Rating: 
Summary: Good Camcorder for the Money
Review: Like some of the other reviewers, I spent alot of time researching before I settled on this model. I based my purchase on what features it offered - I wanted my camcorder to be small, easy to use, digital, have firewire and USB capability, have a memory cart slot, and be able to take stills. The JVC fit the bill. I got a great deal and they even threw in a memory card and a tape.
The camera does have some very minor motor noise, but I don't think there is a camera out there that doesn't. Pretty much in every review I have read on various models someone complains about motor noise. The mike is fixed to the camera case and is very sensitive so noise happens.
The video quality is very good. I originally thought I would have to a DVD camcorder but this has more lines of resolution. With the light on the video drops in quality but this is explained in the manual and is expected.
I wish I could record video directly to the card. It would be nice to throw a 1G card in and be able to transfer it to my computer quickly. I think this was an oversight by JVC. The largest card it will take is 64mb which is plenty for the size of still it is capable of. The camera will accept cards larger than 64mb, but may not display the pictures properly if you want to view them.
The still picture quality isn't bad. It's actually pretty good compared to some stills I have seen from camcorders. Just keep the resolution and image size set to their highest settings. Why take pictures at low quality when you can fit hundreds at high quality on your card?
The optical zoom may not be as high as others, but it is plenty. I have not used the digital zoom so I cannot comment on it. I have been pleased with the amount of zoom I get without the digital zoom so I haven't needed it.
The camera is small, lightwieght and easy to hold. If you do buy one, I would reccomend a good sized case. Extra tapes, cables and adaptors quickly take up more space than the camera.
Rating: 
Summary: Improved performance. Best I found for the price.
Review: After researching online and trying out several brands and models, I chose the JVC GRD72. I purchased it at Costco for $400. Low light performance, the remote control, and analog input were the main reasons I purchased this camera and they all work very well. I have also found the 16x9 squeeze mode and LED light to work better than I expected. I have had no trouble capturing video on any computer via firewire. This camcorder does not take very good still photos, and provided software is only fair. You should look at another camcorder if these features are important to you. Overall the performance has been better than expected and I am very happy with the purchase.
Rating:
Summary: Cheapest place to buy it
Review: Forget buying this camcorder at a retail store!! I originally bought the GDG33 version (the next version below this one) at Walmart. I returned it because I found this version (GRD72) at www.buydig.com for $75 cheaper!!! The lesson is: Research over the internet to find the product you want, go to the retail stores to get a hands on look, then go back to the internet and search for the cheapest (and still reliable) store to purchase it. Do your research on the internet store to make sure it is a reputable company.
Rating:
Summary: Cheapest place to buy it
Review: Forget buying this camcorder at a retail store!! I originally bought the GDG33 version (the next version below this one) at Walmart. I returned it because I found this version (GRD72) at www.buydig.com for $75 cheaper!!! The lesson is: Research over the internet to find the product you want, go to the retail stores to get a hands on look, then go back to the internet and search for the cheapest (and still reliable) store to purchase it. Do your research on the internet store to make sure it is a reputable company.
Rating:
Summary: Good value for money spent
Review: From what I've read from some of the reviewers I might not have bought a JVC. Now I'm glad I did. Taking the time to learn the pros and cons of the various menu settings has allowed me to avoid all of the pitfalls they encountered, especially for low light shooting. If you shoot in electrically lit areas, do NOT use NightShot or Auto-A menu settings if the camera or a subject might move. Use the AGC setting. AutoFocus and Image Stabilization only work well in dim lighting using Auto mode, not Manual.
The color balance of the videos outdoors is slightly toward the "cool" end of the spectrum, but can be made perfect by doing a manual white balance (carry a pure white card to set it).
I have not encountered any unsurmountable problem yet. The only negatives so far (7 months of use) in addition to what I said above are: if you power on the camera and it is at a high zoom setting from last time, the autofocus has problems until you zoom out; the front LED light is of little use, it creates a keychain flashlight type of illumination, bright in the center and dim around the edges; the Wide Squeeze mode for 16:9 is ONLY good if you NEVER want to make a copy for a 4:3 TV.
Best points: Excellent color quality outdoors and acceptable indoors with reasonable illumination and manual white balance, small and easy to carry, battery charges quickly and it's life is ok as I don't use LCD much or leave camera ON between scenes; good optical zoom range but you might need a wide angle converter in cramped spaces; sound quality is adequate unless you're recording musical instruments and want precise accuracy.
Suggestions: Buy a 30.5-37mm step-up ring, a UV filter and a proper lens hood. It fits snugly in a Roots N5 bag (belt, hand, and shoulder straps), available at photo stores, leaving room for an extra tape (or two or extra small battery), the A/C adapter and a white balance card.
