Rating: 
Summary: With All Its Foibles, You'll Learn To Love It
Review: Before I purchased the QV-4000, some of my friends warned me that Casio had ample experience in digital technology, but none in optics. The warning was unnecessary. Casio buys its optics from Canon, and the pictures are stunning. As an early test, my wife took a picture of me from across the room. When I loaded it into the computer, I saw a tiny, pale blemish on one of my fingers. Thinking it an optical imperfection, I glanced at my hand. There it was. So. If you were told that digital cameras don't have enough resolution yet, consider that observation obsolete. Quite the contrary. If it weren't for digital processing, everyone posing for the QV-4000 would be well advised to first consult a dermatologist. Ok, it's not that bad, because Casio supplies a soft focus feature - but then there is a feature for everything. The camera is complicated; it's crammed with features few of us will ever use. Well, let me take that back, because I'm not a feature person. Let's just call it a feature person's paradise. All those features require documentation, and the documentation is replete but hard to use. The owner's manual warns against everything that corporate lawyers could think of. There are warnings against taking pictures while driving, or taking pictures while walking, for example. They wouldn't want you to bump into anything. In all the moronic warnings, there are some important ones, but these are rendered inconspicuous by the others. One inconspicuous but important warning is not to get it wet. No one would expect to hold the camera under running water, but the manual cautions against bringing the camera into the house after having it in the cold - or vice versa. Condensation is apparently enough to cause damage. So there you are. It's complicated, sophisticated, and fragile. My least favorite feature is the manual focus, which works through the digital display. Unfortunately the display is pretty small, so that it is hard to judge when something is truly in focus. Also, if the camera is not mounted on a tripod when manual focus is selected, one is forced to snap the picture while holding the camera at arms length. The alternative is to hold the camera in place and move one's face to it - but then there is no assurance that the camera hasn't moved too much. Oddly, one gets accustomed to all this, and, anyway, the automatic focus is robust enough to use for most purposes. One may choose a portion of the photograph on which the camera is to focus, so that the automation can be made to understand the photographer's intention. Automatic focus can be slightly imperfect, though, if the object is shiny metal. If it weren't for metal hydride rechargeables, the batteries would be more expensive than film. With the new batteries, however, pictures are so cheap that one may find one's self approaching photography differently. There is no reason to pass up a risky shot. If it doesn't turn out, send it to the bit bucket at no expense. The resulting collection of photographs could be noticeably less bland than those from film cameras. This is true of all digital cameras, of course, but with the 4.2 megapixel resolution, the pictures are worth taking. I use this camera for simple astro photography, and the manual focus arrangement is actually well suited to that purpose. The focusing inconvenience remains, but for astro work, focusing is always hard. The Casio has a bulb setting, allowing time exposures of any length, and that feature is great for imaging dim objects. In addition, there are a number of standard time exposures, the longest of which is 8 seconds. Pictures may be snapped remotely with an optional attachment, but the standard 10-second delay is adequate to damp out telescope vibrations from manual picture snapping. A noteworthy astro photo problem is that the camera requires light at power up, or it thinks its lens cap is on, and it won't cooperate. Thus, a flashlight comes in handy for power-up in the dark, but flashlights are frowned upon at star parties. In summary, the picture quality is unexpectedly good. The camera is complicated, and the operator must befriend it. Don't take it on a camping trip, because the technology is too delicate. Despite the Casio's foibles, most owners will likely learn to love it. I know I do.
Rating:
Summary: Paris via Casio
Review: Before my Paris trip, I took a few fotos to be sure I knew how to use the many knobs and buttons. I stayed with the Auto mode the whole trip. The colors were super quality and resolution much better than I expected. I took 5 64MB memories and three sets of batteries. I actually used only one set of batteries and 2 64MB memories for the whole trip. My only goofs were to accidently switch to multiple shot mode and fill up my memory. No problem, I just erased them and got my memory back One of the best things was the diopter correction dial for tbe view finder. I didn't need my glasses to see perfect views and check focus (The screen view panel is hard to see in bright sun light). (Another thing I need is the Macro Mode which lets me photo the microcircuit boards and the other little gadgets I design, at just a few inches away from the product}.
