Rating: 
Summary: Oh, brother!
Review: These two films are geared to the gay market, with lingering shots on young studs; some other reviewers may deny this but they obviously didn't notice how the chief vampire eyed the young stud. (It's not that subtle!)I can say though that these two movies are well filmed The first movie is about a frat of vampires who want to initiate a young studly jock. These vampires are fangless though, using instead an amulet (similar in concept to 1983s "The Hunger"). I can't understand why, when two guys get into bed with a lady to feed from her they all remain in their underwear. She obviously gets a high from feeding them, but I can't see why... whether she's on drugs already, or not, because these vampires don't seem to be able to mesmerise their prey. The second film is about a young warlock who tries to initiate 3 studs into a covern. This is even less interesting than the first, but just as elegantly filmed.
Rating: 
Summary: the brotherhood of bad acting
Review: well what can i say, I got this movie as a birthday present! It's shocking just how bad the movie is, the acting is wooden, the storyline non existent and the loop holes are gigantic - the only good thing was the sexy half naked studs especially the blonde guy, what a pair of pecs. The guys should have kissed and made it what it was meant to be - soft porn.I did enjoy those bits mind you, very homoerotic.
Next my unfortunate friend who witnessed the horror:-
The only thing this movie is good for is maybe as a door stop. There is so much badness in the film, it makes me sick! I consider myself a bad actor, but compared to them, i'm oscar material. I can't believe they went so low as to use a plastic axe! And I'm pretty sure that the actors are all previous porn stars. Only sex - or teasing - makes this film half bearable. I think I would rather spend an hour and a half picking my nose rather than watch it again.
| 