Rating: 
Summary: I took it back
Review: I got this camcorder and took it back within a day. My first few videos were okay, but they were just me shooting things around my house. That night I took it to a party, and the video turned out awful.
The problem was the autofocus. The picture would go in and out of focus even when the camera and the subject were not moving. Also, any change in lighting made it go out of focus. At one part, I filmed one of my friends talking on the couch. We were both sitting down and not moving, but the focus would get blurry periodically, sometimes for 30 seconds or more. The video was unwatchable; I was embarrassed I had spent so much money on it!
Also, the camera does not fair well when your subject is moving, even if in focus. It looks really choppy, more akin to the video I take with my digital *still* camera than with a real video camera. I have video of people walking in and out of the door and you can harldy see them, it looks horrible.
The video is fine when it is in focus and filming inanimate objects, so I gave it two stars, but when out of focus you can hardly tell what you're filming!
I used Amazon's service where you pay online and pick it up at Circuit City, and my exchange was very smooth; I got excellent customer service. I bought the Sony DCR-HC20 instead. The associate told me the autofocus problem was common in all JVC models. The Sony was highly recommended by him and my brother (who has taught film classes where all students were required to have a digital camcorder).
So far, so good. I will write a review of the Sony after I've had for a little longer, but the focus is much better than on the JVC. It has a much nicer feel than the JVC, when I first got it out of the box, the JVC looked very cheep in comparison. So far, all the video I've taken in low light has exceeded my expectations.
I've also heard that Canon is a good brand, although I don't have any personal experience with them. But I will never buy anything from JVC again.
One additional comment: The JVC uses a regular light attatched to the front instead of an infrared light for low-light filming. I thought the regular light would be better since the color is truer, but my friends told me it was uncomfortably bright, "brutal" was the exact word. With the infrared light on my other camera, I can take video in low light without blinding them. A video camera isn't any good if people don't want to be filmed!
----------------------
Edit: I just took my Sony out for the night. My boyfriend and I watched the video from last night (taken by the JVC) and the video from tonight (taken by the Sony), and the difference in quality is staggering! We can't beleive the JVC is still on the market. The JVC looks *almost* as good as the Sony when filming still objects under very bright lighting, but otherwise it is unwatchable compared to the Sony video.
Don't get this camera if you have friends or go out at night. Because of the lag in autofocus and slow frame rate, we described it as video that "looks like it's drunk." Unless you want the videos from your summer vacation or baby's first steps to look like they've had a few cocktails, don't buy this!
Rating:
Summary: Good overall MiniDV Camcorder
Review: I have had the JVC GR-D72US for 1 week now, and am very happy with the video quality in all lighting situations. Even in near-zero lighting situations where only light source was a window, quality was very good using the AGC Gain turned on. The camera adjusts fairly quickly in auto mode once powered up. If you are taping indoors, and move outdoors during a single shoot, the white balance may not catch up to current conditions.
I have found the camera to feel a little flimsy in your hand. The strap doesn't hold the camera in your palm very securely, even after adjusting the strap to circulation-stopping levels. The body of the camera is solid, with the exception of the tape load door found in the bottom, which wobbles slightly when fully closed.
The analog passthrough function works great. Produces excellent quality captures with very little quality loss from the original. Remember to remove the tape before you begin the capture, or your software will assume that it will need to play the contents of your tape, rather than true passthrough from the analog source.
Digital Still quality is marginal. I still have some work fiddling around with quality settings. But so far, the images where not acceptable. Great to have a separate SD card slot. Wish the camera had a SD-Only mode. Stills are captured to tape AND SD, or to tape.
Front LED is spot-light focused, and only lights up what is directly in front of the lens.
Like all camcorders, the digital image stabilization stops working after about 10x zoom, so have a tripod or mono-pod handy for long zooms. 16x zoom is great to have. Panasonic GV15 has a better 22x zoom capability. Focus seems to wander slightly in low-light situations at 16x zoom. Tip: Manual focus if you are going to sit at 16x zoom to stop "wandering". Image quality is excellent at 16x.
Buy yourself an extended life battery. I found one at keybattery.com for $17. Lasts for 2.5 hours.
Overall I found this camera to be a good solid purchase. It does everything I need. The small size of the camera allows me to carry both my Nikon 5700 and JVC in the same bag during trips.
Rating: 
Summary: Great Camera, poor audio recording
Review: I just got my camera, put in a tape and as I started filming I imediately noticed that the gears that move the tape are very noisy. I hoped that the microphone wasnt picking up this noise, but when I played back the tape, the noise was very apparent. The microphone is built into the camera and there is no plug to use an external microphone. I am going to get this camera replaced, hoping that the gear noise was an aberation unique to the camera I was sent. It is a good camera otherwise. On the bright side, it is perfect for making silent films.