Now at home, I have so many fotos to play with. I use ixla software (I have used this before for digital photo editing) to do this and print the final result with an HP 1115 PhotoSmart printer.
My only sadness is to never need all the beautiful German lenses I collected over the years for my SLR camera (Exacta). This QV-4000 does it all!
I am really happy with my purchase, you will be too....
Rating: 
Summary: Neat Little Camera
Review: I am very impressed by this camera. Only a small technical glitch prevents me from giving it 5-stars. I could return it, but it doesn't seem worth the hassle. The features and photo quality are outstanding. I'm particularly impressed by the ability to set the white balance for artificial lighting conditions and to control exposure via a frequency histogram preview. The Canon optics are a feature that I trust and the image quality speaks for itself. The camera is a nice size although I wish it were a bit smaller. A 32Mb card came with the camera. I bought a 128 MB card to shoot uncompressed TIFFs at 10 MB each. The one problem I have is the control stick which navigates through menu options sometimes does not work in one direction and I have to go the reverse direction the long way through to the next item. For the price I paid, this is an outstanding value and I am blown away by it. And at full price it is still an excellent camera. I've used most of the Nikon digital cameras except the 5000 or better series and this one is superior. Who would ever have thought I'd buy a Casio?
Rating:
Summary: Very good camera
Review: I bought this camera a couple weeks before Christmas for $. I have shot hundreds of pictures and they are incredible!! I'm not a pro photographer, but I do alot of catalog photography for my business. The detail is very good and the features can do just about anything. Printed at 8x10 on a good inkjet you can't tell it is a digital print. Even at 11x14 it is very good. Same lens as the Canon G2, same CCD as the Sony 85. FOR HUNDREDS LESS! Just because it doesn't say Sony or Canon on the camera, don't let this one get away.
Rating:
Summary: Great picture quality
Review: I have been using this camera for a year and I'm very pleased with it. Pictures are great, it's easy to use but if you want to do more advanced setup, it's possible. The only dark side is that it takes about 3sec to turn the camera on.
Rating:
Summary: novice and semi-professionals take note
Review: I purchased the QV-4000 about a month ago. I've used it to take short video clips to send to family in other states... It's a great camera to have around...
The dial is a little hard to turn but, since I've accidentally turned it once or twice, it's good that it's hard to do. Second... Battery Life. I've only been able to get about 70 shots in 60 min with the original set of batteries. ...Now, for anyone concerned about a camera made by casio - don't be concerned. Sony makes the Optics from what I've heard. The camera is pretty good under most conditions. Interior light can be tricky if you forget that it has white balance control. The software is so simple to use... Hmmm... plug in camera. Hit "Okay" in window that pops up... wait a second or two... Then, an HTML page pops up with thumbnails on it. You can right click and then "send to email recipient"... It'll even ask if you want to send a smaller picture to cut down on email size... Great!
Quality of pictures... Well, they are absoblutely gorgeous! They are huge, too. I'd recomend that you get Photoshop to do any editing.. the included editor is kind of off the mark if you get what I mean. The 32 Meg card will hold about 20 pictures at high resolution or about 6 or so 30 second video clips. I've bought a 128M chip since they are so [inexpensive]... All in all, with the camera and the 32 Meg chip, it's the best set up you can get for the price! Good camera. Easy loading. Great Battery Life. Great pictures. Have fun.
Rating:
Summary: novice and semi-professionals take note
Review: I purchased the QV-4000 about a month ago. I've used it to take short video clips to send to family in other states... It's a great camera to have around...
The dial is a little hard to turn but, since I've accidentally turned it once or twice, it's good that it's hard to do. Second... Battery Life. I've only been able to get about 70 shots in 60 min with the original set of batteries. ...Now, for anyone concerned about a camera made by casio - don't be concerned. Sony makes the Optics from what I've heard. The camera is pretty good under most conditions. Interior light can be tricky if you forget that it has white balance control. The software is so simple to use... Hmmm... plug in camera. Hit "Okay" in window that pops up... wait a second or two... Then, an HTML page pops up with thumbnails on it. You can right click and then "send to email recipient"... It'll even ask if you want to send a smaller picture to cut down on email size... Great!
