Kodak Gold 200 Film (4-Pack)

Rating:
Summary: Old Faithful!
Review: 200 doesn't offer the clarity of 100, but it's far superior to 400, and it's extremely versatile. This film can be used in the widest variety of situations, and produces very nice results for enlargements. Camera & skill, of course, play a LARGE part in the end result, but I highly recommend using Kodak's Gold 200 for "everyday" use. Yes, it costs a little more..., but as the old saying goes, which is so true with film:you pay peanuts - you get monkeys.

Rating:
Summary: Value
Review: 200x film is just not very versatile. The Kodak quality pales in comparison to the cheaper 800x Fujifilm 4-pack, which gives chrystal clear pictures in most environments and is therefore highly versatile. Don't waste your money on Kodak.

Rating:
Summary: Value
Review: 200x film is just not very versatile. The Kodak quality pales in comparison to the cheaper 800x Fujifilm 4-pack, which gives chrystal clear pictures in most environments and is therefore highly versatile. Don't waste your money on Kodak.

Rating:
Summary: Excellent film, great photo definition
Review: Convenient package, excellent price. remarkable color photo definition. Great for indoor and outdour shots. No need to buy higher ASA grades unless shooting fast moving objects or unusual light conditions

Rating:
Summary: Kodak Colors r Real
Review: I can't tell the difference between this and the other brands, but I'm always happy with the quality of this film. I just buy the cheapest name brand I can find.

Rating:
Summary: works
Review: I can't tell the difference between this and the other brands, but I'm always happy with the quality of this film. I just buy the cheapest name brand I can find.

Rating:
Summary: Great for free film
Review: I got this film as a free special with the camera I purchased.
How can I complain??? :o)

Rating:
Summary: K series is better
Review: I have great pictures of people using the Kodak Gold K series (earlier version of Kodak Gold 200). The confidence I have of the Kodak film went down the drain with the new series. Even though a check with Kodak claims that only the packaging had change, with the film unchanged. I am however not convinced, as my people pictures suffered tremendously. Since the new series had started I had stop using Kodak 200. Or I tried disperately to buy the older K series Kodak 200.

Rating:
Summary: Best results with a reasonable price!
Review: I have tried this film in my brother's camera (Canon EOS 500N) many times and I've found that the results are always good, better than the other brands. Even some of my pictures are extra ordinary although I used only a standard camera and its standard lenses (28mm - 80mm and 75mm - 300mm) without any additional flash. The closeups are so clear and sharp, the landscape pictures are wonderful, and the portrait pictures are perfect. I also tried to take the picture of the sun with my custom-made filter and it is good enough. Even, I've tried it for a night scene and surprisingly, it works well! (of course, I have to use tripod or a steady structure). If there is anybody thinking that this film is not good enough, maybe it's your camera (or even you!). Anyway, it is cheaper than other brands (esp. Fuji) here in Indonesia.

Rating:
Summary: Good all around film
Review: I have used the Kodak Gold 200 but only if I can't find the Kodak Gold 100. Both do reproduce excelent color but for outdoor work and thats what I shoot 85% of the time my choice is the Gold 100. Don't get me wrong they are both a very good film to buy. I would choose Kodak over Fuji any day of the week. My experience with Fuji film was everything was on the blue side. And with my years of experience being a heatset web-press operator, printing magazines and adjusting ink, a person has to be able to look at a photo and tell if the color is right or not.
I just wish I could find it in 36 exposure!