<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: poor printing quality !!!
Review: After comparing the prints on Kodak premium high glossy photo paper and Canon glossy photo paper plus, that came with my Canon i560 printer, I decided to get way from Kodak. It shows very grany texture especially in the dark area and colors are very dull. Canon paper reproduces much vibrant color and texture. After my own experimentation with papers, I searched on internet to find reviews on many different brands of papers. It seems like Kodak papers in general don't have good ratings.
Rating: 
Summary: Don't waste your money
Review: I am not usually moved to write reviews, but I am really unhappy with this product. I have a Canon i950 which came with a sample of Canon Photo Paper Pro (which yielded phenominal prints). Kodak High Gloss "premium" 4 x 6 paper is longer than 4 x 6 print, requiring the user to trim pictures (annoying). I might excuse that IF I got nice pictures. The pictures look terrible! I tried 3 different print settings to see if that would help, it didn't. They look like they were printed with a cheap printer. Canon Photo Paper Pro is the way to go. Don't waste your money on this.
Rating:
Summary: Don't waste your money
Review: I am not usually moved to write reviews, but I am really unhappy with this product. I have a Canon i950 which came with a sample of Canon Photo Paper Pro (which yielded phenominal prints). Kodak High Gloss "premium" 4 x 6 paper is longer than 4 x 6 print, requiring the user to trim pictures (annoying). I might excuse that IF I got nice pictures. The pictures look terrible! I tried 3 different print settings to see if that would help, it didn't. They look like they were printed with a cheap printer. Canon Photo Paper Pro is the way to go. Don't waste your money on this.
Rating: 
Summary: Favorite Paper
Review: I've tried other less known 4x6 photo papers, they produced decent prints, but I thought I would try out these Kodak 4x6 sheets. I was instantly amazed after my first print (on a Canon S9000). The quality was about that of something professional. I'm going to stick with Kodak 4x6 photo paper for 4x6 prints. You may pay a little more (if any) for this product but in return you get wonderful prints.
Rating:
Summary: Wrong Size!
Review: The package says this is 4X6 paper, but it isn't. It's actually 4X6.5! I feel ripped off! What's the point of having a printer capable of edge to edge printing when I have to cut off an extra .5 inches on my pictures when using this paper? I've had good luck with Kodak's 8.5X11 paper which was the actual size advertised on the package. Why is this different?It just doesn't make any sense. Is this a design flaw on Kodak's part?
Rating:
Summary: Wrong Size!
Review: The package says this is 4X6 paper, but it isn't. It's actually 4X6.5! I feel ripped off! What's the point of having a printer capable of edge to edge printing when I have to cut off an extra .5 inches on my pictures when using this paper? I've had good luck with Kodak's 8.5X11 paper which was the actual size advertised on the package. Why is this different? It just doesn't make any sense. Is this a design flaw on Kodak's part?
Rating:
Summary: Excellent prints with Canon i560s printer
Review: Using my Canon i560s printer, Kodak's recommended printer driver settings, and Kodak's free software for printing, this paper produces near flawless photos. They are semi-gloss (not high-gloss like Canon's Photo Paper Plus Glossy that comes with the printer). This paper has been reformulated recently (according to the packaging) and I will continue to use it for all photos. I have been unable to get Canon's software to print accurate colors on this paper - so use Kodak's! Canon's software (Easy Photo Print) won't print accurate colors even on their own Photo Paper Plus Glossy paper (and there is no way to manually tinker with the color settings in Easy Photo Print - you can in the Kodak software via the Canon print driver). If you run a comparison, you will see that Kodak has got the color thing nailed cold and Canon does not, regardless of paper type. The only detectable flaw I've seen in any print on Kodak's Premium Picture Paper is on photos with very dark/black areas. If you hold the print at a sharp angle in bright light (you never would unless looking for this flaw) you can see a slight decrease in the reflectivness of these really dark areas that you don't see using the Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy paper. Nobody who has looked at my prints (except me) has noticed this flaw - so don't worry about it. By the way, I much prefer the semi-glossy nature of this paper to Canon's Photo Paper Plus Glossy which truly is so glossy it can be annoying in some lighting conditions. The Canon i560s uses dye-based ink for printing photos. I think pigment-based ink will have different results (Canon mixes the 3 dye-based colors to produce black when printing photos, as the black cartridge is pigment based in this printer). For borderless 4x6 prints, you will have to cut a half-inch off the paper as it is 4 x 6.5 inches and the Canon printer driver does not allow flexibility at this time. If you want a white border, then no need to trim.
Rating:
Summary: Excellent prints with Canon i560s printer
Review: Using my Canon i560s printer, Kodak's recommended printer driver settings, and Kodak's free software for printing, this paper produces near flawless photos. They are semi-gloss (not high-gloss like Canon's Photo Paper Plus Glossy that comes with the printer). This paper has been reformulated recently (according to the packaging) and I will continue to use it for all photos. I have been unable to get Canon's software to print accurate colors on this paper - so use Kodak's! Canon's software (Easy Photo Print) won't print accurate colors even on their own Photo Paper Plus Glossy paper (and there is no way to manually tinker with the color settings in Easy Photo Print - you can in the Kodak software via the Canon print driver). If you run a comparison, you will see that Kodak has got the color thing nailed cold and Canon does not, regardless of paper type. The only detectable flaw I've seen in any print on Kodak's Premium Picture Paper is on photos with very dark/black areas. If you hold the print at a sharp angle in bright light (you never would unless looking for this flaw) you can see a slight decrease in the reflectivness of these really dark areas that you don't see using the Canon Photo Paper Plus Glossy paper. Nobody who has looked at my prints (except me) has noticed this flaw - so don't worry about it. By the way, I much prefer the semi-glossy nature of this paper to Canon's Photo Paper Plus Glossy which truly is so glossy it can be annoying in some lighting conditions. The Canon i560s uses dye-based ink for printing photos. I think pigment-based ink will have different results (Canon mixes the 3 dye-based colors to produce black when printing photos, as the black cartridge is pigment based in this printer). For borderless 4x6 prints, you will have to cut a half-inch off the paper as it is 4 x 6.5 inches and the Canon printer driver does not allow flexibility at this time. If you want a white border, then no need to trim.
<< 1 >>
| 
