Rating: 
Summary: A Poor Excuse For A Sequel!
Review: Why would Universal have given the "OK" on this film? It was bad! Steven Spielberg didn't direct or write. He produced it, but I imagine he was so busy with "A.I." that he didn't realize how bad this movie would turn out. Conned into visiting site B, Alan Grant leads a search party for a couple in the midst of a divorce's son. They discover not only that the dinosaurs are thriving on the island, but they are evolving. They can now communicate! The story is pretty lame! The original film should have been left alone! I'm not saying its the worst waste of your money. I wasn't sorry I saw it, but I wish that they had come up with a better storyline!
Rating: 
Summary: actually quite good
Review: this was a good film. i liked it. i liked the short quick action involved and it was also funny. that's more of what this kind of sequel needs. when they make jurassic park IV, they better use this method of filmmaking, and not make some huge plot and long film...it will wear us out.
Rating:
Summary: Dinos=Good / Plot = Bad
Review: Ok, I was expecting to go into JP3 that they would totally destroy the plot and story, but I was surprised because the story was only secondary. If you really liked JP3 you went to see the Dinosaurs destroy another group of brain-less humans. But if you went expecting the suspense and thrill of the original, you will be sadly disappointed because the movie moves at such a fast pace an involved plot is nearly impossible.I would say that if you keep an open mind and want a good Dinosaurs-eating-humans movie this would be my first recomendation.
Rating:
Summary: You will like it if you like special effects
Review: Plot is very basic and predictable as other Jurassic Park movies, however graphics gets better although there are some room for improvement. I think Jurassic Park IV will be better :)
Rating:
Summary: This is a great action film !
Review: Okay so it's not Speilberg but Joe Johnston does a great job !
Well Alan Grant is offered to go on a aireal tour of Isla Sorna and so they actually want to go find their son Eric and so they crash land [of course] but encounter a lot new dinosaurs that havn't been in the first or second . So really recommend this movie to people who liked the first two
and if they like action so go see it somewhere or sometime . I really loved this movie a lot !
Rating: 
Summary: The best movie of the year!
Review: Jurassic Park 3 is the coolest, most action-packed movie that I have seen all year. It's smart, funny, scary, suspenseful, and it doesn't let up. I don't think it is as good as the Jurassic Park, but I do think it is as good as The Lost World, which by the way I loved. Sam Neil's return was great, and William H. Macy was a perfect choice to replace Ian Malcolm's comic releif part of the film. The dinos are too cool. Move T-Rex the Spinosaurus has taken your throne out from underneath you in a very violent cou. The Pteranodon sequence was one of the best bits in the series. The raptors weren't as good this time round, but I liked seeing a new perspective on them. I know what you are thinking, I'm some dumb teen who only likes movies that are so fast they have nothing to redeam themselves. However, bye this movie anyway, no matter what upsets the series has caused to you before. It rocks.
Rating:
Summary: Jurassic park 3 rocks!!!!!!!
Review: This movie is jam packed with action big time !!!
If you havn't seen this movie you have to ! This movie is better than the others .
But you don't have to take my opinion and see it and hate it !!!!!
I'm saying that I like this movie so when it comes to DVD rent it first and see if you like it and if you do please buy it !
It's one of the greatest films that i've ever seen so see ya later !!!
Rating:
Summary: Jurassic Park 3 is the best movie of the 2001 year
Review: Jurassic Park 3 is the best movie I saw in the past few years and the dinosaurus were really real and the action in the movie never gave up it was scary and really cool action parts and sam neill was a surprise to see him back. the water part of the movie with the spinosaurus was the my favorite part of the movie.
Rating:
Summary: great
Review: i love the way that the brought back the guy from the first movie he is the one that made it jurrasic park and the way that they set it up for another movie was just excelent.
Rating: 
Summary: This movie wreaked
Review: Since the original "Jurassic Park", each following sequel has lacked something. The problems with "The Lost World" were basically just with the rather cliche' plot (although I rather enjoyed the ending, being a classic Godzilla movie fan) and practically no character development. With "Jurassic park III", the problems lie with practically EVERY aspect of this film. First off, there was no novel to take the story from, and it shows by there being no plot to this film whatsoever -- oh sure, the first few minutes of the movie give us indications that there could be a plot, albeit a rather weak one, however, the story just goes down-hill from there. Second, what bothers me is that the special effects for this film have severely reduced in quality; dinosaurs that looked completely real in the first two films suddenly appear to be computer generated in this one. Shouldn't technology be heading in the other direction? One good aspect of this film was the return of Sam Neil to reprise his role from the original film, and he does make a strong attempt to bring some dignity back to this sorry little picture, however in the end it's all a waste, for this film manages to do nothing more than embarass the two previous installments.
| 
