Home :: DVD :: Science Fiction & Fantasy :: Fantasy  

Alien Invasion
Aliens
Animation
Classic Sci-Fi
Comedy
Cult Classics
Fantasy

Futuristic
General
Kids & Family
Monsters & Mutants
Robots & Androids
Sci-Fi Action
Series & Sequels
Space Adventure
Star Trek
Television
The Lord of the Rings - The Fellowship of the Ring (Widescreen Edition)

The Lord of the Rings - The Fellowship of the Ring (Widescreen Edition)

List Price: $29.95
Your Price: $22.46
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 .. 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 .. 339 >>

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: FANTASTIC MOVIE MAKING!!
Review: i'd forgotten that film was an art form, especially since hollywood churns out so much brainless garbage; however, THIS is no lame excuse for a movie... everything is immaculately conceived, produced, presented, and edited. the artistry of the set/costume/prop designers is overwhelming. the attention to deatil is enriching, and the cast do marvelous work with a fabulous epic. the movie doesn't follow the book perfectly, but i actually thought the revisions made the story more not less clear. the books can drone on and on, so it was awesome to get a feel for the emotion and excitement -- perhaps because we live in such a visually centered culture, but i needed to SEE the story to finally fall into it. this move is amazing -- an event actually! anyone who can't see that this is a wonderful movie is either looking at it from a perspective that i simply can't understand or WAY too picky. tell the tolkein heads that give this less than 5 stars to do better than this if they think they can. an instant classic

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: taste the magic of rivendell and lothlorien
Review: spectacular.sets,sfx and animation,a script barely changed from the book (mainly to manage to keep in down to 3 hrs.),are all superior. the casting is inspired,those people ARE the nine of the fellowship.throw in Christpher Lee as Saruman! and Liv Tyler as Arwen (in spite of various complaints i've read about her expanded role,i wanted to see more,she is a MAJOR character,just doesnt get as much text,the love story of Aragorn and Arwen is veiled,but a joy in the books),puts it way over the top.a historic event.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: One of the best movies I've ever seen
Review: This has got to be one of the best, if not the best movie I've ever. I just recently finished reading the 1st book ok the LOTR trilogy and I couldn't wait to see the movie. Of course they cut a few scenes out and changed stuff a little, but overall they kept very well to the storyline and the CG effects were incredible. I'm definitely going to see it again and reccomend it to everyone.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: The best movie ever
Review: This was one of the best movies i've ever seen

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Faithful, But Not To A Fault.
Review: One critique of that other movie (which I nevertheless quite enjoyed!) was that it was faithful to its source material to a degree that eliminated the opening for a director's touch; in so doing, some asserted, the real potential was missed for bold creativity and a stirringly beautiful film.

The Lord of the Rings is different perhaps because here we see someone who was faithful...but also creative. Doubtless this will cost him something with some constituents. He does take license; but he does so atop a faithful and loving recreation of the whole world and story of The Lord of the Rings. Mr. Jackson's reported habit of re-reading each chapter just before shooting it was a microcosm of his whole approach to the film: othe film was telling a bit of human history, not a some wild fantasy. This history was, perhaps, a bit more fantastical than the usual. As such the story is told much like Homer might tell it, and the audience is left to sort between historical fact, legend, and pure mythologies.

There are facets of the way the story was either interpreted or altered to accomodate film that will displease you. Some did me. Nevertheless, I think it more important to say that the film was beautiful, faithful to the heart of the story and nearly all of its facts. Every once in a while it is worth giving something our unrestrained and enthusiastic praise. I believe many will feel in viewing it as I did: that we are lucky to be drawn into such a story, one told so stirringly. We are given feasts for the senses, the heart, and the mind. Part of the film's beauty is in just how bad the bad folks are, just how good some of the good creatures are - and just how conflicted many of the characters are. Beauty is also in the sincerity of the performances, without which the entire thing falls to shreds. Beauty also flows from the images themselves - their qualities and their natures. The faces were extraordinary, the land was near-magical, and the special effects were dazzling, without intruding into the story hardly at all.

