Rating: 
Summary: Weak, even for Sandler
Review: Yes it's a slow movie day when I'm reviewing Adam Sandler's "Mr. Deeds", an alleged remake of the 1936 classic film "Mr. Deeds Goes to Town" by Frank Capra. I have not seen the original, but by all accounts it was the superior of the two. One thing I know for sure, Sandler is no Gary Cooper. But I haven't posted in a while so here it goes.
Sandler plays a good hearted small towner whose rich uncle dies and leaves him a $40 billion empire. Oddly, Sandler, or should I say Sandler's character, seems no more surprised at this event than finding a nickel on the street. His attitude manages to carry over to the audience, as I found myself unimpressed by this vast sum. Maybe it's the tech bubble rubbing off on me - but hearing $40 billion just doesn't seem to impress the way it once might have. Not long ago inheriting a million dollars or more seemed outrageous. But with multibillionaires popping up on the news on a regular basis, I suppose it just takes a little more than a big round number to impress me.
Anyway, the film continues in a predictable manner and trots out the small town America virtues as superior to the big city ethic of greed and workaholism. Deeds gives away stacks of cash to total strangers. Meanwhile evildoers plot to take Deeds' empire from him and ruin his uncle's company. And of course the hardened, opportunistic tabloid reporter Babe Bennet unwittingly falls for Deeds over the course of 90 minutes until her undercover charade is revealed. All seems lost for romance until the two reconcile in a heroic ice pond rescue, and all is forgiven.
I'm sure any diehard Sandlerite will enjoy this film. I will admit that there is a certain appeal to one aspect of his act. There's just something hilarious about Sandler fighting with anyone, especially if he's just bludgeoning them over and over. Whether it's an imaginary penguin or Bob Barker it makes me chuckle every time. Otherwise there was little I found funny in this movie. In fact I can barely remember how it ended, not that it mattered, I'm sure it all worked out ok.
One bright spot I did find was Emilio Lopez played by John Turturro. He played Deeds' capable butler and provided the only interesting and slightly unique character in the film. His mannerism and ability to move silently and almost instantly about any room provided some relief from an otherwise uneventful movie.
Rating: 
Summary: Move on.
Review: Originally a movie made in 1936 about a Tuba Player from Vermont who went to the big city. It later became a television show in 1969 till 1970... and then in 2002 it was turned into a travesty by the worlds worst comedian Adam Sandler. Honestly, I used to like Adam Sandler... but after like 5 of his movies, that are all basically the same thing "Adam doesn't have money." "Adam needs money." "Adam gets money." "Adam is a good guy." "Hooray for Adam." - I wasn't sold on "Mr. Deeds." I felt bad for John Turturro. This movie was CLEARLY below him. Supporting actor to Adam Sandler?!? John Turturro was by far the funniest part of the movie. Adam Sandler was still doing the same tired, played out comedy. Move on.
Rating:
Summary: Boring!
Review: Come on now. There are a few parts in this movie that did make me laugh, but Adam Sandler himself did not have one funny line through this whole movie. Pretty much, a small town guy named Longfellow Deeds inherits 40 billion dollars from his dead uncle who owned a radio empire. An undercover reporter tries to get information from him and gets it, then Deeds finds out shes a reporter. In the end she feels guilty and they end up together. Its just so boring and stupid.
Rating:
Summary: I cant get into this one
Review: I usualy like Adam Sandlers movies, but with this one i just couldnt get into it. It just came off to me as a re-written, (in a diffrent way) version of Sandlers earlier movies. I didnt think this movie was very funny at all, and it was the same thing I have seen Adam play for years, a guy who has a heart of gold, yet this voilent side to him aswell, who finds a girl, struggles to get, then keep the girl, and then do somthing nice and get the girl in the end....sorry, i know alot of people here are saying this is a good movie.... but i feel i've seen it before! and was a bit too predictable IMO... apart from GOING OVERBOARD, this is about the only Adam Sandler flick i couldnt grasp.
Rating: 
Summary: Harmless, predicatable fun
Review: You know the premise if you have been near a movie theater or television set or video rental store in the past two months. I begin to worry when the slew of advertisements becomes a tidal wave of "everybody's going to see it so why don't you." But I was surprised - it was not a total flop and was even funny at times. What is so wretching is its utter predictability. Joe Schmo inherits 40 billion dollars. Naturally he is a country bumpkin, though (thankfully) not the usual stupid Southern hick but a good old boy from up North. And of course he moves to the ultra-big mansion replete with English-style furniture, butler and an evil guy who wants him out. Enter cute gal journalist (apparently one of the two jobs that exist in the world of cinema) who wants a big story about the local yokel but - you guessed it - falls in love. Through a series of totally unrealistic but totally unsurprising events the good guys win in the end. We've all seen it, heard it, read about it before and yet it still attracts us.
|
