<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Another perspective
Review: I couldn't help but notice the negative attention surrounding this video. I saw this on PBS and eventually got a copy for myself. It is one of my favorite documentaries on Rome at present.
The Hail Caesar collection, by A&E, had always been my favorite but after seeing this PBS series several times I came to have a greater appreciation for it. The narration may seem monotone but I find it blends well with the atmosphere of the film. A documentary relies on images, and stills very heavily and this one is no different. It is because of this fact that the slow and methodical tone Ms. Weaver uses allows you to slip back into the past and enjoy a perspective that may be different than you'd expect.
I am a student of Roman history and I think that what PBS created here is excellent. And especially since they are writing for a broad audience and not just specialized historians who already know all of the events covered in the documentary.
Given the fact that this is put on PUBLIC television and it is not a required coure for Roman History I believe it deserves at least 4 stars. I give it 5 because of the harsh criticism it has received to this point.
I recommend this video/DVD to anyone with an interest in history, politics, poetry or just simple novel story telling. It is a fun journey that can be enjoyed many times over. I have personally seen it in its entirety at least 6 times.
Rating: 
Summary: 1st century flop
Review: I was shocked at how bad this film was, no real information just fluff and stuff. I have numerous historical DVDs but this one will be going on the bottom shelf.
Rating:
Summary: 1st century flop
Review: I was shocked at how bad this film was, no real information just fluff and stuff. I have numerous historical DVDs but this one will be going on the bottom shelf.
Rating: 
Summary: This could have been much better.
Review: I watched this on PBS. This could have been much, much better than it was. The documentary was at its best when reading from contemporary texts like the letters of Ovid or Pliny. It was at its worst during the narration. Sigourney Weaver narrated in a slow, utterly unvarying monotone, as though reading her lines for the first time and trying not to mispronounce any of the words. It is hard to blame her, since the script that she read from sounded like it was lifted directly from an uninspired junior-high history textbook. It would have been so much better had the narration consisted of reading at length from Tacitus or Suetonius, both of which exist in extremely entertaining English translations.The pictures were good, and the selections from Ovid, Pliny, and Seneca were very fine. The title is a little deceptive, as it covers the period only to the death of Vespasian, the year 79, other than a brief mention of the ascension of Trajan. This wasn't bad, but really could have been much better.
Rating:
Summary: This could have been much better.
Review: I watched this on PBS. This could have been much, much better than it was. The documentary was at its best when reading from contemporary texts like the letters of Ovid or Pliny. It was at its worst during the narration. Sigourney Weaver narrated in a slow, utterly unvarying monotone, as though reading her lines for the first time and trying not to mispronounce any of the words. It is hard to blame her, since the script that she read from sounded like it was lifted directly from an uninspired junior-high history textbook. It would have been so much better had the narration consisted of reading at length from Tacitus or Suetonius, both of which exist in extremely entertaining English translations. The pictures were good, and the selections from Ovid, Pliny, and Seneca were very fine. The title is a little deceptive, as it covers the period only to the death of Vespasian, the year 79, other than a brief mention of the ascension of Trajan. This wasn't bad, but really could have been much better.
Rating:
Summary: Terrific
Review: Sit back, relax and enjoy as you are taking back to the world of Imperial Rome. This documentary is meant for enjoyment and who knows maybe a little edumaction as well. Just don't analyze it too much. Perfect for any curious mind.
Rating: 
Summary: A waste of money
Review: This must be the worst viedo documentry of Roman history ever produced. Sigournery Weaver was the worst possible choice for narrator. Just read the comments below. The emperors are all villified. I can't believe the producres included a comment by one historian who compared Augustus' conquest of Egypt to Hitler's conquest of France! There is no attempt to understand Roman culture other than a superficial glance. The Romans are continually compared to fascists, and that is completely anachronistic. The video may get some praise for including the wily Ovid, the writer of satirical sexual escapades. But then Sigourney Weaver accuses Augustus of suppressing free speech, as if Augustus was a bloodthirsty tyrant. Purchase the Greeks instead, a series also produced by PBS but far superior. The cinematography is magnificant, the music is superb, and history is explored with more objectivity. It is also voiced over by Liam Neeson of Schindler's list fame and Star Wars:1.
Rating:
Summary: A Superficial Look At First Century Rome
Review: Unfortunately, television history tends to overlook and oversimplify events. That is what happens with "The Roman Empire in the First Century." The writers have managed to make the dramatic events that shaped Rome appear boring, and are treated with little care for facts in many cases. The emperor Nero is hardly explored as to his personality (the greatest detail given over to the murder of his mother)and Claudius is skirted over as if his only purpose was to place Nero in the succession. Granted, it is difficult to put 100 years of such important events into a four hour program but I find it difficult to understand how such a pivotal year as 69 CE is reduced to a footnote with the empire going with little pause from Nero to Vespasian! It is as if Galba, Otho and Vitellius had never existed let alone been emperors of the Roman Empire. The program focuses on the views of Seneca and Pliny the Younger but does not provide much about their motives for cooperating with tyrants or much on their backgrounds. We are informed that Seneca was exiled at the whim of a tyrant (Claudius) but not told that he was probably involved in a conspiracy with Claudius's niece, Julia. Similarly, Pliny prospered under Domitian but after he was assassinated he turned to blackening his character. The experts who are interviewed for the program are certainly qualified to discuss their subjects but I have always wondered why someone like Barbara Levick, who as the author of biographies of Claudius and Vespasian, (or especially Michael Grant)would be invaluable. Sygorney Weaver, a great actress, reads the script at a monotonous pace. In short, if you want to understand The Roman Empire in the first century, buy books at Amazon and not this video.
Rating:
Summary: A Superficial Look At First Century Rome
Review: Unfortunately, television history tends to overlook and oversimplify events. That is what happens with "The Roman Empire in the First Century." The writers have managed to make the dramatic events that shaped Rome appear boring, and are treated with little care for facts in many cases. The emperor Nero is hardly explored as to his personality (the greatest detail given over to the murder of his mother)and Claudius is skirted over as if his only purpose was to place Nero in the succession. Granted, it is difficult to put 100 years of such important events into a four hour program but I find it difficult to understand how such a pivotal year as 69 CE is reduced to a footnote with the empire going with little pause from Nero to Vespasian! It is as if Galba, Otho and Vitellius had never existed let alone been emperors of the Roman Empire. The program focuses on the views of Seneca and Pliny the Younger but does not provide much about their motives for cooperating with tyrants or much on their backgrounds. We are informed that Seneca was exiled at the whim of a tyrant (Claudius) but not told that he was probably involved in a conspiracy with Claudius's niece, Julia. Similarly, Pliny prospered under Domitian but after he was assassinated he turned to blackening his character. The experts who are interviewed for the program are certainly qualified to discuss their subjects but I have always wondered why someone like Barbara Levick, who as the author of biographies of Claudius and Vespasian, (or especially Michael Grant)would be invaluable. Sygorney Weaver, a great actress, reads the script at a monotonous pace. In short, if you want to understand The Roman Empire in the first century, buy books at Amazon and not this video.
<< 1 >>
| 
