Rating: 
Summary: What the hell?
Review: Hmmmm, this is a very strange sequel that is in no way as powerful as the first. This film was'nt too bad but it did get boring. Reagen on the other hand is a very sexy girl, and Richard Burton isn't too bad as the priest looking for answers.
Rating: 
Summary: Not Bad For A Sequel
Review: Exorcist 2: The Heretic aint that bad but you have to agree at the end of the movie had good special effects for the 70's.Okay I agree the 1st one is better but the 2nd one aint that bad.Give it a try for this movie you might like it I did.
Rating: 
Summary: Frightning,but rather strange!
Review: This is probably the strangest movie I have ever seen. The story takes place a couple of years later as a grown up Regan is being hypnotized to see if she still has the (demon) Pazuzu in her. Lots of trick Photography here. Kind of a tripped out Psychedelic movie 10 years to late. I especially like the ending when all the locusts attack. Its a departure from the 1st film,but still worth the look. Not as bad as everyone says it is. Believe me Iv'e seen alot worse!
Rating: 
Summary: BEYOND BELIEF...TRULY
Review: I happen to be one of the lucky few who saw the ORIGINAL cut of John Boorman's incoherent and preposterously silly sequel to The Exorcist -- the day it opened. The original ending had the audience throwing popcorn at the screen, after laughing for two hours -- as Linda Blair summons the locusts into the house in Georgetown, the people on the street, oblivious to the Satan/God/sex struggle inside for the past. oh, six hours, suddenly realize there is something funny going on in there, and run from their homes up to the house. It was one of the funniest things I have ever seen in a movie. It is almost impossible to believe that this movie ever got made, with names attached no less. It is strangley fascinating, like most of the worst movies of all time, and I would encourage anyone who has two hours to waste to definitely give it a look -- your mouth will be hanging open and you will be laughing a LOT. Have a drinking party and get plastered -- this is one heck of a crazy party!
Rating:
Summary: A Huge Piece of Garbage
Review: Never take any time to see this movie. I loved the first and then I saw this. Oh my god, it has to be one of the worst movies ever made. I wanted to give the movie zero stars, but amazon wouldn't let me.
Rating:
Summary: Just Awful
Review: I've been sitting here for some time trying to think of some way to describe the awful-ness of this film. I can't. There aren't enough negative adjectives in the language.Some of the worst acting, writing, and special effects you'll ever see. Nobody's heart appeared to be in this, from the cast down to the lackeys. Blair is as ridiculous and unbelievable as she was convincing and compelling in The Exorcist. And I can only assume Burton was paid a HELL of a lot of money to lend his name to this garbage, or that the casting director had something on him. This movie is laughably bad. If it wasn't so long and tedious I'd say, watch it for a laugh, but I can't even say that. Don't walk away, RUN away from this film.
Rating:
Summary: Greenstate Pictures
Review: One must ask him or herself, why was this film made? Perhaps its makers felt that they could create a sequel that depicted the aftermath of its groundbreaking predecessor, that met or exceeded it. Or provided somewhat of an absolution to Regan MacNeil's fate after her possession. Unfortunately, this theatrical disaster leaves its viewer floating aimlessly through a tedious, incoherent plot. The writing is obviously trying to scrape off the remainder of the 1st film to leave it with any plot-worthy material, yet the film is nearly two hours in length. Linda Blair's constantly light-hearted performance doesn't help much in the film's cause while Richard Burton's overplayed sullenness as the priest leaves his role forgettable. James Earl Jones as his character is admitably good . . . for a laugh. The Director tries to cover-up these faults with meaningless visuals, so those endeavoring to surface high-points of the film can feed of of its visual aspect. Those who have seen the first would most-likely think it's impossible for the sequel to be this bad, and manifest high-hopes for this one despite criticism, they will be especially dissappointed.
Rating:
Summary: NOT BAD, BUT STILL DOESNT HOLD A CANDLE TO THE FIRST ONE
Review: This movie isnt bad but the first one was magneficent. The actors stayed the same so I think it really helped this movie out for that fact. But for the most part I think they should have stopped after the first one.
Rating:
Summary: Alright sequel to The Exorcist
Review: The Exorcist was alright, but in some spots seems to make no sense. Not too Bad.
Rating: 
Summary: A good sequel
Review: The Heretic is a better sequel than what most horror movies have. Why does everyone put it down? I loved it the first time I saw it. True, it's not as disgusting and vulgar as the original, but it's still got a good plot. Sequels usually ruin films yet this one doesn't.
| 
