Rating: 
Summary: Better Than I Expected
Review: 'The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers' is a movie I thought would be good or possibly average when I saw the first preview of it. But I was totally wrong. I thought 'The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers' was a brilliant movie when I saw it in theaters! In fact it was even better than its great prequel 'The Fellowship of the Ring'. The action, adventure, musical (score), acting, and drama 'The Two Towers' had to offer was incredible! Both 'Fellowship of the Ring' and 'Two Towers' went buy 'The Lord of the Rings' book trilogy very well even though there were some parts that HAD to be added, cut, or changed. So far 'The Lord of the Rings' movie trilogy is going by very well! I can't wait to see 'Lord of the Rings: Return of the King' which I'm sure will be a great adaptation of 'The Lord of the Rings' book trilogy like its two prequels are. For now I must torturingly wait for 'The Two Towers' DVD to be released in stores.
Rating:
Summary: A Truly Magnificent Movie!
Review: 'The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers' is a movie that I WILL buy for DVD. It is such a brilliant movie because of the great acting, visual effects, and action/adventure. 'The Two Towers' is a wonderful adaptation of J.R.R. Tolkiens 'Lord of the Rings' book trilogy. 'The Fellowship of the Ring its prequel was fantastic! But 'The Two Towers' is even better! 'The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers' is the best movie of 2002.
Rating:
Summary: Excellent, Excellent, Excellent
Review: The movie, which we have all probably seen by now, is of course fabulous. Again a suplement to, instead of a remake of the book. Visually stunning and constantly engaging.
Rating:
Summary: Unsurpassed adventure.
Review: If Peter Jackson had tried to set the events leading up to RoTK any better he would not have succeeded. As sequels go, The Two Towers, save The Empire Strikes Back, is the finest example of "follow me I have something incredible to show you" filmaking I have ever seen. While much darker and more violent than FoTR, The Two Towers still carries great emotional weight, and stuns the viewer with intricate battle sequences interspersed with genuinely heart-felt and touching moments. Everything about this film screams quality. The performances are outstanding, and with the addition of Miranda Otto and Bernard Hill, the Middle Earth family is complete. The opening sequence is breathtaking. The battle for Helm's Deep is absolutely astonishing (eventhough the purists rail at the idea of Haldir coming to the rescue). The Ents march on Isengard is something that will be remembered for years to come. The mounting tension as Frodo and Sam race to destroy the ring grows with each passing second. Frodo's inner turmoil is superbly protrayed by the more than capable Elijah Wood. Aragorn is becoming King, with each passing second, and Peter Jackson is sharp enough to make it hard to notice. Everything about this movie just feels right. But Gollum steals the show. Andy Serkis is incredible, and he breathes so much life into the CG character that you quickly forget that Gollum is not actually a real person. All in all The Two Towers surpasses the Fellowship of the Ring, in almost every aspect. This viewer cannot fathom the wonders that Peter Jackson has in store us in The Return of the King. HIGHLY recommended.
Rating:
Summary: The Name of Both Film and Book
Review: This film does live up to the expectations I had of it. I knew that I could not expect every little detail from the book, and that this film, just like the Fellowship of the Ring, would become an instant favorite of mine. There are points in the film that I frowned at, such as the scene with Aragorn falling over the cliff, but I know that changes had to be made to adapt such a long book into a film. I also understand the fact that this movie as well as the other two have been and will be made for the masses, not just for us Tolkien enthusiasts. You can't expect everything from the book, Peter Jackson gave this film his maximum effort, I'm sure. And when such a page-to-film adaptation occurs, I know that dropping things from the original text has to be hard, but it is how things work. As for effects and the filming itself, It is superb. The landscapes and beauty of New Zealand jump from the screen, and describe Tolkien's world of Middle-earth as good as his linguistics allow. No better could they have done for this film, then they did, and I expect an even better film for The Return of the King. I recommend this book, film, and any other Tolkien-related item to anyone who has the time enough to learn and love his beloved Middle-earth. To close, I would like to add that Tolkien himself is the greatest author of all time, and anyone who says otherwise is either wrong, or nearly right.