In this film the depth of character, relationship, story, and exploration of archetypal themes are combined with an amazing breadth of scope, scale, and theatre. I will see this film again in the theatres before I purchase the DVD - something I have not done in many years.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: A Ringer!
Review: After reading the epic several times, I awaited with anticipation and dread for the opening of the Lord of the Rings-Fellowship of the Ring. The dread was unnecessary and the anticipation only added to the pleasure of watching Jackson's adaptation of the novel. Five stars are merited for the fine performances of all the actors and actresses. Special effects, musical score, and glorious scenery of New Zealand make this one of the best epic flics of any year. Heartily recommend everyone see it for themselves on the biggest screen available to them.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: The movie left me begging for more
Review: I swear when i read the book i pictured everything smaller. The troll, the Balrog, even the Shire. I don't know what it is but this movie was a giant masterpiece. The movie went above and beyond set design, characterization, (with the exception of Aragorn, yea definately not jacked enough to be a ranger)and although I am not a fan of excessive "cgi" I enjoyed it in this film. The omitition of Tom Bombadil and the Barrow -Whight scene saddened me, and I can't say I liked Arwen's spontanous emergence in the plot, but hey, I guess you gotta please the other half of the audience, which also saddens me. I can't say I liked seeing Sauron in the flesh.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: Excellent!
Review: The first film in Peter Jackson's trilogy that brings the books to life was more than I expected. Most adaptations of classic and epic books tend to dissapoint. With all the hype surrounding the Fellowship of the Ring, I was sure to be let down. However, to my surprise, the film is as good of an adaptation as you could probably get. The special effects are amazing, the acting pretty good, and the film sticks to the book fairly well. The film is 3 hours long though, and does become a bit tedious to watch towards the end. All in all, it is an adaptation that works. Whether you are a fan of the books or not, this one is worth seeing. Especially while still on the big screen. And unlike recent blockbuster attempts such as Pearl Harbor, this is one blockbuster that doesn't have too much of a "cheesy-Hollywood-blockbuster" feel to it. I definately reccomend this one.

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: A cinematic triumph
Review: Fellowship of the Ring is a triumph. It is a work of passion and emotion. Peter Jackson demonstrates not only a passionate commitment to Tolkien's world but, more importantly, a cinematic vision of his own (as well as the technical skill to realize it). However, it must be said that it's only predictable that many Tolkien fanatics will complain about streamlining. But most of us -- both aficionados who aren't blinded and uninitiated viewers who aren't jaded -- will find it glorious entertainment -- long but never dull, filled with plot but surprisingly clear, and even at some points quite moving. The CGI are awesome -- almost flawless. The acting was very, very good. But it was a very good cast: McKellen's Gandalf is good-humored strength incarnate. Wood's Frodo is the wide-eyed innocent who is indeed not like his dear relative Bilbo. Viggo Mortensen is wicked with a sword, and I loved his underplayed, unpretentious air. Sean Astin's self-sacrificing Sam is perfect, Orlando Bloom's Legolas is deadly elegance. The more tightly wrapped snobs out there who despise Tolkien see the warm response to "Fellowship" as decadence incarnate, but the fact is, people are not only responding to the awesome setting of Middle Earth, but to Jackson's interpretation of Tolkien's themes which have endured for nearly half a century: we are emphatically and graphically reminded of the enormous power of evil, how it takes many forms and can never be totally destroyed. Lord of the Rings is a fable that echos the myths of Western history and its moral backbone warns of the misuse of power, which in todays "war against terrorism", resonates an important urgency.....

Rating: 5 stars
Summary: Lord Of The Rings- An Epic Masterpiece!!!
Review: Words cannot not explain how incredible this fantasy movie is. Im a big horor/thriller/gory movie buff and I wasnt really lookin forward to seeing this movie and at the theatre my eyes never left the screen and when the movie ended I would be counting down the days for the next movie! this movie combines fantasy/action/and thriller into one 3 hour masterpiece and without a doubt this is one of the greatest movies of all time and boy! I cant wait till next December! PS. 5 stars all the way...no other choice!


<< 1 .. 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 .. 339 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates