, Peter Jackson managed to bring to screen the enchanting spirit of JJR Tolkien's complex novels. I personally liked Gollum's character a lot, as well as admired the creature's beautiful computer graphics animation. And the Battle of Helm's Deep, the terrible final conflagration between Théoden's people and Saruman's army of ten thousand orcs, is just as formidable. I'll have to read these books again!
Rating:
Summary: Stupendous!
Review: "They don't make movies like that any more." This is reference to Cecil B. DeMille's spectacular remake of THE TEN COMMANDMENTS. I mention one of the few universally acclaimed film epics of all time because with THE LORD of THE RINGS-THE TWO TOWERS,
Director Peter Jackson has staked unchallengable claim to motion picture immortality. Visually the movie is staggering in technological excellence. It seamlessly combinines sweeping photographic grandeur with superlative integration of CGI and modelwork(Claymation & Superdynamation)that humbles even the work
of IL&M, and would have made Ray HarryHausen proud. Thematically, the story is truly grand and has raised film making--again--to the level of Mythological. Those familiar with Tolkien's literary epic--with rare exception--have been astounded by this director's monumental artistry in cinematically incarnating one of the greatest "stories" ever written.The cast(humans;creatures; monsters;)is brilliantly essayed.(Sean Astin deserves particular recognition as Frodo's "guardian" friend, SAMWISE). The complex plotting is clearly delineated;and ACTION(quest development;battles; epic romance interludes)ranges from apocalyptic to majestic. THE LORD of THE RINGS-THE TWO TOWERS magnificently continues what was begun in THE FELLOWSHIP of THE RING. Peter Jackson has created a unique work of film making that is both artistically wonderous and breath taking entertainment.It is a stupendous achievement.(10 Stars)
Rating:
Summary: I loved It!
Review: This is a very good movie. The story is great (and the movie is better than most at following the book). The movie also has amazing special effects. You can really care about these people.
Rating:
Summary: Brilliant Continuation of LoTR Trilogy!!
Review: Worried about some director ruining the first film by creating a so-so sequel? Not Peter Jackson. Of course, when you base your movies on the Lord of the Rings epic by JRR Tolkien, you just can't mess it up. Like the book, Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers gets even more involved and more adventurous than Fellowship, though it moves along a little slower. Gollum makes a huge presence, new characters are introduced, and battles are a-blazing. This film is darker than the first, and a little creepier. I was worried about how they would pull off the Ents, but I was, as usual, amazed with them.The movie ends with the Battle of Helm's Deep and Gollum swearing the wrath of Shelob on Frodo and Sam, which gets you REALLY ready for the final installment, LoTR: The Return of the King. The finale of Two Towers is worth a little bit slower movie, but all of the detail, excitement, and plot development is there in full battle armor. Wonderful experience!!
Rating:
Summary: Undescribable
Review: This movie was awesome, to say the least.
Director Peter Jackson took Tolkiens already exciting story and made it into the best movie I've ever seen. The plot was exciting and intriguing, leaving me counting the days till The Return of The King comes out.
Several people I saw the movie with complained that the details were confusing, but it's actually alot simpler than it seems. Good vs. Evil is the basic rule. Others complained about details left out from the book, and other details that were added. It seemed to me that the director did the best he could to stay with the book in the 3 hours he was given (you could take a week for each movie) and the few things he changed only made the plot more understandable.
I can't think of anything to complain about, besides afew moments of talking trees (which I found kinda boring) and a cheesy love story. Overall the movie was great, and I would see it for the special effects alone. I recomend it to anyone.
Rating: 
Summary: Not as good as Fellowship
Review: My god, TTT is a good movie, but it just seemed to me that the screenwriters were having a competition over who wrote the exact opposite of the book the most times into the script. Faramir taking the hobbits to Gondor? The Ents not wanting to help after Entmoot?? Aragorn nearly dying??? Theoden leading Edoras people...to Helm's Deep???? The Elves turning up to help? What?! Gimli son of Gloin gets turned into a comedy character, and Arwen, Elrond and even the Wargs get precious screen time when they should never even be there. Finally Gollum gets overfeatured and Helm's Deep is just too damn long. Incredibly, none of the climaxes of the book are in the movie either: Saruman is not thrown off by Gandalf and the hobbits do not get to Cirith Ungol and Shelob. Still, I find the movie worthwhile because of: Gandalf fight with the Balrog (AWESOME sequence)
Treebeard, Fangorn, Ents and Helm's Deep itself (very well done)
Eowyn (beautiful and graceful)
Good movie is better than no movie. But on the basis of it I just wonder what shall we expect of "Return of the King"? Will Peter Jackson freely rewrite it too?
Rating:
Summary: Awesome to Behold
Review: If you have the good fortune (which I did not) of seeing "The Two Towers" in a theater that doesn't contain a man coughing his brains out with an obvious case of neo-Bubonic Plague strain, then you, my friend, are in for treat. "The Two Towers" not only lives up to the grandeur and unmatched spectacle of "The Fellowship of the Ring," it surpasses it with a greater focus on character and a subdued (but still prominent) focus on exposition. It is also obvious now, when all is said and done, that Peter Jackson's trilogy will be considered the greatest achievement in the history of cinematic fantasy. Critics that bash it now as too long or for fantasy geeks only will have to eat crow when these movies are still beloved decades from now. How did Jackson do it? How did he make a film like "The Two Towers," one that cost over $100 million to make and yet still feels entirely handmade? How did he keep a story compelling that should have run out of gas long ago? However he did it (one assumes it involved lots of late hours and an inordinate amount of help), you the viewer get the end product, and what a sight it is to see. "Two Towers" avoids the plodding narrative of "Fellowship" by breaking up its main characters into groups. With three main storylines going on at once, Jackson alternates between subplots so that the story never grows too stale. It also has a stronger grip on characters, showing them in moments other than fighting or running away, and that actually helps the film breeze by (3 hours have never passed so quickly, unless you slept through Dances with Wolves). And you never feel like you see the same thing twice during "Towers." There are always new things to see, new places to go, or new homages to be alert for (in particular one to "The Wizard of Oz" at the gates of Mordor). Of special note is Gollum, the CGI creature who never feels forced into the picture. He's a real character, and at no point does he just feel like a cartoon stuck in a live action flick. Are there problems with "Towers"? Sure. The bad guys have terrible aim and the good guys, natch, do not. There's so much latent homoerotism between Frodo and Sam you half expect them to start kissing halfway in. And Jon Rhys-Davies jokes are a little corny, but welcome relief in a movie this intense. There's also not enough of the prominent villains (Christopher Lee's Saruman or the evil Sauron). Still, movies don't get much better than this, and "Towers" seems to only justify Peter Jackson's growing legacy. A triumph.
Rating:
Summary: Good movie, not so good adaptation **spoiler**
Review: When I saw The Fellowship of the Ring I left the theatre feeling confused. I had been assured by several self-proclaimed "Ring Fanatics" that it was a close adaptation to the book. If any of those people try to tell me that with The Two Towers I'm afraid I will have to think that they are liars or idiots. Very little of the book is left. I spent most of the movie trying to figure out what the creator's were attempting to say. There must be some sort of statement they want to proclaim that they are using Tolkien's work for, or should I say, abusing. Why didn't they just make up their own story, I wonder. Oh, yeah, they are making millions by distorting these works. My main issue lies with the destruction of characters. I understand perfectly that you can't fit these books all into 9 hrs of film. But that doesn't mean you have to destroy the wonderful characters that Tolkien created. ...** If you read the book and liked it you probably won't like this movie. If you haven't read the book and like adventure movies this movie is excellent.
| 