Rating:
Summary: Amazing film
Review: .... OK, I have given this film 5 stars. Why? Is it the best film ever? Probably not. Is it flawed? There are a few flaws here and there (as in every film - look at the number of flubs in Jurassic Park...) but they do not really distract from the whole experience. I have given this flick 5 stars because I was thoroughly thrilled by it, from the riveting beginning to the cliffhanging end. Loosen up, people! After all, it is only an interpretation of a fantasy novel. There is nothing sacred to Tolkien's texts, it is only a fantasy. And a very good one at that. I have read it many, many times in a couple of languages. I am sure this qualifies me as a geek, but I still think that Peter Jackson and his crew have done a more than commendable job, to put it mildly. Especially the second tome is a nightmare to adapt into a screenplay and a watchable movie. This movie is more than watchable, it is an action packed fantasy that is simply a marvel to behold. The production is so richly detailed that there is always something new to see. Sure, there are deviations from the original story, but all in all I think Peter Jackson c.s. have done their utmost to respect the spirit and feel of Tolkien's works. I will certainly buy both the theatrical and the extended edition, and I have high hopes for a super-duper edition where every film lasts six hours or more. Well done, you wizards in New Zealand! Should you ever come across these humble lines: It has been a joy so far, and I am looking forward to the next and, sadly, last film. Personal note to Mr. Peter Jackson: If anybody can do 'The Hobbit', it is you. Please think about it. Cheers!
Rating:
Summary: A Great Movie!
Review: "The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers" is a great movie! It is even better than its spectacular prequel "The Fellowship of the Ring". The action is very intense in this movie. And the adventure, drama, romance, and fantasy is incredible! "The Two Towers" is a great movie that I highly recommend you buy when its released for DVD in stores. Oh! And I must say that this movie is a wonderful adaptation of the author J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings" book trilogy. "The Two Towers" goes by the book trilogy, which I have read, very well even though there were a few changes that HAD to be made.
Rating:
Summary: One of the greatest pieces of art I have ever seen!
Review: I have seen many things in the past and by far, I belive this will become a classic... scracth that; it already is! This wonderful fantasay epic goes to the lands of Middle Earth and tells how The One Ring was destroyed. This is the second installment in a triligoy and the third is yet to arrive in December. I can't wait! I really loved this movie, and if anyone else doesn't, you seriously have problems.
Rating:
Summary: Purist?
Review: Before these films were released, I thought perhaps I was a "purist", but now I realize I am not after all. I have read the Lord of the Rings books many, many times--the first time being over 30 years ago. I loved them then, and I love them today. But the films are not the books. That does not lessen my enthusiasm for either. As other reviewers have said--it's not possible in 9 hours to capture the complexity of the Rings trilogy. I was initially distressed at the change that placed the elves at Helm's Deep, but considering that in the books the struggle of the elves and dwarves [and Men] within their own lands was barely a footnote, I suppose that the screenwriter wished to show that they were not really on the sidelines and the most expedient way to include them and to illustrate that was to have Elves march to the aid of the members of the Company. [NOTE: for those who may have forgotten--silmultaneous with the battles and conflicts in the South which involved the Company {which Tolkien chose to describe in detail in these books}, the Dwarves and Lake Men in the North were also fighting for their lives and lands against hordes of orcs and goblins--as well as Legolas' father and their people in Mirkwood--AND the Elves of Lothlorien. In the books, the elves were not able to send help because they were besieged and I disagree with the reviewer who believed that Tolkien intended the reader to think that the elves chose to remain on the sidelines and let the chips fall where they may.] Anyway, as for the changes--it is sometimes nice to have a surprise or two and not have every aspect of the plot memorized before hand. I sincerely believe the Two Towers beautifully follows the Fellowship and I don't think that even "purists" could possibly craft a more compelling adaptation, or create a more enchanting set, or cast more empathetic actors. The films are magnificent. In their own right.
Rating:
Summary: One of the biggest epics to ever hit the cinemas
Review: Having just seen The Two Towers for a third time, I know that is one of the best of 2002 and one of the best so far of this decade. The first film seemed so unbeatable in terms of effects and adventure, but this takes it to the next level. There were some liberties taken with the book, but they don't hurt the story too much. I actually thought the elves fighting at Helm's Deep showed how noble they can be. It improves the audience's view of them. Even though all three films were shot together, all of the actors seem to be much more comfortable in their roles. This really seems to be Aragorn's film. That's not a bad thing as Viggo's Mortenson's performance is excellent. Gollum also takes centerstage as one of the most pitiful characters to hit the screen. He was portrayed well by Andy Serkis. Elijah Wood does an excellent job as Frodo. He's not the same hobbit he was in Fellowship, now he's beginning to understand the power of the ring and the pain it causes. Sean Astin gives a very innocent performance as Frodo's faithful companion, Sam. He also deliver one of the touching lines in the movie. Of the three story lines followed in this part of the mythical tale, the interaction of Pippin and Mary with Treebeard was my favorite. I was worried that the ents might appear silly but instead they come off as very wise vand calm creatures. As good as the theatrical version is I'm sure the extended version will improve upon it. With 43 extra minutes the epic will be even more monumental.
|
