<< 1 >>
Rating: 
Summary: Pornos have better production values....
Review: even homemade ones. I knew this was a bad movie, I didn't mind that. But the whole production makes this unwatchable. For instance, the whole opening scene on the lake looks like it was lit with a match. You cannot make out anything because it's so dark. Just because something is shot at night doesn't mean you don't light the scene!Even if you like bad z horror movies, I say stay clear of this one. Buy something like Zombie Bloodbath or Children of the Living Dead. Those movies are horrible as well, but at least you can see what's going on.
Rating:
Summary: Pornos have better production values....
Review: even homemade ones. I knew this was a bad movie, I didn't mind that. But the whole production makes this unwatchable. For instance, the whole opening scene on the lake looks like it was lit with a match. You cannot make out anything because it's so dark. Just because something is shot at night doesn't mean you don't light the scene! Even if you like bad z horror movies, I say stay clear of this one. Buy something like Zombie Bloodbath or Children of the Living Dead. Those movies are horrible as well, but at least you can see what's going on.
Rating:
Summary: Doc OF Z Movies
Review: First off this movie sucks I read the review above from amazon and it is complete S#!T there is very little blood and guts and very little nudity.Dont by this movie it was made by a dirt farming, gator restling redneck in some swamp out in the middle of nowhere. and the camera work is so bad you will end up burning this peace of crap before the movie ends.Dont By On Pain Of Death.!!!
Take your hard earned $13.46 and by a pizza its far more enjoyable.
Rating: 
Summary: Let Down
Review: Normally I am a big fan of cheap, cheesy 1970s horror films, especially if they take place in swamps and star aging has-beens. So you'd think I'd love this film. Nope. For one thing it is too self-conscious: it actually TRIES to be funny but isn't. For another thing, whatever redeeming qualities the first half of the film may have, by the time you get to the second half it is so repetitious that it become extremely plodding. And there is no payoff at the ending because THE FILM HAS NO ENDING! Somehow Ray forgot to give the film either any sense of resolution or some sort of shock. I'd settle for even for a poorly done shock. But no, the film just ends when it could have similarly ended after the first 25 minutes.
Even worse, the prologue Ray added to the beginning of the movie some time after he finished filming and everyone had gone home manages to make the non-ending even more of a non-ending. Now THAT was an accomplishment!
Rating:
Summary: HORRIBLE!!!
Review: This is the cheapest, worst movie ever made. The budget for the film must have been $9.50 ($5.00 of which was the payment to Buster Crabbe). The other $4.50 was for the videotape and payment to the remaining cast. I have this on videotape--and will replace it on DVD someday. As bad as the movie is, it is SO bad that it is hilarious to watch. Bad scripts, bad acting, bad special effects--it doesn't get any better (or worse?) than this.
Rating: 
Summary: For Film Students Only!
Review: Very bad, even for the price. I heard Fred Olen Ray spent $12,000 on this film and I'd like to see his bookkeeping records because this does not even look like a $12,000 film. There is a lot of day-for-night shooting, the edits are choppy and uneven, the FX are subpar by any standard..
I am a big fan of low budget videos and this is not without enjoyment,though more of a learning tool than a so bad its good classic..
<< 1 >>
| 