Quality of pictures... Well, they are absoblutely gorgeous! They are huge, too. I'd recomend that you get Photoshop to do any editing.. the included editor is kind of off the mark if you get what I mean. The 32 Meg card will hold about 20 pictures at high resolution or about 6 or so 30 second video clips. I've bought a 128M chip since they are so [inexpensive]... All in all, with the camera and the 32 Meg chip, it's the best set up you can get for the price! Good camera. Easy loading. Great Battery Life. Great pictures. Have fun.
Rating:
Summary: Excellent!!!
Review: I took my QV-4000 to Rome for 10 days and there was nothing it could not do for me. I wanted a camera small enough to be unobtrusive, yet powerful enough to offer me a myriad of options for picture taking. The automatic and manual options did not disappoint. The dark interiors of churches turned out light enough to see because I could manually set the aperture or speed to cover the situation. Yet when I wanted fast shots the auto features functioned well. I used the panorama mode often and even when handheld (not recommended) the results were excellent. Even 360 degrees in the Pantheon (handheld) was good enough to impress family and friends. Close-up, portraits, and scenics were easily managed by the Best Shot modes. I like the large capacity (I also purchased the IBM Microdrive) so that I could take as many pictures as I wanted without worrying about running out of storage space or downloading. (I had no access to a computer to do so.) And I could instantly view the shots and delete any that did not measure up. The only slight disappointment was the view screen was nearly impossible to see in the bright sunlight, but I could always use the viewfinder instead. All in all, an excellent choice and very dependable. I recommend it highly.
Rating:
Summary: Great picture quality
Review: I'm on my 4th digital camera. I read countless reviews of Canon G2, Nikons, Kodaks, and Sonys before I bought the Casio. I owned it for 5 months now. I am thrilled with every aspect: picture quality, lens, features, and speed of processing each photo. My criteria was: 1. AA batteries. This camera came with great rechargeables. Even in while traveling where I cannot easily recharge I can get replacements at any local store. 2. CompactFlash card. I had already invested in three for previous Kodak DC210 and DC290 cameras, all work great with this Casio camera. 3. I wanted a camera that is ready to shoot another shot in a couple of seconds. This one, even with 200 photos already on the memory card, does it every time. VERY fast timing. The DC290 took great shots but I often had to wait 20 or 30 sceconds between shots. 4. This camera has an external flash jack so I can use my existing studio flash outfit. 5. Photos taken in low light come out spectacular. 6. Canon lens is great and Sony sensor is spot on for colors. 7. Build quality has proven excellent. On the minus side: A. This camera, while still smaller than many, is a little brickish and larger than some may want. B. Flash range is only about 11-12 ft. Often need to take a flash photo then shut flash off and picture usually comes out better if there is ANY light available.
Rating:
Summary: QV-4000 is best yet
Review: I'm on my 4th digital camera. I read countless reviews of Canon G2, Nikons, Kodaks, and Sonys before I bought the Casio. I owned it for 5 months now. I am thrilled with every aspect: picture quality, lens, features, and speed of processing each photo. My criteria was: 1. AA batteries. This camera came with great rechargeables. Even in while traveling where I cannot easily recharge I can get replacements at any local store. 2. CompactFlash card. I had already invested in three for previous Kodak DC210 and DC290 cameras, all work great with this Casio camera. 3. I wanted a camera that is ready to shoot another shot in a couple of seconds. This one, even with 200 photos already on the memory card, does it every time. VERY fast timing. The DC290 took great shots but I often had to wait 20 or 30 sceconds between shots. 4. This camera has an external flash jack so I can use my existing studio flash outfit. 5. Photos taken in low light come out spectacular. 6. Canon lens is great and Sony sensor is spot on for colors. 7. Build quality has proven excellent. On the minus side: A. This camera, while still smaller than many, is a little brickish and larger than some may want. B. Flash range is only about 11-12 ft. Often need to take a flash photo then shut flash off and picture usually comes out better if there is ANY light available.
|
