Home :: DVD :: Science Fiction & Fantasy :: Fantasy  

Alien Invasion
Aliens
Animation
Classic Sci-Fi
Comedy
Cult Classics
Fantasy

Futuristic
General
Kids & Family
Monsters & Mutants
Robots & Androids
Sci-Fi Action
Series & Sequels
Space Adventure
Star Trek
Television
The Adventures of Pinocchio

The Adventures of Pinocchio

List Price: $9.97
Your Price: $9.97
Product Info Reviews

<< 1 >>

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: Wonderful movie as seen on HBO!
Review: I remember this movie from when I was little. It was on HBO and was actually a t.v series afterward. It is not as bad as other people say. I like it as a kid and I think other children too will like it. Mind you it is an 80's style.

Rating: 4 stars
Summary: adventures of Pinocchio
Review: I thought this was a good adaptation and had some interesting music and some different passages. Its not as good as the original but it's $20 less.

Rating: 1 stars
Summary: The Wrong Wooden Boy
Review: This Pinocchio, from 1984, is possibly the worst remake in movie history. The original, 1940, Disney Pinocchio, was one of the greatest movies ever made, with Oscar-winning music and songs by Leigh Harline, Paul Smith and Ned Washington; an alternately scary and hilarious story; vivid characters; striking animation; and gifted voice performers. By contrast, this Japanese-American version has a limp screenplay; forgettable characters; lousy voice acting; and animation that wouldn't pass muster for the cheesiest, PBS TV cartoon show. That IMDB doesn't list the names of any of the voice performers, may be a blessing for their careers. Get the original Pinocchio, and avoid this one like a bad street.

Now to the problem: Disney has inexplicably discontinued the original Pinocchio. Thus, the only way to view it is via expensive used copies on sale through Amazon ($36-45), or through renting it from a video outlet. I hope that the geniuses at Disney aren't preparing to loose a politically correct replacement on the world. Hopefully, they have a deluxe DVD in the works. Prayers may be called for.

Originally published in The Critical Critic, November 8, 2003.


<< 1 >>

© 2004, ReviewFocus or its affiliates