Rating: 
Summary: Hugh Jackman makes the heart beat a bit faster!
Review: Although Meg Ryan was enjoyable as the female lead, there were far too many closeups of her face. Her hair looked a perpetual mess and we could all see the choice of lipliner color. Meg Ryan is a pretty woman and would benefit from an image change. Hugh Jackman was wonderful as the male lead and exuded masculine charm and refinement; quite a departure from his role as Wolverine and Eddie in "Someone Like You." The movie's dialogue was fresh and witty. A good supporting cast helped this movie succeed. The subplot of Kate's ex-boyfriend in a mental hospital was a bit far-fetched. However, it was saved by his analogy of time-travel to a dog viewing a rainbow.
All in all a likeable movie. Hugh Jackman is wonderfully handsome and sexy. PUT HIM IN MORE MOVIES!
Rating: 
Summary: NOT EVEN A GOOD DATE FLICK- BORING
Review: Went with a few other late 20's early 30's couples and we all found it boring. Yes it is a cute romantic typical date flick. But it just goes on and on and despite a couple of good lines is generally a weak flick. I usually rate movies 4 ways. Worth $8.50, worth a matinee, good rental, and a waste of $4. This one is a good rental. Don't waste the big bucks at the theater.
Rating:
Summary: A sweet, funny, and enjoyable romantic comedy
Review: This film has been getting pretty tepid (to worse) reviews, so I went expecting to enjoy Hugh Jackman (as always) but with less than glowing expectations about the rest of the film. I was pleasantly surprised. The entire ensemble works well together, the film has many moments of charm and humor, and (despite a few logical leaps of faith) it doesn't insult one's intelligence. This isn't deep, it isn't "art," and it's not going to win any Oscars. But you're not going to feel like you wasted your $8.50, either. (And yes, Hugh is great. But what he REALLY needs is a Gladiator-type role to break out -- he was BORN to play hunky, conflicted epic heroes.)
Rating: 
Summary: 100% Enchanting
Review: I didn't expect too much before I entered the theater. However it was just a little too long to sit through the 3 hour Lords of the Ring after Christmas. It was to my surprise that this is not just a light-hearted, less than 3 minute laugh romantic comedy (have you even squeezed a smile during Shallow Hal?). The pace, the casting and the wardrobe of the movie are perfect. The contrast between the 19th century gentleman Hugh Jackman and the 21st century New Yorker Breckin Meyer is extraordinary structured. The jokes are clever and short. The plot, a mix of historical reference and fiction is imaginative (though the jumping off the Brooklyn Bridge part is not convincing at all). This is a typical Meg Ryan role while Hugh Jackman has all the charm and class as the Duke (much better than Swordfish). Breckin Meyer, who plays the little brother is the best of all. He shines through the movie and steals quite some scenes.
Generally speaking, I enjoy it very much and highly recommend it to anyone who is tired of the regular romantic comedy which usually goes nowhere.
Rating:
Summary: Stunningly enjoyable romantic comedy
Review: Much to my surprise, this personable time travel romance is the hidden gem of the holiday season. Of course, the plot - handsome 19th century duke travels to the 20th century where he meets driven but unfulfilled career woman - does require a certain suspension of disbelief. If you can accept the premise, the rest of the story is predictable but charmingly executed. The dialoque is witty and clever, and the acting is first-rate. Hugh Jackman is yummy as the duke, and Meg Ryan is Meg Ryan; the supporting cast is terrific. The writers have wisely mixed comedic and romantic scenes. My only reservation is the internal inconsistencies and improbabilities - I was particularly distracted by the idea that a 19th century duke would have the faintest idea of how to cook dinner. Extra credit for most entertaining use of a "sign here" sticker.
Rating:
Summary: sweet yet lightweight and lacking
Review: While this story is sheer fantasy, it is sweetly intended but sorrily lacking in plot development, character interaction ( such as: Why didn't anyone visit Stuart in the hospital?) and overall momentum.The building of affection between the two main characters, not to mention conflict (the foundation of any good story) was almost absent from this film. The struggle of emotion between Kate (a modern executive woman of the 21st century) and Leopold (a man transported from the 19th century unvoluntarily) is almost non-existant since there is no real conflict adding dimension to the story. Hugh Jackman offers up a good performance despite a lacklustre plot and co-star. I fear Meg Ryan has played this role so many times that she lacks the sincerity to do it justice - though, in her defense she cannot be blamed entirely since the premise of the story doesn't exactly lend itself to becoming a romance that leaves you desperate for them to be with each other. I found myself almost indifferent to their success - occassionally (and mildly at that) feeling a slight wish if only for Hugh Jackman's character, Leopold. Jackman deserves Golden Globe consideration for making this movie as tolerable as it is. Simply put, this movie is sweet yet lacking in substance.
Rating:
Summary: Classic Meg Ryan!
Review: This movie was both romantic and comical. Hugh Jackman was quite convincing as a Duke from the 1800s. He was as handsome and charming as Meg Ryan was witty and cute. Meg Ryan was in true form in this movie including "Meg Ryan's" quirky smiles and frowns. Her character is lovably as usual. If you enjoyed You've Got Mail, you'll enjoy Meg in this one as well. However, beware...it IS a "fairy tale" with a modern twist. For us hopeless romantics, it is a win!
Rating:
Summary: This light hearted love story is worth seeing
Review: "Kate and Leopold" is not a masterpiece, but gets the job done. A story about lovers meeting across time is not particularly original. However, this film works because of the chemistry between Hugh Jackman and Meg Ryan. They hold it together in spite of its obvious flaws. Liev Schreiber as the bumbling time traveler who brings them together gives a solid performance. My advice is not too take the movie too seriously, but simply enjoy it for what it is. It is unapologetically escapist entertainment, and doesn't pretend to offer any answers to the existential mysteries of the universe. Does it deserve any Academy Ward nominations? No, but it will likely bring a warm smile to your face. "Kate and Leopold" is a good way for you and your significant other to enjoy an evening. It deserves four stars.
Rating:
Summary: sweetest, cutest love story
Review: Meg Ryan, as usual is adorable in this movie, and Hugh Jackman is utterly irrestible. "Kate & Leopold" is filled with funny, cute, sexy, feel-good moments. each character does a fantastic job at becoming real and making you beleive they are real. I recomend it for anyone. Because anyone and everyone in their right mind likes Meg Ryan, and if you don't Hugh Jackman is fantasic in this movie. I would give this more more stars if i could. go see it, you will fall in love with Kate and Leopold.
Rating:
Summary: Cute Movie
Review: This movie was very cute. Meg Ryan wonderfully plays the role of Kate, a woman who only has her job to keep her satisfied with life, and Hugh Jackman plays Leopold, a handsome duke from the 19th century who is transported to 2001 by Kate's ex, who lives in the apartment right above Kate's. This movie is heartwarming and funny, but if you focus on the scientific structure of a so-called "fabric in time," not everything computes with everything else. Undoubtedly a chick flick.
|
