Aladdin (Not Disney)

Rating:
Summary: Better then Disney
Review: A Goodtimes cartoon, Aladdin is better then the disne version an d cheaper

Rating:
Summary: Sucked.
Review: It wasn't terrible, but i did not like the animation, cheep leep, and how can you make an animated aladdin movie without robin williams? you can't, that's how.

Rating:
Summary: Way better than the Disney version!
Review: People may think whatever they please about Disney films being better than Goodtimes in quality, but when it comes to entertainment I prefer Goodtimes. This version of the classic tale Aladdin is more fun to watch than the Disney one made somewhere in 1992, it isn't filled with annoying and boring songs and really tells the story, I bet if Disney removed all the songs and crazy genie sequences the main scenes in the movie would be about 30 minutes long. This version has only one song played at the beginning and at the end, and all the rest is great fun to watch, Aladdin himself is kind of a funny guy, very believable and pleasent, Leila is really more charming than Jasmine as well, so, I give this one 5 stars, not because it has great animation, but because it is a lot of fun to watch. Recommended for kids and parents of all ages.

What I'm wondering is, is it really necessary to write (Not Disney) after the collection's titles? I think "(Goodtimes version) would be more appropiate. Disney isn't always the maker of the "original" and certainly not always the best, Aladdin is an example of that.