Rating: 
Summary: The Look and Feel are Right
Review: Clearly, the look and feel of Jackson's Fellowship is right on. The faithful rendering and visual "rightness" of The Shire, Moria, the Company, and the Orcs was much better than I had hoped for. There were a few quibbles here and there, but they were minor. The quibbles were distractions that will probably melt away on subsequent viewings. For example, the Hobbits should have been a bit more plump and their feet should have been smaller. I was particularly appreciative of Jackson's interpretation of Frodo's transformation when he wore the Ring. The sense of mystery and power was very strong. This is an instance where Jackson was better than Tolkien.Unfortunately, the the filmmaker opens himself to criticism when it comes to his rendering of the tale itself. I understand that time was a reason for eliminating some events and characters (Tom Bombadil, Barrow-Downs, Barliman Butterbur, and Bill Ferny). I might be saddened by their abscense, but I understand. I am having a harder time with the changes in substance. A few instances - When Frodo encountered the Black Riders at Weathertop he was not a shrinking violet. In fact, his wound was the result of his courage and the defense of his kinsmen. At the crossing of the Ford it wasn't necessary to be PC and have a female elf ride to the rescue, to me having a horse (Asfaloth) save Fordo was Tolien's choice. The connection between the charcters of Middle Earth and the animals is a central and important theme. The Council of Elrond was particularly disappointing. If you have read the book I shouldn't need to explain. The final scenes, when the Fellowship was broken, were disappointing as well. We didn't see that (once again) Samwise is smarter than he or anyone else gives him credit for. In the book, he uses his head to figure out Frodo's design. It wasn't some happy accident. Lastly, Boromir's last battle was his alone. Strider was too late. Boromir's courage and remorse at the last were his redemption. In the book we are able to glimpse Strider's less than super-human reality. He doesn't always come to the rescue and he can be indecisive. Two parting comments - Strider needs sword-play lessons! In real life he'd have been cut to shreds if he exposed himself as he did in the film. Voice-over during the travel scenes would have been a great way to communicate the history underlying the events and characters.
Rating: 
Summary: This is how you do it !!
Review: This movie is awesome, it delivers three times the value of most other movies. It is longer, more interesting, more scenic, and more impressive.
The casting choices bordered on perfection. The scenery was spectacular. Best of all, the movie is a good influence for children. I find this to be extremely rare for a Hollywood product.
Too bad we have to wait a year for the next part. I'm pretty sure I will see this one at the theatre again. Best movie I've seen in a long time.
Rating: 
Summary: My thought about Lord of the Ring
Review: I loved Lord of the ring. It was the best move i'v ever seen! My favorite was the wood elf with the blond hair i thought he was cute (L). I can't wait for the other 2 movies to come out ! the ending left me wondering and my heart sunk when it said THE END. But i hope the other 2 movies will be just as good as the first!?!?!
Rating:
Summary: Too Good To Be True.
Review: I saw the film today and i only have one thing to say ... When is the TRILOGY Special Edition DVD released ??? I WANT IT.... Fantastic movie... Amazing characters ... and very very good special effects ...
Rating:
Summary: Lord of the movies
Review: This is the best movie I've ever seen, and that's saying something for I've seen a lot of movies. I have never read the book or even heard of the word hobbit, all I knew was that I would go because I'm a movie fanatic,the special effects look awsome,and my dad would probaly croak if I asked to see Harry Potter one more time. The special effects were amazing I'll never know how they made the hobbits look so small, but the cast went along great with acting along how small Frodo was suppose to be. The movie may be 3 hours long but it's worth the time. Everyone is so convincing in their roles, Gandalf acts like a real wizard, Merry and Pippin are as troublesome as can be, Sam is as loyal to Frodo as Possiable, and Frodo couldn't be played any sweeter.The movie may be a bit scary at some points and violent a bit also but that's all part of the fun. I can tell you that I even cried at some parts and I'm not one to cry. I'm telling everyone I know to go see this movie. I havn't even read any of the books yet and I'm not going to because I want a suprise when the next movie is released.But young or old, weather you've read the books or not everyone should see this movie. This movie would most likely make J.R.R Toliken pround.
Rating:
Summary: awsome movie!!
Review: this movie was an awesome experience, in fact i liked it so much
i saw it three times and am going to see it again with my sis.,
melissa Goodman, she is 8. I have read the book and think that they did a fantastic job in making the characters come to life.
the movie made me want to read the book... so I did,even my little sis. is done w/it.
Rating:
Summary: I couldn't believe my eyes/ears!
Review: I have seen this movie 5 times (each time with different people). I just can't get enough. It seems as though this movie gets better and better after each viewing. I don't want to give anything away but this movie gets even more emotional every time too. The special effects are jaw dropping, along with the musical score and sound f/x. I have not read the book series, but I heard that the makers of this movie left out alot of boring scenes, and that this movie intensified some scenes better than the book did. I think Peter Jackson did a superb job at making the characters real; You can really connect with them in a personal way. Even though you sit in the theaters for 3 hours, it doesn't seem that long. The ending was not disappointing to me as it was to others, even though you are left wanting more. It ends where the first book ended and where the second book starts.
Rating:
Summary: Possibly the best film of the year.
