Rating: 
Summary: Hey now, it wasn't THAT bad
Review: I thought the movie was cute! No, it wasn't Oscar material and it was never meant to be. However, it did make for an entertaining watch. It was never meant to follow the original. There are MANY different types of psychotics out there, why just stick with some boring old guy that everyone has seen before. I liked it!
Rating: 
Summary: Well.... At least Mila Kunis is hot in this.
Review: I like the original American Psycho until late one night I saw that they had a sequel to it so I gave it a shot a my thought are without a doubt nowhere in a league with AP. The plot and story line is lame and predictable. the only true acting skills come from Bill Shatner and the ending is predictable. Mila Kunis was great in Family Guy (voice of Meg) but in this she looks like she's is rehersing for "Heathers 2"
Rating: 
Summary: oooh, hollwoods at its greatest !! BEST MOVIE EVER
Review: syke. yeah - i said syke. cause this movie sucked. i love how it referenced to parts of american psycho part 1 that didnt even exist - and that it actually conflicted with the original film. take some director with an almost recognizable spin off of a famous name (morgan J freeman) - mix him in with 20 days of filming and a budget of 3 million dollars - put it straight to video and then throw in some hollywood magic (ie blood, underlying messages to women, and captain kirk) and there you have it.
Rating:
Summary: AWFUL PSYCHO: ALL AMERICAN AWFUL
Review: This movie is garbage the first few minutes a cat is in the microwave. There is not excuse for this filth,the director and writer should be put in the microwave. Also 19 year old Mila Kunis can not act,thats why she is on a stupid program that 70's show. Not scary just stupid movie with tasteless scenes. NOT EVEN WORTH RENTING,UNLESS YOU LIKE SEEING A CAT IN A MICROWAVE JUST LIKE THE STUPID SCENE WITH THE DOG IN THE MICROWAVE IN THE LAME URBAN LEGEND MOVIE.
Rating:
Summary: I'm sorry everyone but I liked this film
Review: It's stupid ... and fun to watch.The only problem I had with it was what...was Captian Kirk doing in this film.The only reason I wanted to see this film is the fact I'm a huge Forever Knight fan.I did not like the first movie at all but I loved the book....
Rating: 
Summary: IT WAS GOOD
Review: Yes, it wasn't American Psycho, nor did it really relate, but American Psycho II All American Girl wasn't really meant to follow in American Psycho's footsteeps. If you look at this movie without it having to do with the first one, it is rather enjoyable. So it has a few plot holes and bad dialogue. It did keep my attention the entire time. Mila Kunis did a great job concidering the script she had to work with. She was likeable and keep the whole movie going. There were even many times where I laughed! This movie wasn't just another gorefest because there was no gore!! This movie's sole purpose was to entertain and it did. This movie, to me at least, was so bad it was good.
Rating:
Summary: VERY DISAPOINTED
Review: This is a disgrace to have the title ( american psycho) in this film and have it even been associated with american psycho the first movie. How can they call this American psycho 2? I thought the whole premise of the first movie was that it was all in batemans head? Anyway the first American psycho movie was brilliant, this one is a load of bull.Mila kunis cannot act- she did a horrible job as ( the girl) who witnessed her babysitter getting killed by bateman. I dont even think this girl ever has done a movie before only on tv- ( that 70s show). This was a cheesy pathetic movie-not at all beleivable that mila was a psycho and serial killer-definetly she was not good actress to put in this role and the story and plot were weak. COMPARED TO 1ST AMERICAN PSCYHO.William shatner played her college profesor and he was good - naturally of course cause he can act -mila cant and cant play this part well at all and milas counselar in the movie was a good actor/played part well but i am very disapointed in this sequel, if you can even call it that.This is a joke compared to the first movie and if any one says this movie is good like the couple reviews i read on here then they really must not have seen first american psycho or they got absolutly no taste.Go rent this movie and then see for yourself. But dont pay full price on here for it, not worth it.
Rating:
Summary: kiss off
Review: I personly loved this movie it had death fun & a female killer.
What more could you people want.I thought the plot stood up well
to first one & on top of that for the more mentally lacking people it
was more simple to follow.Yet it still had enough twist to keep me into it.
The ending was done very nicely in my
mind.I think this dvd is one you should own.for those who did not like it
you can kiss off.This moive was not meant to make think or mind numbing
brain parody it is what it is.Plain & simple just a great enjoyable movie.
Rating:
Summary: Awful
Review: This was honestly one of the worst movies i have ever seen. Most sequels to good movies are bad, but this pretty much was the worst sequel i coulde imagine. American psycho was a very good movie filled with dark comedy, good cinematography, and a good story. This film was just a slightly off-kilter teen movie with a lot of stupid, poorly crafted, painfully NOT-funny murder bits. A complete waste of time. The original is a must see, but i'd rather watch Barney on Ice than watch this film again.
Rating:
Summary: Cute at a ¿Made-for-TV¿ level
Review: I really didn't know what to expect from this movie. I had not seen "American Psycho". All I know of the first film is that it was about a serial killer, but filmed in a tongue-in-cheek feminist style, and got mixed reviews. The only connection we see to the first film is that the heroine as a roughly ten-year old "meets" the killer of the first movie. What happens there I won't reveal, but that meeting does form her personality for this movie. Which jumps to her as a college student. Or, more specifically, a college to train future FBI agents. Unlike the FBI training in "Silence of the Lambs", where the students actually learn how to catch criminals, this school seems to consist only of classes that teach about serial killers. The teacher is William Shatner, who is a rotting corpse of an actor in anything he does, so am I giving anything away to ask you to guess his fate? The movie is done in a tongue-in-cheek manner, which takes awhile to get used to. In fact, it takes so long to get into the right frame of mind that it does deserve a second viewing. It's got to be hard to treat this material where it has to handle both gruesome and comedic themes, but to it's credit it does do it with a lot of style. The heroine is self-assured about her role, and handles tight spots with no more emotion than if she had broken a nail. The only problem I had with it was that I wish it could have been somewhat "edgier". We have an R-rated movie with a bunch of college coeds in the cast, yet there is nothing close to nudity. You do get a lot of murders, but there is a surprising lack of blood and gore. It pretty much looks like it has been sanitized for TV viewing, which explains my title. I just wish they would have taken it further.
|
