Rating: 
Summary: Great Movie, I like it alot
Review: Oliver Stones best film,in my view * I like this film because it deals with the JFK murder & I love to watch Kevin Costner he's great too. I thought it was scary but fun too. Have a look at this masterpiece Film .,in my opinion its a classic film worth paying money for. So grab a copy ok,you'll enjoy it. Check it out!
Rating:
Summary: Not The Half Of It
Review: There's no question in my mnd there was a Govt. Conspiracy to kill our last truly inspiring President, but what is lost in the imbroglio over the contents of this most controversial film is..Much of the powerful evidence was not depicted. The Vietnam segment is by far the best part of the film and is worth the price of the video for that, as well as some truly amazing re-creations in the photographic and editing aspects.
Rating:
Summary: Review #2
Review: I had forgotten that I have already reviewed JFK. However, at the time I was a hard core conspiracy buff. I probably watched this movie at least 15 times (just ask my wonderfully patient wife) for the sheer joy of the conspiracy angle. Well, folks, I am now convinced that LHO acted alone. That's not relevant here, but if you want to e-mail me, I'll tell you why. I still believe the movie is of very high caliber with a great cast. I am a fan of Mr. Stone and JFK does not disappoint. I recommend it to anyone who is interested in period work, but please don't take it at face value. It is distorted and not very factual. Do your own research.
Rating: 
Summary: CINEMATIC MASTERPIECE
Review: I don't understand why people gave this movie such a hard time when it first came out. Some people saw it as an awful piece of Stonian propaganda; I saw it as a film about a man's theories on the JFK assassination and his quest for the truth--not necessarily, THE truth, but Truth in general. (To you historians--lighten up! However, I will agree with you about the "enhanced" Zabruder film --a complete and total abominable fabrication.) Whether you disagree with me or not is besides the point, however--politics aside, JFK is still a brilliantly made, compelling and breathtaking film about a particular point in American history (the mid-1960's) that's rarely been captured on film--of when people started questioning those very institutions that up until then had seemed rock solid. If you missed that, then I really feel sorry for you, 'cuz you missed a really great film.
Rating:
Summary: 4.5 Stars No Doubt
Review: A highly charged, in-your-face look at the aftermath of John F. Kennedy's assassination. Costner is nothing short of superb as Jim Garrison, the ruthless district attorney. All the other cast members are equally brilliant in this fact-based (if not a little too fact-based) powerhouse.
Rating: 
Summary: The Conspiracy
Review: I don't have an opinion on the events of November 22 1963, perhaps its because I don't live in America or had not yet been born. In spite of that I have always found this story intriguing. While it does make you think there are some scenes in the film which make you think that Garrison is incredibly naive. Nevertheless, the final half hour is gripping as his theory of events unfolds. The picture quality of the DVD is excellent and the sound is good. On the negative side this DVD not only lacks any features it is also a flipper. I don't mind too much as after the first 100 minutes the break was welcome. For those who hate flippers or want features - avoid this one.
Rating:
Summary: A study in sheer craftsmanship
Review: Oliver Stone's "JFK" is an extremely well directed, edited and photographed film. Its editing and cinematography won well-deserved Oscars. It is amazing how Stone manages to include so much information and actually creating momentum out of them. Despite the fact that it throws all sorts of rumours and theories about the Kennedy-assasination at us (and this over three hours long), the film is never confusing or boring. Another asset is John Williams' very good score. The only weaknesses of "JFK" are the rather uninspired treatment of Garrison's family life and Garrison's overly sentimental oration at the end of the movie. But such knitpicking pales in the face of ambition and achievement on offer. "JFK" was attacked for just creating new rumours instead of enlightening the case, but films must first of all be captivating, not historically accurate. They are pieces of art which show the vision of an artist. If you want hard facts, read history books, the appropriate medium for that. As a piece of innovative cinema, "JFK" is superior.
Rating:
Summary: A Very Important Film.
Review: Oliver Stone's "JFK" is undeniably an extremely important film. This is a movie that is not just a study of the mysteries surrounding the assassination of John F. Kennedy, this is a study of power and the workings of power. "JFK" goes into the dark corners of our government and it's shadowy dealings. Anyone fascinated by the mechanics of politics and power should see this film. Stone presents a thrilling piece of film that is incredibly convincing and disturbing. He doesn't subject to all of Jim Garrison's conspiracy theories. Instead, he uses Garrison as a vehicle to search for the truth. He uses Garrison as the base to display the harsh reality of how Kennedy was killed and why. In fact, Stone doesn't use this to display HIS own thoughts, but to express many theories. This is also a masterpiece in the technical area with the stunning effectiveness "JFK" has in the cross-editing, inserting documentary footage with film footage. The screenplay is brilliant and it's incredible how much information, characters and powerful drama it contains. The cinematography is rich and artistic. The acting is powerful like the story. "JFK" should be shown in schools all across America, this is an extremely important film every American should watch.
Rating:
Summary: One of Stone's few worthwhile efforts
Review: Forget whether this film is factually accurate--it's not. But that's not the point. As sheer cinema, it's a tour-de-force, one of the few times Stone's over-the-top antics make the film rather than derail it. Though Costner is only serviceable in the lead as Garrison, where this film flourishes are in the bits: Tommy Lee Jones as an effeminate conspirator, John Candy at his best as an FBI insider and man of great appitites, Kevin Bacon gritty and real as a convict contacted by Garrison. It's easily Stone's best film--his two Viet Nam films are powerful, but this one has the scope and sweep of an epic, and for once he lives up to his ambitions. As a true detester of Oliver Stone's later work, I can honestly reccomend this as not just palatable but powerful.
Rating:
Summary: NEVER WAS MEANT TO BE COMPLETELY FACTUAL!
Review: Mr. Stone accomplished exactly what he started out to do. Bring renewed public interest in the crime of the century. Anyone who watches this film and assumes that everything in it is exactly the way it was, has been led down the wrong path. How could anyone know EXACTLY what was said and done by the conspirators and key players before and after the assassination? Oliver Stone has done an excellent job in his INTERPRETATION of the events surrounding the murder. Those who criticize it are either wearing blinders or are afraid of something. Maybe the truth? Highly recommended to every American citizen.
| 