Review: THE LORD OF THE RINGS: "THE FELLOWSHIP OF THE RING" is an epic struggle if you will. Relying on 190 million dollars for all three films, with each film rounding at three hours, wouldn't it get a little tight to fit it all into the budget? Having a lower-than-average cast, a director never even attempting a major blockbuster before, and being based on a very popular book where expectations skyrocket- wouldn't audiences share enough gratitude even if they hadn't seen the film firsthand? "RINGS" is an astonishing, ground-breaking surprise. THE LORD OF THE RINGS opens with a fearsome, monstrous battle, introducing the ring and the past behind it. The epic lifts off immediately with sword-and-sorcery action, and obviously- magnificent special effects. We are then introduced to the hobbit, Elijah Wood, Ian McKellen, and Ian Holm. When Frodo (Wood) accepts the ring from his Uncle Bilbo (Holm), the fearful and epic journey begins, bringing you into the most magnificent world ever visualized. Creatures and demons await them at every turn. The group of nine struggle to reach Mordor, where the ring must be destroyed. This film is the best fantasy film of all time. I have to say that. Bigger than "Star Wars" and "The Wizard of Oz", this renown and triumphant vision of the classic story is power packed with stylized fun and adventure to rock your mind. I literally was on the edge of my seat. The film is honestly that good. It is probably the best film of the year. "RINGS" is obviously off to a magnificent start, and I cannot wait for THE TWO TOWERS to come out. This film is too good. Everything is perfect. It is so good, you don't even realize you're in the theater for three hours. The scenery is the best. The action and special effects follow. Continuing the promising film is obviously the wonderously powerful story, and the powerhouse performances that sizzle on the stove. What created the biggest craving for my mind when watching the film, was its ending. I completely forgot that there really can't be a conclusion because the two sequels follow. The film just kind of ends, which kind of left me in a state of wonder. The thirst for more is left with me. "RINGS" doesn't allow you any guess into the next adventure, which builds a lot more anticipation. The dramatic scope of its sincerity and promise of near-perfection fills the glass immediately with this first installment. There isn't a shred of doubt in my mind that the next two pictures will rise and be as glorious as this first film. Whatever level or scale of genre you're looking for with this film, you have it. The film is an instant classic. I loved every glorified minute of it. The action and emotion is there. I've never read the book, and I don't think I'll want to. For the first time, my fear is that the book may undergo the film. Fantasy takes its toll being the biggest and best ever, and THE LORD OF THE RINGS is a promising treat to being superior to its word, and absolutely (and perfectly) satisfying to the entire audience. QUOTE: "THE LORD OF THE RINGS is excellent, one of the best of the year. Everything is perfect. Nothing falls short, or sinks below expectations. Action, adventure, visual effects, amazing performances, magnificent 'story-to-film' transformation, and emotion rule the screen. Topping STAR WARS and THE WIZARD OF OZ, "RINGS" is the best fantasy film of all time. I have no doubt that the sequels will be as disarming and powerful as this film. Renowned, rewarded, and revolutionized, THE LORD OF THE RINGS is a brilliant adventure-drama that left me in a state of awe! My anticipation and excitment grows, awaiting the next film to come in December."
Rating:
Summary: The best movie EVER!
Review: This is the best movie ever.! I loved how it portrays the book almost exactly. You notice I said almost. There were allot of things left out of the movie but they weren't very important. Some things I thought were were very funny for example, Tom Bombadil. They made up for it though. I could buy it watch it every day for a month and I would never get bored of watching it. I would defenantly advise you to see it if you haven't already. The only problem was the fact that Arwen was in the movie. She appeared once in the book but that was it. Besides that it is an awsome book and movie alike. I advise you greatly to see it and read it.
Rating:
Summary: A deeply moving movie of friendship and good vs. evil
Review: Many people have already hit on the virtues of this movie, so I won't repeat them. Instead, I'll address the few critics who have posted here. The extreme minority that didn't like this film seemed to have three main complaints: 1. The movie doesn't stand alone- Okay, granted. But it was never meant to. If this had been made for TV, it would have been a miniseries. For the first time, a director has taken the miniseries format to the big screen. After seeing the attempt to condense this tale into two movies during the late 70's, I can understand why he avoided going that route. 2. The movie is violent, and is just one battle after another- Sure, but so was Star Wars, Saving Private Ryan, and a host of other great films. The only possible reason I can think of that people have this reaction is that they had a different perception of the story before watching it. Many seemed to think this was a kids movie, apparently because they seemed to think that fantasy=kids. Let's be clear, this is a beautiful story of friendship and triumph, but it is not for young children. 3. "The characters were flat" or "there was no emotion"- This I can't explain, unless people who felt this way just simply couldn't relate to characters in a fantasy setting. I have seen this movie 3 times now, and every time the people I am with, and those all around us, are in tears by the end of the movie. How can you not be moved by Gandalf's love for the Shire and the Hobbits? Or Boromir's anquish over the fate awaiting his people in Gondor, or his courage at the end of the movie? Or Sam's unwavering loyalty and devotion to Frodo? Or Frodo's courage when he offers to take the ring to Mordor? Or Bilbo's breakdown when he realizes what Frodo must face because of him? Or Merry and Pippin's courage when they drew the Orcs away from Frodo? I could go on forever. The point is, there is more depth of character here than I have ever seen in a movie. The difficulty for some, I think, is understanding that just because the characters are wizards, hobbits, and elves...they are also all very human. My advice to anyone is: Go see the movie. At the worst, you are out 8 bucks and 3 hours. At the best, you will be treated to one of the most beautiful stories ever made.
|
