Rating: 
Summary: This action is fresh and great!
Review: i loved the new action and dinosaurs they were great, i also loved the stars in this movie. The plot was pretty good, but without the action it was nothing! The action brought the ok plot from a B to a A. The sarcastic jokes are fresh and good aswell. This is a must see movie and it was way better than i expected! So go see this movie!
Rating: 
Summary: Eye-popping eye-candy
Review: All right, so the script isn't eclectic, and the storyline isn't exactly unpredictable. Nobody goes to see a Jurassic Park movie for those elements -- face it, everyone wants to see the DINOSAURS. And if this movie does anything well, it's in the dino-delivery. The dinosaurs are bigger and smarter -- and, surprisingly, apparently less hungry. Out of all the Jurassic films, fewer people get chomped in this one (perhaps that's because there are fewer main characters?). Still, the script manages to convey a dark humour, and there are a few witty wisecracks.The cinematography is fantastic, and the special effects engrossing. A few shots, like the one with the embryos in the 'production room', are simply ethereal. All in all, while it's certainly no brain-bending piece of thoughtful rhetoric, JPark III delivers well what we want most: MORE DINOSAURS! Go to see it -- it's way better than THE LOST WORLD.
Rating:
Summary: New Twist
Review: First of all I think it wasn't quite as good as the first but came very close. It was a movie to see again and again and it will never get old. I didn't like the second one as much as the first so the third one is way better. For litter kids I think it's not scarry at all. It's really funny and hillarous. I think they are going to make a fourth and fifth movie considering the fact that there are 5 different islands. Look for my reviews in those.
Rating: 
Summary: dissapointed...
Review: Jurassic Park 3 wasn't really my cup of tea. The film starts out slow and honestly, I thought the entire film was rather slow-moving. I was most surprised that they didn't show more dinosaurs. In all the dino's probably only had 10 min. of screen time, whereas the first the dino's were practically in every frame of film. This film is more character oriented than the first two. I just don't know about this movie...it was actually pretty boring, with the "surprises" few and far between. I think that a Jurassic Park 4 would be a big mistake - why not just re-release the original Jurassic Park? People tend to like that one best...
Rating:
Summary: not as good as the orginal
Review: Let me think JP3 is alright. But it didn't really have much plot to it all it was was running away from dinos and getting killed . The dino effects were awsome but just the story fadded in 30 minutes of the film. But JP3 was a whole lot much much better than "The lost world" thats for sure. nothing can beat Jurassic Park one of the best films directed by "The talented Spilberg" Note: I sure hope I spelled his last name right!
Rating: 
Summary: Very Bad!
Review: I didn't expect much from the third installment of the series, especially with how good the first one was. Even so, JP3 was a bid bust. In the first movie, you really felt for the characters, but in this one, I think I was hoping that the dinos would get them all. In once scene, Grant says that their is "nothing in heaven or earth." that would get him to go back to the island, but not 5 minutes later he's on his way. I'm not going to give away any of the "plot" but be assured that you'll leave scratching your head. This movie should not have been made. If the was no good story to tell, then they should have let the Jurrasic Park series die without it being tainted with this!
Rating:
Summary: Jurassic Park 3 takes a bite out of the Box Office
Review: Jurassic Park 3 was different from the other Jurassic Park movies. Jurassic Park 3 had humor, love, and dinosaurs (of course). It didn't need to be longer, or shorter, it didn't more blood, or death, or anything like that, it was a great movie just as it is. If you haven't seen it yet you need to go see it now.
Rating:
Summary: JP3 - The Apology
Review: I felt that this sequel was an apology for The Lost World. Michael Crichton wrote an unbelievably great sequel to Jurassic Park, Spielberg took it, slapped Crichton in the face with it, and then threw it away. C'mon . . . the last scenes of JP2 were possibly the cheesy I have ever seen (the Godzilla comparison with Japanese running down the street yelling stuff, the T-Rex loose in San Diego) Nevertheless, I liked JP3. It was a return to the thrill-ride intensity of JP1. Maybe it was having Sam Neill back that made it better. The special effects were, once again, great. The jungle fight between the T-Rex and the new monster, spinosaurus, were too real-looking to think they were computer-generated. Sam Winston, once again, did a superb job with the velociraptors. The story line was admirable but left a few holes. I was shocked that the movie was so short. However, it was a pleasant length. Although, it was funny walking out hearing a fellow movie goer ask if it was intermission. I don't understand why this movie was rated PG-13 unless it was for violence and scary intensity. There were very few profanities that I can recall. And, I don't like the evolutionary message it sent - I am a Creationist. (Please, velociraptors would never have taken over the world. They didn't the first time.) However, I have come to accept that Hollywood will never embrace Scripture, no matter how true it is. All in all, I recommend this movie. It was a great rollercoaster ride reminiscent of the first one.
Rating: 
Summary: Re-cycling hit the Movies!
Review: Jurassic Park III is visually stunning and short enough to be fun, but when you peel the new and improved effects away, it's the first movie, repackaged. Let's stop the sequels here, before our luck runs out.
Rating:
Summary: WHAT HAPPENED TOO THE LUSTER?OR OH -AH BEEN THERE DONE THAT.
Review: Well this movie gets a weak3 star-lacking the elements of the first two & more moans then cheers from the people leaving the show.Leaves one too hope they don't continue the series,in4yrs.Although I am there if they do & will see this again before it leaves the box office.But with out Steve & Mike behind the wheel:There was too much of a been there done that feel.The new spinosaur was just something too move the movie along-it lacked the WOW!COOL!That most fans felt when the t-rex was introduced in 1.There this fight between the new kid on the block and old rex.Welp it was not that impressive-unversal should have consulted Toho for dino fight corography,Raptors lacked screen time-then again squeezing it all into a 92minute movie whould acount for that.If your a big fan of the first two be prepared for a let down. In a nut shell Alan Grant is cond into going back too the Jurrassic Islands,bye a small time bussiness man,Pretending too be a big timer.It's a repeat of one. The mission to save a lost son.who was parasailing with his uncle over the island two months earler.But this rich pretender-tells grant it for an aireal tour.The plain crash on the island.andalong comes the new resident too crush there escape craft.Grant is mroedetremined too get away then find the kid.who he happens too bump into in achase sequence. They group finds a boat and is lead too rather silly chopy ending. Aside from Sam-the others are abunch of nobodies who will most likely stay that way if this was tere best acting job.
| 
