Rating: Summary: took my breath away Review: I saw it on the big screen when it first came out, and i distinctly recall that breathing required a conscious effort for at least a couple of hours afterward. That was another time, and i don't promise all or even any will have a similar reaction, but I sure was moved. A bit claustrophobic at times, but I think that was the point. It features a wonderful Jessye Norman performance of Strauss' Four Last Songs, which is about as exquisite a piece of music as this sordid little species has ever produced.
Rating: Summary: One of the best films set in Asia ever! Review: I saw this movie at the recommendation of a colleague who had lived for a while in Indonesia. I've always been interested in Asia and watch any good movies set in Asian countries that I can lay my hands on. This is absolutely one of the best movies about the region ever! Mel Gibson's acting is fabulous and he looks so hot - so much better than the way he looks now! Sigourney Weaver is also fantastic as Jill, the world-weary British diplomat, but Linda Hunt steals the show as Billy Kwan, the mysterious Chinese-Australian photographer who has amazing political contacts and seems to know everyone and everything in Jakarta. Unlike the characters of Guy Hamilton and Jill Bryant, Kwan remains a shadowy figure throughout the movie and the viewer is permitted only glimpses of his thoughts and dreams. It is Billy's character that holds the film together and elevates it above the standard issue romantic drama set in an exotic land, to a moving and haunting social commentary on poverty, politics and sexual mores, all in an extremely entertaining way. The locales and characters are completely authentic with no attempt at fake Hollywood studio shoots. Gibson and Weaver make an incredibly sexy couple but keep your eye on Linda Hunt if you can. If you have the slightest interest in Southeast Asia and just would like to understand what life was like for expats in the 60's in a volatile part of the world and with the shadow of Vietnam looming, this film is a must-see. Highly, highly recommended!
Rating: Summary: A rare document of Gibson and Weaver at their best Review: In addition to all the postitive comments about the film above, this movie is a rare opportunity to see a young Mel Gibson and Sigourney Weaver in, perhaps, their best acting roles. In spite of what the critics say about Weaver's "flimsy" performance, she was perfect for the role, and the chemistry between her and Gibson was electric.
Rating: Summary: great film Review: Let us remind ourselves that this film was shot in the Phillipines and not in Indonesia has some of other reviewers have alluded to.
Rating: Summary: It's the love story Review: Lots of flaws here, especially structurally, and in its confusion as to what it wants to be. But it is also beautiful, intensely romantic, with interesting people put into agonizing situations. I remember this as a movie as one of the sexiest love stories of the '80s-- the other one was "Witness" with Harrison Ford and Kelly McGillis, also directed by Weir, I believe-- he can really get an incredible intensity of sexual longing out of his pricipals. The scenes between Weaver and Gibson were totally electric, with the happy inspiration of showing them soaking wet a couple of times. No, her accent wasn't the best, but she made a wonderful physical character with Gibson's-- note her slow, rangy, aristocratic stride beside his urgent lope-- a very sexy Mutt and Jeff. And I vastly prefer Mel as a young upstart, too, than as an autumnal Hollywood monarch.
Rating: Summary: Location, location, location Review: Much hay is made of this film being made in Manila, the Philippines rather than in Jakarta. Ignore it. I have lived in Jakarta for 8 years and I can't tell that it was not filmed here. Film does a fantastic job at providing a glimpse of Javanese culture and the hard edge of life in a developing nation's capital, at least as it appears in Jakarta. There is no other dramatic film set in Indonesia worth seeing, at least from the West.
