Rating: 
Summary: Aren't there any widescreen prints left in existance?
Review: Once again (I believe it happenned with the Laser disc as well).Gulliver gets released with the "Ray Harryhausen Signature Collection" label on a panned and scanned version of the film.This time it's not only digitally mastered audio and video but remastered in High Definition.If they had to remaster it anyway,why didn't they start with widescreen elements.I think Harryhausen is a master and still give the film 5 stars.This DVD however is dissapointing.The extras are for the most part on other DVD's in the collection.And if we were only getting one aspect ratio, full screen was not the one to go with.
Rating: 
Summary: A Gulliver for Kids and Adults
Review: The special effects that let Gulliver be a giant in Lilliput and a mite in Brobdingnag are by the reigning genius of the day, Ray Harryhausen, but writer/director Jack Sher's 1960 film wisely uses them only in the service of the story. They have held up quite well, in part because they were used with restraint to begin withand they do nothing to interrupt or distract from the story and its points. (A minor exception could be the fight with a giant animated crocodile that must have been damn fun for the effects team, but even it is kept within reason.)Is this a film for children or a film for adults? The too-easy answer is that it is obviously a children's version: There is none of the trumped-up insanity element that the dreary-but-great-looking 1996 TV movie shoe-horned in for cheap drama. Neither is there the despair or genuine misanthropy of the book. Only Lilliput and Brobdingnag are visited. (No Laputa, Balnibari, Luggnag, Glubbdubdrib, Japan, or Houyhnhnms. The third world is Gulliver's own normal-sized world.) Gulliver puts out the fire in Lilliput by spitting wine. (In the book, the wine has been processed by Gulliver's bladder before he douses the fire with it.) Many characters, though not all, are all done in a cartoonish way clearly aimed at children. The travels are framed within the added-on love story of Gulliver and his fiancée Elizabeth. These are good choices. Children are inherently interested in the size contrasts. (It must add something to the experience that first they identify with the Lilliputians but later identify with Gulliver.) Spitting the wine is good enough. The cartoonish-ness makes the characters less threatening than they could have been. The love story is light and easy to follow, and promotes marriage. There are even a couple of musical numbers, one a love song that Gulliver sings. But Sher's script and direction have preserved some important points and spirit from the book: The gratitude of princes is short-lived. The causes of war can be shockingly petty. Vanity and unreason among the powerful make truth an early casualty in the pursuit of power. The various unpleasant characters (and the few nice ones) actually reflect things inside all of us. If it's okay for an adult to be reminded of these things in a playful way (certainly more playful than the original), then this film will amuse and inform that adult. And what are Gulliver and Elizabeth doing when their ball-field sized marriage license falls over them like a tent, and King Brob, peeking under it, is moved to say, "You're right dear. I'd better marry them at once." Ultimately, it has to go down in the books as a children's film, but surely an uncommon one: an intelligent adaptation, if abridged and lighthearted, of a great classic, that stands on its own for entertainment and, if you like, can whet your child's appetite for the book when that time arrives. Like the tacked-on love story, there is a tacked-on ending that suggests that the whole thing might have been a dream. I originally found this annoying. These days, watching with my little girl, I find that I'm glad for the admittedly sore-thumb reminder that the value of the story is not in whether those characters do or don't exist, but in what the story says about what is within us. As with all such points in the film, you'll have to talk with your child a bit to be sure that it comes across, but what a pleasure - to find a film that sparks such a discussion with your child. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Other films by Jack Sher: -------------------------------------------------------- Writer - filmography -------------------------------------------------------- Female Artillery (1972) (TV) (story) Goodbye, Raggedy Ann (1971) (TV) Move Over, Darling (1963) Critic's Choice (1963) Love in a Goldfish Bowl (1961) Paris Blues (1961) 3 Worlds of Gulliver, The (1960) ... aka Worlds of Gulliver, The (1960) Wild and the Innocent, The (1959) Kathy O' (1958) (also story) Joe Butterfly (1957) Four Girls in Town (1956) Walk the Proud Land (1956) ... aka Apache Agent (1956) World in My Corner (1956) (also story) Kid from Left Field, The (1953) Off Limits (1953) ... aka Military Policemen (1953) (UK) Shane (1953) (additional dialogue) My Favorite Spy (1951) -------------------------------------------------------- Director - filmography -------------------------------------------------------- Love in a Goldfish Bowl (1961) 3 Worlds of Gulliver, The (1960) ... aka Worlds of Gulliver, The (1960) Wild and the Innocent, The (1959) Kathy O' (1958) Four Girls in Town (1956) (with thanks to The Internet Movie Database
Rating:
Summary: Gulliver DVD - Fullscreen, Widescreen, & Idiots
Review: Yes, it IS disappointing that the Columbia Pictures "The 3 Worlds Of Gulliver" DVD is NOT a widescreen presentation. (For other aspects of the DVD quality, I'll leave that to other reviewers.) However, anyone with some knowledge of film techniques would not call someone an idiot for complaining about that. In fact, it's quite the reverse. While a movie may be shot with the widescreen view in mind (widescreen crop marks are engraved into the camera's view-finder), such pictures are actually shot "full screen" on the 35mm (or other size) negative. A "soft matte" of top and bottom black bars (added later), restores the director's on-set composition and gives the audience it's widescreen view. This can be seen in "Gulliver" by viewing the included "theatrical trailer" ... which is in widescreen format! What we're getting with this DVD is an "editing-booth" presentation of Gulliver rather than the "theatrical release" one. This is THE release from Columbia Pictures. Yet, there seems to be another release which properly has the "soft-matte" in place for widescreen presentation [see the review of the "region 2" release of Gulliver at http://www.zetaminor.com/ ]. This is how it SHOULD have been released here. So, don't be afraid to be called an idiot. Rather, complain to Columbia Pictures and call THEM the idiots. And demand OUR widescreen version!
Rating:
Summary: Gulliver DVD - Fullscreen, Widescreen, & Idiots
Review: Yes, it IS disappointing that the Columbia Pictures "The 3 Worlds Of Gulliver" DVD is NOT a widescreen presentation. (For other aspects of the DVD quality, I'll leave that to other reviewers.) However, anyone with some knowledge of film techniques would not call someone an idiot for complaining about that. In fact, it's quite the reverse. While a movie may be shot with the widescreen view in mind (widescreen crop marks are engraved into the camera's view-finder), such pictures are actually shot "full screen" on the 35mm (or other size) negative. A "soft matte" of top and bottom black bars (added later), restores the director's on-set composition and gives the audience it's widescreen view. This can be seen in "Gulliver" by viewing the included "theatrical trailer" ... which is in widescreen format! What we're getting with this DVD is an "editing-booth" presentation of Gulliver rather than the "theatrical release" one. This is THE release from Columbia Pictures. Yet, there seems to be another release which properly has the "soft-matte" in place for widescreen presentation [see the review of the "region 2" release of Gulliver at http://www.zetaminor.com/ ]. This is how it SHOULD have been released here. So, don't be afraid to be called an idiot. Rather, complain to Columbia Pictures and call THEM the idiots. And demand OUR widescreen version!
| 