Rating:
Summary: Best camcorder under $600
Review: I spent over 20 hours researching my recent camcorder purchase. The best site was camcorderinfo.com. In fact, they just posted a thorough review of the GRD72 and also have reviews of one model down (D33) and one model up (D93) from this one. Also be sure to check out the competing models' reviews (Sony and Canon). What I was looking for in a camcorder, was, surprise surprise (!) good video performance in a range of lighting conditions. I had read that low-light performance on ALL so-called consumer camcorders was very poor. The D72 (and D33) have the best low-light performance of ANY camcorder priced $600 or less! That's saying a ton considering these models sell for almost half of that! Seriously, check out the Sony HC20, 30, or 40 and the D72 beats them all! Plus it has decent still image capability, includes LED lights, and has analog-to-digital passthrough. Can't be beaten! What a deal! Super easy to use and great video - what more could you want? Some of the other reviews on amazon for the D72 seem bizarre and based only on the software that comes with the camera. You likely won't use the software that comes with ANY camcorder you buy. What do you want out of your camcorder? Good video performance, versatiliy, and ease of use are the only criteria that matter! Dig around on the Internet for reviews of other models to convince yourself, but if you take this reviewer's advice alone, you'll save yourself a dozen hours of work! :-)
Rating:
Summary: Cheap for the price
Review: I wanted a camcorder that has a large zoom and good low light performance, as I shoot wildlife. So far this camcorder seems to "check most of the boxes." I bought it at Costco for $349. For the money it's 5 stars, but in the larger schema there are a few improvements I might recommend. Some negatives-
->Nylon strap is narrow, contributing to a little instability in handholding; one has to form a "C" to cup the camcorder like a Big Mac to hold it steady (not a big deal).
->Manual focus is a bit awkward, I still prefer the ring. Man focus is useful while crouched in the bush and you don't want the auto-focus to zero in on the blade of grass 2 feet in front of you, instead of the elk 30 feet away. Simple solution: Set to manual control, focus on distant object and press manual focus button.
->Zoom action lever is small, so one must concentrate to do a smooth zoom. But true of many camcorders.
-> I wish the finder tilted up - it only goes straight back. Positives- Software install went off with out issues. I believe some of other folks' issues is due to other issues on their pc's.* ->scenalyzer captured all the video perfectly on the timecode breaks.
->Video quality is quite good, in fact excellent (YES!!) for such a cheap camcorder. Low light performs far better than expected, My old Sony lost all the chroma at low light levels, while the color on this JVC is not vivid, it is far better than most in low light. ...and that's without their niteshot. Daytime quality is fantastic. I can't believe I am getting this quality for this price, actually.
->The gentleman who mentioned the mic picking up noise from the mechanics, I did not hear this. I hope his replacement unit is ok for him.
-> Macro (extreme closeup) is very good.
-> Has just about all the key features one could want to shoot decent video. Manual exposure controls, Iris lock, White balance (limited, but good enough). Like a good set of golf clubs, the limitation is usually in the operator, not the tool. Some General TIPS:
->The CCD image sensors in a digicam and a camcorder are completely different, so don't expect ANY camcorder to shoot stills well. Maybe someday, but there's a long way to go.
-> Digital zoom is worthless. Ignore it. Turn it off.
->Tape is cheap, always record at fastest speed (SP)
->Don't expect to get DV out of USB. USB on most all camcorders is simply to dump out "low-res" still and MPEG files from the camcorder. These are really only good enough for streaming to the web, or e-mailing to those on dial-up. To do it right, you need firewire to get DV ot of the camcorder. Additionally, Tip: Consider http://www.scenalyzer.com/ for their capture program. It does analog and digital capture very well and is pretty cheap ($40). One thing i love is the stop motion video capability it offers. *Don't underestimate how important is is to have the latest drivers (esp. video card drivers) on your pc before doing such an intensive task as video editing. As an experienced network manager, much of the PC problems I see are due to an excessive amount of garbage software and outdated drivers (and BIOS) on the typical PC.
For video editing, I have a partition on my PC running Windows 2000 and my video editing (Premiere) and related software ONLY. No games or other crap to gum things up. (That's on a separate install of Windows) You cannot expect to be able to install all that software available out there and still have it work correctly. Your PC MUST deliver about 3.6Meg of data per second to the CPU to have smooth video. 720x480 DV consumes 13.6Gig PER HOUR of your hard disk. Rendering sucks CPU cycles, unless you have a hardware card to offload this process to. You will also need a fair amount of freespace to render and do other tasks. I believe it a disservice for others to state they had issues w/ this software w/o checking to ensure their own house was in order first. Summary: Excellent value for the money. Thanks JVC!!
|