Rating: Summary: Always on my top ten list of great films. Review: My standard of excellence for films includes whether or not it can hold up over the years. This came out in '82 and viewing it again is as fresh a pleasure as when Year of Living Dangerously first came out. I always list it on my top ten films of all times. The cast is superb: not only do you get a sold performance from Mel Gibson as Guy, a journalist, but Sigourney Weaver does a great job as a diplomatic attache and possible spook. The real treat was Linda Hunt, as Billy, a photographer and idealist who pins his hopes on Guy (Gibson) as a friend who can grasp the deeper, human issues in Indonesia and not just skim the surface as another Western journalist, trying to make his mark reporting on an unstable political scene. Linda Hunt's performance as a man was so believable and superb, she won an Academy award. The film (made in the Phillipines) is not only a good view into the politics of Southeast Asia, but is a great story about a young man getting a baptism by fire as a naive journalist. If you haven't seen it, you are in for a real treat.
Rating: Summary: 5 stars ¿¿¿¿¿ FIVE BIG STARS * * * * * Review: One of those films that you won't forget after seeing. Every once in a while a film comes along that really changes how you see the world. " YEAR " will do just that. Wearer and Gibson give breathtaking performances for their GRAND introductions to the public. If you have an archive of films you've seen & loved, you probably own this BEAUTY. If you haven't seen it, treat yourself to a journey in an exotic world this film "Represents". Get a bowl of popcorn, your favorite drink, joint or whatever and be enriched TO THE MAX .
Rating: Summary: Contrasts and meaning Review: Peter Weir's film 'The Year of Living Dangerously' was shown at a campus film festival during my first year as an undergraduate (a few years after Linda Hunt had won the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for playing a male character), sponsored by the departments of political science, journalism, and East Asian studies. The setting is 1965, Djakarta, during a time when Southeast Asia was high on the scope of European radar and coming into more prominence for American eyes. Indonesia was (and is) a big country, with population and resources (both underutilised) the envy of East and West. The dictator Sukarno was playing a dangerous game trying the balance the two, internally as well as in foreign affairs. In the end, it did not pay off for him, and Indonesia has only recently begun to work at achieving a prominence a resource-rich, 100+ million populated country can attain. Into this tight-rope situation dropped Guy Hamilton (Mel Gibson), of the Australian Broadcasting Service, a fresh-faced journalist out to make a mark for himself, sabotaged by his predecessor and professionally ignored by other Western journalists (who had their own headline-deadlines to meet). However, a strange American/Chinese man, Billy Kwan (Linda Hunt), befriends him, and attempts to help him both professionally, personally, and spiritually. Billy takes Guy on a trip through the slums of Djakarta, preaching Tolstoy, charity and compassion, and tries to get Guy to see beyond the headlines. Billy also introduces Guy to Jill (Sigourney Weaver), a British agent planning to leave Djakarta. The tale wanders through politics, personal strife and decision-making, and the beginnings of revolution, climaxing with Billy putting his words into action and suffering a martyr's fate trying to get Sukarno's attention for the suffering poor, and Jill and Guy making a mad dash for the airport before the runways are closed. Those of us with benefit of hindsight know that Guy could have stayed, the communist PKI in fact did not succeed, and he could have continued to write articles and make a mark. But that would not have been as romantic. This movie is one of contrasts--the elegance of a British Embassy cocktail party contrasted with the poverty of the native Javanese; the cooperation of Billy against the ignoring of the other professionals; the native spirituality (which isn't exploited nearly enough) against the materialistic West (made worse when adopted by a native such as Sukarno). The music from Vangelis is an interesting accompaniment (remember Chariots of Fire?) and the cinematography grand in many cases. But subtlety abounds here--you may miss much the first time through. This is an atypical Weir film (but of course, that may be an oxymoron, for is there a 'typical' Weir film?). Australian, but it doesn't always seem so; artistic, but it doesn't always seem so--there are many such attributes. Weir always tries to inject meaning into his films in many ways -- the injection didn't quite take in every way in this film, and some meanings are a bit overdone, but overall, there is a good balance. This is not an action film (despite occasionally being categorised in this group). If you're looking for bombs bursting in air, look elsewhere.
Rating: Summary: favorite movie of all time Review: Saw this movie in highschool and was moved by every relationship in it. I'm still in awe of this film.
|