Rating: 
Summary: Excellent camera with a great choice of lenses
Review: After shooting a few rolls of film with the SA-7 I'm impressed. The autofocus is quick and accurate and all the controls are intuitive and well-placed. Handling is excellent.Since you'll be limited to a Sigma lens I must recommend the 28-300mm Aspherical which is an outrageously convenient thing. It's a bargain and provides a range of focal lengths which may make it the only lens an amateur would ever need. Now the only thing I'm wondering is if I should have paid more for the SA-9 to get a faster shutter and date imprinting. You'll be happy with either of the two new Sigmas.
Rating:
Summary: great camera for an amateur
Review: Although, Sigma is very well-known for lenses, their cameras are not as popular, which is a shame. Anyway, this is the second Sigma Camera that I own. My previous camera was a Sigma SA-300. The camera has seven years, since I received it as a gift and it is still working very well. I wanted a new camera that have newer features, and that is why I decided to buy a new camera. Since, my experience with Sigma has been very good, and after shopping around (I looked at Minolta, Canon and Nikon) I decided to stick with the Sigma SA-7. One thing that I really liked is that the lense mount is metal vs. plastic in some of the comparable models for other brands. One set back is that it only accepts Sigma lensesand that it doesn't have ability to add a battery pack. The bag that comes with the kit is very nice and roomy. You get lots of features for the money, lightweight, affordable price, good metering system, user-friendly, picture preview, multiple exposure, self-timer.
Rating:
Summary: An old manual user reforms...
Review: And gets a Sigma. And is very happy with the camera.
I've used a totally manual camera for many years and got sick of the limited number and cost of new lenses for it. Could get a Sigma for the price of a new camera.
If you are an amateur, like I am, you only really use the 28mm or 50mm lenses. Sigma gives you that, on one lens with a macro included. The macro is sensational-easy to use and the results are terrific.
Highly recommend the camera.
Rating: 
Summary: Sigma
Review: Buying this camera was a total mistake. I had it for 3 months and it started using batteries, $36.00 worth in two days. I returned it to Sigma on December 10th and kept calling them. They told me they were too busy to look at my camera and call back at the end of January. I called again and was told the manager would call me, he never called. I then sent an email and they never responded. I went out of town for the weekend and came home and my camera had been left on the porch for 4 days in the cold and rain. I have never seen such poor customer service. Not quite sure about the camera yet because I wasn't able to use it very long.
Rating:
Summary: don't let name or price fool you
Review: great camera... sigma high quality lens.. alot of features for the price. prob low price because it isn't a "designer name" forget image.. get good shots and this cam especially with a 100-300 f/5.6 is a sweet set up
Rating:
Summary: don't let name or price fool you
Review: great camera... sigma high quality lens.. alot of features for the price. prob low price because it isn't a "designer name" forget image.. get good shots and this cam especially with a 100-300 f/5.6 is a sweet set up
Rating:
Summary: Outstanding Deal!
Review: I bought this camera for my wife for Christmas. She's an artist, and a pretty experienced photographer, but only wants the basic features rather than the complex sets of programs, etc., that you get on more expensive cameras or some of the similarly priced cameras from other makers. I have a Canon Eos Elan 7E, which I like a lot, but for her use this one is much better. It's light, extremely easy to use, works very well, and takes good photos. It's quiet (very), focuses fast, and looks a lot more expensive than it is. In fact, I have been so pleased with it that I'm considering getting an SA-9 for myself, since it's quite a lot lighter and more compact than the 7E. Don't be fooled by the post that says it's better to stick with a "name-brand"--Sigma IS a name brand, and you get a lot for your money with this package.
Rating:
Summary: Outstanding Deal!
Review: I bought this camera for my wife for Christmas. She's an artist, and a pretty experienced photographer, but only wants the basic features rather than the complex sets of programs, etc., that you get on more expensive cameras or some of the similarly priced cameras from other makers. I have a Canon Eos Elan 7E, which I like a lot, but for her use this one is much better. It's light, extremely easy to use, works very well, and takes good photos. It's quiet (very), focuses fast, and looks a lot more expensive than it is. In fact, I have been so pleased with it that I'm considering getting an SA-9 for myself, since it's quite a lot lighter and more compact than the 7E. Don't be fooled by the post that says it's better to stick with a "name-brand"--Sigma IS a name brand, and you get a lot for your money with this package.
Rating:
Summary: Had this camera for a year and love it
Review: I researched several cameras and finally chose this one not just because they make great lenses but the lense mount. Theirs is metal while Cannon, Nikon, etc are all plastic. This is not only cheap but flimsy. It takes great pictures and no one else gives you better value than Sigma considering the two lenses and bag. The bottom line is it takes great pictures and has lots of features. I don't care that some have said it a good starter camera--its like a bike. Lance Armstrong would win on any reasonably good road bike. Period.
Rating:
Summary: Returned for a Minolta SLR
Review: Purchased the Sigma based on price only. Mistake, I returned the Sigma SA-7 and purchased the Minolta STsi Kit, which we love and get amazing photo's from. The Minolta STsi also has a date and panorama feature which we use. I suggest staying with a name brand product. JH
| 
